Common Purpose - What do we know?

I think the Legion of Frontiersmen had similar grandiose puff on their websites.

[Loving the blanket 'disagree' to all my posts, BTW. Couldn't you just set up a macro to save yourself the mouseclicks you fcuking gammon?]
A bot could well post in a more spontaneous manner. He's a 'kipper who emigrated but hates immigration....
 
A typical response of a person whose glib patronising dismissal of a reputable organisation & when challenged resorts to personal insults. Very similar to the tactics so beloved of CP so called "graduates".
You do realise that voting every post "dumb" regardless of content is an insult? One made by the intellectually lazy and hard of thinking.
 

Subversion:

‘Beyond Authority’

A book by Common Purpose’s Chief Executive, Mrs. Julia Middleton

“Leadership in a Changing World” Published by Palgrave Macmillan


In its 163 pages, under a dark cover featuring a maze, Mrs. Middleton outlines her brand of leadership training, which is sold by her “charity” for millions, most of it our taxes, to over 30,000 people largely in the public sector.

Her leadership is “one that can cope in unfamiliar territory”, “where leaders are taken beyond the closed doors of their own organizations.” Into, of course, Common Purpose meetings - behind closed doors. In CP terms, “beyond authority” means to abuse the authority of your paid employment for control and private gain. “Beyond authority” is Mrs. Middleton’s phrase for dissolving democracy, and she’s doing it on a vast scale.


‘Charity’ for the powerful

We quickly learn that Middleton’s charity is very different from others. Middleton seems obsessed with power, wealth and money, be it with Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Natwest, Lehman Brothers, The Young Foundation, Unilever, KPMG, The Financial Times, Imperial Tobacco, the chairman of the Law Society, Chief Constables, or a host of named elitist individuals. As Sir Derek Higgs, Chairman, Alliance and Leicester plc says on the rear cover – “Julia Middleton has a contacts list to die for”.

In his Foreword, Sir David Bell, Chair of the Financial Times, attempts to explain Middleton and her works in terms of leaf people, forest people, alchemy, and magic. He praises Charles Darwin.

The undertone is certainly humanist, and with an encroaching darkness, it directs people to undertake continual change, thus destroying the old, without specifying anything to change to. Confusion and inactivity results. CP has used this well established Frankfurt School subversion technique on the NHS, which it has paralyzed, and on the Conservative Party.

In the book itself, the word ‘conspiracy’ is used repeatedly to describe the process of Common Purpose networking, and the reader is even asked if the ‘dark arts’ apply. There is no Christian charity in this book, and with its wealthy clients, CP’s charity status should be revoked immediately.


Personal background

Educated overseas in the USA and France, Middleton is an international educational product; she refers to time spent in Manhattan, she doesn’t mention she shared an elitist French school with the head of the United Nations, nor her time at the London School of Economics, the Industrial Society, or the Marxist, think-tank DEMOS.

She admits to domestic disorder, her children seem to have been largely left alone, and she does not mention her husband Rupert Middleton, a Robert Maxwell man, once Group Director of Manufacturing for Trinity Mirror newspaper group.



Concealing the purpose

Little of Middleton’s text is her own. Her book is comprised of a myriad of linked quotes from the wealthy, powerful, political elite on the subject of ‘leadership’. She is very impressed by Blair, Clinton, and German bankers.

Whilst German bankers are great, the British are warlike, cold, and they are the worst at (human) feedback. She adds that the English are people who ‘like to take canned food with them’ to Europe. White males appear suspect.



Hatred of Britain

Karl Marx, and the Chinese general and authority on the philosophy of warfare, Sun-Tzu, are quoted. She has been given sound advice by a former Chef de Cabinet of the European Commission. The book leaves you with the impression that Mrs. Middleton is a communist with a hatred of all things British. That wouldn’t matter if Common Purpose’s inner sanctum didn’t control £214 billion, or one quarter, of Britain’s budget through the NHS and her 8,000 quangos.



Fifth Column

Excited by the use of a ‘fifth column’ to drive forward change through the House of Lords, Mrs Middleton is keen to blur and break down boundaries between individuals, organisations, the public and private sectors, who then will need to ‘break out of their organisational silos,’ to form partnerships and act. The language is reminiscent of a form of Gramscian soft fascism, where western democracies can be overturned by undermining traditional beliefs and values, and the slow secretive merging of the public and private sectors into a state-controlled partnership.



