Comrade Corbyn to the fore - whither (or wither) the Labour Party?

DaManBugs

On ROPS
On ROPs
Book Reviewer
Grow up you tedious oaf!
Translated to: Bugsy's defeated me with factual questions I can't answer and made me look a bit of a cünt, so I've decided to insult him instead. Does that sound about right, Murf's_Whore?:-D:-D:-D

MsG
 
Corby was fins as a largely anonymous back bencher of little importance. His 1970s Trotskyist tendencies could be safely ignored as long as he remained generally on the party message. Unfortunately as leader of the party, his lack of judgement is going to make the Labour party unacceptable to many of the more moderate majority.

I fully believe that Corby will have to be removed before the next GE if Labour are to get back in power and I suspect that Keir Starmer will be entering the leadership contest at some point.
 
Translated to: Bugsy's defeated me with factual questions I can't answer and made me look a bit of a cünt, so I've decided to insult him instead. Does that sound about right, Murf's_Whore?:-D:-D:-D

MsG
Bugsy, there is a completely separate thread for you to post your various lies in, while the rest of us take the piss out of you for being a smelly, decrepit failure who was arse raped by his father, you can get your attention fix there.
 

DaManBugs

On ROPS
On ROPs
Book Reviewer
Bugsy, there is a completely separate thread for you to post your various lies in, while the rest of us take the piss out of you for being a smelly, decrepit failure who was arse raped by his father, you can get your attention fix there.
Don't derail the thread, spackerman! There are enough of your selfish sort determined to do the same, just to satisfy their personal agendas and spoil an interesting thread for other ARRSErs! If you've nothing to add to the subject, just do one, spackerinski!

MsG
 
It's not the right time, Milne hasn't finished ghost writing Corbyns book "My Struggle" yet
The point being that I don't think Corbyn is capable of making a defining speech. He has spent a lifetime on the backbenches spouting student politics to empty seats in the HoC's. Those same backbenchers are now pleading with him to sort out the mess they have created and he is unable to do it.
 
[My bold in your post] A "fact" that's never been actually proved! What Jeremy Corbyn has done for most of his life is to support the Palestinian cause. That's a far cry from "supporting terrorist organisations". He's also repeatedly denounced Palestinian attacks on Israeli territory and in other countries, while still supporting their cause.

Moreover, there are millions of folks around the world who support the Palestinian cause, many of them famous and/or in leading social positions. Are you going to label all of them "terrorist sympathisers"? Just what are the criteria used to stamp someone as a "terrorist sympathiser"? And how come your man Corbyn has only "earned" that epithet since he became leader? More precisely, why has he suddenly become a "terrorist sympathiser" since he became the leader of the Labour Party? Why wasn't he labeled as such in all the many years before that?

What you (and others on ARRSE) are doing is attempting to defend the indefensible. The privileged classes desperately want to prevent at all costs Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister, because they, probably rightly, fear that he'll put an end to their decades-long, cushy and highly lucrative numbers sucking obscene profits out of the public purse, and he might even hold them to account for it.

I bet not a single one of you would deny that you (collectively) would like to see a "better" UK. A UK that offers more perspective, more opportunity to a wider sector of the population, better social services, etc, yet you (collectively) continue to believe the (privileged-class financed) statements that: "Corbyn would be a disaster for the UK". Just where is the solid evidence for that? I'd appreciate it if we could avoid the usual: "Well, he'd ruin the economy", "Corbyn would deter foreign investments", Corbyn's political policies would bankrupt the UK" and such facile bollix.

I'd like to see some sort of solid and detailed economic proof that any of that will come to pass, given the inevitable doomsday predictions that have followed every Labour Party victory in the UK to date. And for those who, Pavlov-dog-like, proclaim that: "Labour's ruined the country every time they've been in office", I recommend that you study the official history of what happened when this or that party was in office in the UK. It's very enlightening.

MsG
"Corbyn would be a disaster for the UK"?
The solid evidence is the performance of the last two Labour governments.
The current bunch are far from perfect. But if anyone believes that Corbyn & his entourage of clowns would be any better, they are seriously deluded.
God forbid they ever get their hands anywhere near the levers of power.
 
Just following your lead, Testicle_Cranium. Just following your lead!:mrgreen::mrgreen::mrgreen:

Here are the actual facts about Corbyn's excursion:

- At the invitation of the Tunisian Prime Minister in 2014, Jeremy Corbyn attended a remembrance ceremony for the victims of an Israeli terrorist atrocity (the 1985 bombing of the Palestinian government in exile in Tunis that was even condemned by Margaret Thatcher at the time).

