Coroners critisism

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by rockape623, Nov 7, 2007.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Yet another inquest...and yet another verdict of the unlawful killing of a soldier in Afghanistan.

    But yet again a Coroner has seen fit to criticise the British Army and its logistics. This time apparently, a bomb disabling device (ECM) was in theatre but lying in someones stores when it should have been fitted to a vehicle out on Ops.

    Gordon Gentle of RHF was killed by an IED which according to the Coroner, would have been disabled by the jamming device. A `breakdown` in communications between Logistics was to blame.

    Scant consolation to Pte Gentle`s folks methinks.
  2. Without breaking OPSEC, it's obvious that to anyone who has been out recently the problem starts at the door of the CQMS. Not loggies and certainly p1ss all to do with the RLC. This one belongs to the REME, the Sigs Sgt and the Patrol Commander.
  3. I wholeheartedly agree with you mate, but shouldn`t there be some sort of system whereby certain pieces of kit are `flagged` so when they hit the stores, they can be requestioned by those who need them? Or am I in La-La land with this?
  4. It was actually Iraq. Another thread here.
  5. I dont understand how You come to that conclusion Cable Ties. The inquest reported communications failure, could it not just as much have been some Loggy clerk not informing the unit that the kit was ready to be picked up?
  6. Sorry Dryroasted, you are correct and I hang my head in shame.

    Must remember to check facts before ranting!!!
  7. How do the REME get tarnished with this?
  8. It's not the Logistics that deal with THAT type of kit, REME and Sigs are the boys(well they were when we were over the water). It may have been the people responsible for recalibration etc hadn't informed the REME Tech guys that it was ready but that isn't a Logistics role

    Oh and Loggies don't have clerks( certainly not in the last 25 years anyway) /pedantmode off
  9. Not tarnishing as such but at a Regimental level the REME are responsible for the collection of certain kits that need constant recalibration including sigs kit. It would depend whose remit ECM falls under but even in a Sigs unit they surely have a Workshop/LAD controlling their tech stuff or perhaps even a Force Workshop :?
  10. "REME" -part of the wider "logistic" chain perhaps?

    Without commenting on specific case - if a spare part gets to a unit but doesn't get fitted, it is hardly the RLC's fault but may still be a logistic failing.

    You can't blame "Loggy clerk" (whatever one of them is) for not telling chain of command. If it is vital, life-saving kit the CoC should be asking for it.
  11. Good to see the RLCs fine upstanding position of trying to shoulder slope the blame after a tragedy.

    If any of you chods (and I'm not hoping for much with the Restricted Learning Capabilty of the trogs) actually read the report rather than believing journo nonsense, you'd see that the kit wasn't even delivered to be installed until the 28th. To have it in vehicles that evening is a bloody good show from the REME. Hardly a good call to try and shift the blame that way.
  12. But apparently the kit was lying in a store some 1 km away from the base. Depending on how long the kit was there, the fault feasably lies with
    a) A clerk attached to the Logistics Unit at the store 1 km away who didn't send the paperwork to say the kit was ready for pickup
    b) The G1098 guy at the other end who got the paperwork and didn't act on it.

    Of course, if the kit had only arrived in stores that morning then it was no-ones fault and the coroner is talking bollox
  13. Oh shut the feck up on the cap badge slagging, please?

    Numerous parties were involved of numerous cap badges - combat, combat support and combat service support. Whilst the exact failure points in a specific direction, different actions by a number of other parties could have made a difference in theory. That is part of the randomness of such events.
  14. I'm not interested in it Dilfor, only in exploring the actuality. That is why I wrote the bit at the bottom.
  15. I'm not slagging off any cap badge. I'm a REME Tech myself so have a vested interest in making sure this sort of thing doesn't happen.

    There has clearly been a failure in SOP's. The patrol commander shouldn't have gone out without the kit. Full stop. Whether the kit is unavailable due to the REME or the Sigs Rep is another issue. There is enough spare in the system without needing the last one in theatre to be serviceable, equally, the Sigs Rep needed to track and ensure his availability was up to scratch.