Incitement to criminality

In reality, operating outside authority for the police, and many others, means operating illegally and without accountability. This does not bother Middleton however, who urges Common Purpose leaders to create their own legitimacy. She quotes organizations as Stranger 1 and Stranger 2. But why are these strangers so shy? Are they financial contributors, do they have political agendas?

If readers sense something sinister at work, I agree. Middleton does not really explain how she was initially able to raise £500,000 in a few months, and continue to receive huge donations from big business. She does not tell the reader how her Advisory Boards in each City select members for the Common Purpose elite. We know about half are selected for the inner sanctum - those who can be compromised, those who can be bribed with big salaries in quango or non-jobs, and those who will lie to conceal CP activities.
But she does give a hint as to how the chosen are classified – ‘Suns’ (people of established power and influence), as ‘Stars’ (those of rapid but unpredictable rise to power and influence), and as ‘Moons’ (those individuals of diminishing power). Those who will not help Common Purpose, or who challenge it, are called ‘Black Holes’.

Fraudulent agenda

The ‘black holes’ who oppose are to be dealt with. Techniques include shaming, embarrassing, harassing, wearing them down, ignoring and bulldozing. The picture of her selection techniques is not good, but it is actually much worse in practice– neither is the reference to “borrowing great East German phrases” such as from Hans Reckers Board Member of Deutsche Bundesbank. Phrases such as ‘useful idiots’ and ‘expert idiots’. You can’t help comparing her views to those of German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Mrs. Middleton has risen to select people for senior posts in Britain’s public sector. She says she’s independent - but is clearly working for the hand over of power to the EU, which is organized from the old Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

Has this book inspired me? Most certainly – to warn all those I can to watch out for the ‘fifth column’ that is Middleton’s elitist Common Purpose. A criminal organization with a subversive, corrupt and deeply fraudulent agenda. If not stopped, you won’t be able to work in government without first joining Common Purpose, the EU’s Communist Party, and it is now close to controlling Britain’s local government and our justice system.



Beyond Authority - Leadership in a Changing World | J. Middleton | Palgrave Macmillan



I might give this a read and see I agree with any of that., cheap ones going for a few quid on amazon
 
Last edited:

Subversion:

‘Beyond Authority’

A book by Common Purpose’s Chief Executive, Mrs. Julia Middleton

“Leadership in a Changing World” Published by Palgrave Macmillan


In its 163 pages, under a dark cover featuring a maze, Mrs. Middleton outlines her brand of leadership training, which is sold by her “charity” for millions, most of it our taxes, to over 30,000 people largely in the public sector.

Her leadership is “one that can cope in unfamiliar territory”, “where leaders are taken beyond the closed doors of their own organizations.” Into, of course, Common Purpose meetings - behind closed doors. In CP terms, “beyond authority” means to abuse the authority of your paid employment for control and private gain. “Beyond authority” is Mrs. Middleton’s phrase for dissolving democracy, and she’s doing it on a vast scale.


‘Charity’ for the powerful

We quickly learn that Middleton’s charity is very different from others. Middleton seems obsessed with power, wealth and money, be it with Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Natwest, Lehman Brothers, The Young Foundation, Unilever, KPMG, The Financial Times, Imperial Tobacco, the chairman of the Law Society, Chief Constables, or a host of named elitist individuals. As Sir Derek Higgs, Chairman, Alliance and Leicester plc says on the rear cover – “Julia Middleton has a contacts list to die for”.

In his Foreword, Sir David Bell, Chair of the Financial Times, attempts to explain Middleton and her works in terms of leaf people, forest people, alchemy, and magic. He praises Charles Darwin.

The undertone is certainly humanist, and with an encroaching darkness, it directs people to undertake continual change, thus destroying the old, without specifying anything to change to. Confusion and inactivity results. CP has used this well established Frankfurt School subversion technique on the NHS, which it has paralyzed, and on the Conservative Party.

In the book itself, the word ‘conspiracy’ is used repeatedly to describe the process of Common Purpose networking, and the reader is even asked if the ‘dark arts’ apply. There is no Christian charity in this book, and with its wealthy clients, CP’s charity status should be revoked immediately.


Personal background

Educated overseas in the USA and France, Middleton is an international educational product; she refers to time spent in Manhattan, she doesn’t mention she shared an elitist French school with the head of the United Nations, nor her time at the London School of Economics, the Industrial Society, or the Marxist, think-tank DEMOS.

She admits to domestic disorder, her children seem to have been largely left alone, and she does not mention her husband Rupert Middleton, a Robert Maxwell man, once Group Director of Manufacturing for Trinity Mirror newspaper group.



