Contact RBL.
Generally CAB are excellent but not good at specific cases, more general advice.
Absolutely this.
As I said in my earlier post, because each branch of CAB is independent, they have their own budgetary constraints and their own priorities for advice provision. My local branch has, as stated, 24 staff but only 11 full-time employees (the ones who attend the quarterly free lunch I referred to being the substantive staff, not volunteers). Only the substantive staff get in depth specialist training and, certainly on the debt advice side, the approach is very adversarial, with a distinct whiff of barrack room lawyering about most of them. They would boast at these quarterly meetings about how they'd given some creditor or other the run around to show how clever they were.
My former organisation has a repayment ethos where, if a debt can be repaid within about six years, that would be recommended because, after all, it's what the debtor contracted to do and over that six year period we gave the client support in learning how to budget so they wouldn't be reliant on credit in future. CAB don't do that. They seemed unable to see that while they were tapdancing around creditors showing off how clever they were, the poor bloody clients were still being stressed out by the bombardment of phone calls, letters, emails and knocks at the door. CAB just didn't seem to want to have the difficult conversation with clients and would recommend ridiculous courses of action, such as offering £1 pcm token payments on mortgage arrears but not telling the client to cancel their £80 pcm Sky package. On one visit to their offices I sat in on an advice session and listened in to a phone call with debt clients. Both 'experienced' advisers used my least favourite phrase - 'no judge in the land is going to order you to pay more than £1 pcm'. I raised the point that this was potentially very dangerous advice and wrong on pretty much every level but I doubt anything has changed. Anyone who has spent even a couple of days in Court will know that you can't ever guarantee what a judge or even a Magistrate will decide.
When I retired, like
@Ecosse I, too volunteered my services. 30 years as a Legal Executive followed by a decade in debt advice with experience spanning the public, private and charity sectors and massive experience as an advocate in both Courts and Tribunals. Added to which, my involvement in the local Money Advice Group meant I was a known quantity. They wanted me to attend a three day training session for debt advice. I pointed out that I've got a Level 4 NVQ in Advice & Guidance (which actually took about half a day to achieve) and was a specialist tutor for my former employer so someone else would probably benefit more from the 3 days than I would. Nope, I had to attend for box ticking purposes. I decided that my volunteering hours would be better spent elsewhere.
To try to balance all that, I know that CAB are reliant on volunteers to such an extent because they are constantly having to penny pinch and have fewer and fewer substantive staff. Their client management systems are (or were, they might have improved) archaic and I well recall inviting their local IT guy to come to my office for a demonstration of our online debt advice tool which was the first in the country, and it might as well have been witchcraft for how amazed he was by it's capability. Added to that, every year they are fighting for funding from central and local government so are desperate to show they are uniquely placed to provide advice.
Face to face advice definitely has its place but if people can't access it when they need it, nor rely on its accuracy if they can obtain it, CAB's offering will cease to be sought. I know Citizen's Advice, the umbrella charity, are trying to diversify their methodology to include telephone and online advice but the infrastructure and back office support just isn't there at the moment.