- The event was not a "funeral" in any way shape or form because nobody was buried there on the day Corbyn visited.

- None of the eight terrorists who carried out the Munich attack are even buried in Tunisia, let alone in the graveyard Jeremy Corbyn visited (five are buried in Libya, two in unknown graves after being assassinated by the Israelis, and one was last seen in hiding in 1999).

- There is no evidence that the Black September members who were buried in the graveyard in 1992 were "terrorists" or Munich "plotters" as alleged in the shockingly dishonest Daily Mail front page that kicked off this latest anti-Corbyn smear campaign.

Yet the whole visit was sensationally billed as some sort of plot by Jeremy Corbyn to "honour terrorists", while UK politicians cravenly arse-lick the Saudis, who actually financed the 9/11 attacks (and many others besides). That's proper "impartial", that is. Why should your man Corbyn even address the hysterical nutters demanding an explanation, when he's done nothing wrong?

MsG
If you bothered to follow the whole conversation as opposed to dippping in and out like a petulant child you would know your questions have been answered a few pages back. I suggest go back a few pages read, digest consider the issue then reconsider, plenty of evidence the the men buried in Tunis are, were individuals involved in the Munich massacre, then consider one of the men at the ceremony insitigated a atrocity only a month later in Israel.
 
Don't derail the thread, spackerman! There are enough of your selfish sort determined to do the same, just to satisfy their personal agendas and spoil an interesting thread for other ARRSErs! If you've nothing to add to the subject, just do one, spackerinski!

MsG
Thats right Bugsy, its always someone else, never you.
You stupid, smelly old prat.
 

DaManBugs

On ROPS
On ROPs
Book Reviewer
If you bothered to follow the whole conversation as opposed to dippping in and out like a petulant child you would know your questions have been answered a few pages back. I suggest go back a few pages read, digest consider the issue then reconsider, plenty of evidence the the men buried in Tunis are, were individuals involved in the Munich massacre, then consider one of the men at the ceremony insitigated a atrocity only a month later in Israel.
You might want to take your own advice there, fella! Plenty of evidence? Really? NONE of the individuals involved in the Munich massacre are even buried in Tunisia, let alone in the cemetery that Corbyn visited! And that's a verifiable fact!

Sure, one of the other attendees allegedly instigated an atrocity a month after the event. So just how was Corbyn involved with that? And what did he have to do with it?

I understand that you're just obeying your slavish instinct to bedevil anyone even remotely connected to allegedly "Socialist" policies, but examine the subject carefully and ask yourself earnestly whether you're not cutting off your nose to spite your face. In other words: whether you're enthusiastically supporting policies that are, in the end, against your own personal interests.

MsG
 
Don't derail the thread, spackerman! There are enough of your selfish sort determined to do the same, just to satisfy their personal agendas and spoil an interesting thread for other ARRSErs! If you've nothing to add to the subject, just do one, spackerinski!

MsG
the-irony-22468156.png
 
"Corbyn would be a disaster for the UK". Just where is the solid evidence for that? I'd appreciate it if we could avoid the usual: "Well, he'd ruin the economy", "Corbyn would deter foreign investments", Corbyn's political policies would bankrupt the UK" and such facile bollix.
He doesn't talk about Venezuela much now to be fair.
 
For Corbyn, and those defending him, you should remember the old adage: a man is known by the company he keeps. That tells you all you need to know about Corbyn. The man is a terrorist sympathiser, who hates the west. Simples.
 

DaManBugs

On ROPS
On ROPs
Book Reviewer
For Corbyn, and those defending him, you should remember the old adage: a man is known by the company he keeps. That tells you all you need to know about Corbyn. The man is a terrorist sympathiser, who hates the west. Simples.
Corbyn hates the West? And you "know" that how? I thought stupid nonsense like that stopped along with the Cold War in about 1991. Would you like to post some proper "evidence" that Corbyn "hates the West"?

MsG
 
Mr Corbyn, you are an unmitigated liar-a trait which appears to be endemic amongst many of your supporters.
I've never seen someone who is accidentally photographed standing/siting/noshing off so many terrorists, and be unaware of their background.
Poor bloke must just be a political equivalent of Mr Bean in his trips around the world to get photographed accidentally standing next to so many questionable people.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top