Concealing the purpose

Little of Middleton’s text is her own. Her book is comprised of a myriad of linked quotes from the wealthy, powerful, political elite on the subject of ‘leadership’. She is very impressed by Blair, Clinton, and German bankers.

Whilst German bankers are great, the British are warlike, cold, and they are the worst at (human) feedback. She adds that the English are people who ‘like to take canned food with them’ to Europe. White males appear suspect.



Hatred of Britain

Karl Marx, and the Chinese general and authority on the philosophy of warfare, Sun-Tzu, are quoted. She has been given sound advice by a former Chef de Cabinet of the European Commission. The book leaves you with the impression that Mrs. Middleton is a communist with a hatred of all things British. That wouldn’t matter if Common Purpose’s inner sanctum didn’t control £214 billion, or one quarter, of Britain’s budget through the NHS and her 8,000 quangos.



Fifth Column

Excited by the use of a ‘fifth column’ to drive forward change through the House of Lords, Mrs Middleton is keen to blur and break down boundaries between individuals, organisations, the public and private sectors, who then will need to ‘break out of their organisational silos,’ to form partnerships and act. The language is reminiscent of a form of Gramscian soft fascism, where western democracies can be overturned by undermining traditional beliefs and values, and the slow secretive merging of the public and private sectors into a state-controlled partnership.



Incitement to criminality

In reality, operating outside authority for the police, and many others, means operating illegally and without accountability. This does not bother Middleton however, who urges Common Purpose leaders to create their own legitimacy. She quotes organizations as Stranger 1 and Stranger 2. But why are these strangers so shy? Are they financial contributors, do they have political agendas?

If readers sense something sinister at work, I agree. Middleton does not really explain how she was initially able to raise £500,000 in a few months, and continue to receive huge donations from big business. She does not tell the reader how her Advisory Boards in each City select members for the Common Purpose elite. We know about half are selected for the inner sanctum - those who can be compromised, those who can be bribed with big salaries in quango or non-jobs, and those who will lie to conceal CP activities.
But she does give a hint as to how the chosen are classified – ‘Suns’ (people of established power and influence), as ‘Stars’ (those of rapid but unpredictable rise to power and influence), and as ‘Moons’ (those individuals of diminishing power). Those who will not help Common Purpose, or who challenge it, are called ‘Black Holes’.

Fraudulent agenda

The ‘black holes’ who oppose are to be dealt with. Techniques include shaming, embarrassing, harassing, wearing them down, ignoring and bulldozing. The picture of her selection techniques is not good, but it is actually much worse in practice– neither is the reference to “borrowing great East German phrases” such as from Hans Reckers Board Member of Deutsche Bundesbank. Phrases such as ‘useful idiots’ and ‘expert idiots’. You can’t help comparing her views to those of German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Mrs. Middleton has risen to select people for senior posts in Britain’s public sector. She says she’s independent - but is clearly working for the hand over of power to the EU, which is organized from the old Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

Has this book inspired me? Most certainly – to warn all those I can to watch out for the ‘fifth column’ that is Middleton’s elitist Common Purpose. A criminal organization with a subversive, corrupt and deeply fraudulent agenda. If not stopped, you won’t be able to work in government without first joining Common Purpose, the EU’s Communist Party, and it is now close to controlling Britain’s local government and our justice system.



Beyond Authority - Leadership in a Changing World | J. Middleton | Palgrave Macmillan



I might give this a read and see I agree with any of that., cheap ones going for a few quid on amazon
From here?

Expose the EU dictatorship and its police state

Who funds the site?

It's almost as if arrse was infested with 'kippers with a political agenda isn't it?

David Noakes - Wikipedia
 
It's almost as if arrse was infested with 'kippers with a political agenda isn't it?
I would say that arrse has a lot of members who have traditional values of family, nation and democracy, if that makes me a 'kipper in your eyes then I think that says more about you than it does me.
 
Last edited:
From here?

Expose the EU dictatorship and its police state

Who funds the site?

It's almost as if arrse was infested with 'kippers with a political agenda isn't it?

David Noakes - Wikipedia
I suppose you could say that site is information just like the book.

Just like this: https://www.arrse.co.uk/wiki/Common_Purpose_(Charitable_Trust)

Which is why I will read the book too.

