1. So, you cannot show where I stated the Police gave permission for the vigil. You lied, and are trying to bluster your way through.You can be as deliberately obtuse as you want.
Do you deny making the statement 'The Vigil was legal' from your post , do you not understand that a High Court Judge refused permission for a 'vigil' to take place and, the police were there to enforce that decision, what's it like in Cloud Cuckoo Land ?
Your fuckwitery is astounding,to deny a statement that you made in black and white, is amazing !
2. Kindly show *exactly* where the High Court refused permission for the vigil to go ahead. You may find this piece - which I have linked before to be helpful. (I'll give you a clue: the High Court did not refuse permission for the vigil to go ahead. )
The court declined a declaration that the Met's refusal was in breach of the Human Rights Act, stating the decision over whether or not to allow the protest to go ahead rested with the police.
The Court said the decision rested with the Met. The Court did not refuse permission for the vigil to go ahead, they threw the decision back at the Met. They did not rule.
3. You have already said the vigil was legal.
She attended early afternoon...the vigil was only 'legal' until 'people' started to ignore social distancing.
Can I suggest you stick to watching grass grow, and stop smoking it?