I will decide thereafter if it is a subversive agenda to be considered
On a side note, I know one person who has done the Navigator course. It started by putting junior people from a range of organisations together for a chit chat and confidential "tell-all" about their organisations, Visiting various institutions like prisons etc for team building like exercises of sorts.
I can see why they do this, It creates faux trust amongst people who you would see as your social equal.
It also gives CP a bit of intel on the organisations, maybe they are using bribery and skullduggery on graduates who are in positions of power in these organisations.
"Push a bit more PC for the greater good, sack this person, vilify this one, send this one to prison, let this one walk free, pint this, don't print that" etc etc.
This is subversive, so that that one out the way.

You don't get invited to this course, you get put forward by others who have been invited to later courses. That is telling.
The fact that Julie Middleton fought to have CP kept out of the news like a gag order and graduates are not publicised is what makes me suspicious, amongst an absolute goldmine of other freely available information.
What we see and what we are told are almost poles apart.

Now ask yourself, How fucked up and confused about their roles do employees have to be before they start calling out the leadership. The Police force comes to mind.
Look at how messed up most of our institutions are now, there has to be a correlation, the problems are top down.


Telford, Rotherham, Iraq,....the list goes on and on. These results of these problems are of the actions/inactions of those at the top affecting those below them. There are other nations and organisations worldwide who's leadership has been caught up in CP's net and who are delivering similar agendas, this cannot be a coincidence.

If CP ever instilled any esprit de corps, I suggest it will be put to the test in the coming years. I suggest most are cowards and will run and hide or start singing.

They might have a snitch in their ranks as a result of the current climate of f.u.b.a.r, wouldn't that be a jolly to behold, A service to society and a disservice to the "establishment", poles apart if you will.
 
From the article - "Common Purpose undermines traditionally effective and efficient government departments with an overwhelming influx of new language, political correctness and management initiatives. The talk is of empowering communities, vision, worklessness, mainstreaming (sucking EU money into a project to sustain it), community empowerment, working partnership, regeneration and celebrating diversity etc etc. Documents appear about change, and reorganisation. "
It's comforting to learn that there is a greater purpose behind all the bollox we are being fed. I thought that the lunatics had taken over the asylum, wrong again.
The bit about "traditionally effective and efficient government departments" undermines the veracity of the piece, though.
 
Perhaps it depends on how far back you look. There was a time when government departments did not think of themselves as businesses.

[I could go on and on, but I think I'll leave it at that.]
I was thinking more about the inherent contradictions between efficient and effective.

It's a rare organisation which has both and generally one dealing with a far less complicated situation than government.
 
I was thinking more about the inherent contradictions between efficient and effective.
I think there's only a contradiction if you define efficient as 'working in a well-organized way', if you expand it to 'achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort or expense' then it becomes effective.
 
I think there's only a contradiction if you define efficient as 'working in a well-organized way', if you expand it to 'achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort or expense' then it becomes effective.
The contradiction automatically arises where the reason for the organisation's existence isn't 'to operate with maximum efficiency'.

Put it this way: it's not very efficient to have expensive vehicles and skilled crews sitting around on the off chance they'll be needed, but it makes for a highly effective ambulance service.
 

seaweed

LE
Book Reviewer
The contradiction automatically arises where the reason for the organisation's existence isn't 'to operate with maximum efficiency'.

Put it this way: it's not very efficient to have expensive vehicles and skilled crews sitting around on the off chance they'll be needed, but it makes for a highly effective ambulance service.
The efficiency is in using Operations Research to optimise the number and placing of ambulances so that you have the right number of vehicles and crews at readiness to meet the perceived need.
 
The right will always face sanctions the left rarely do.
CORRECT !!

Before Brexit , the EU was Left wing in their thinking / acting.

Nowadays , you see fledgling Countries trying their wings - to retain their individualty - noticed the crushing response from the EU ?

I've said it before - Fascists are the LEFT wingers - Stalin / Hoenecker / Mussolini / Hitler - he of the National SOCIALIST Party....- the Left are throwing the Fascist label over the Right wing - EU is following the Nazi's...
 
I would say that arrse has a lot of members who have traditional values of family, nation and democracy, if that makes me a 'kipper in your eyes then I think that says more about you than me.
Being a member of UKIP makes you a 'kipper. HTH.
 
What political agenda would that be?
Have you forgotten that we "Kippers" won?

We voted leave, Brexit is happening. It's done allbar the shouting.
Kippers aren't trying to subvert anything
Kippers won what? I'm not interested in Brexit, there are multiple threads on it.

Kippers are using this site for political purposes, they've already subverted it.
 

Similar threads

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top