CIA renditions strain Europe goodwill

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by DrStealth, Mar 20, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:


    does the end justify the means? has the 'western' secret services become the new gestapo?

    ffs what are they realy doing and what have they become.
  2. If you think multiple countries aren't doing this sort of kidnapping thing frequently, you're pretty much deluding yourself. Only issue is that in this case, the CIA got caught, since the Italians were already tailing the guy.

    Isn't there a thread on this already from a few months back?

  3. The French done it with Carlos the Jackel years ago. Acting on a CIA tip French Intelligence Officers lifted him from Sudan & in the process violated several International laws. Of course he deserved it but it just shows what other Governments have been up to in the past before these rendition flights.
  4. This sort of thing has always happened. The Israelis lifted Eichmann and that "nukular" geezer Mordecai in contravention of international treaties. And if memory serves, the UK tried it with Ronnie Biggs. Nobody really knows for sure how often other countries do (or have done) it because it's all hush hush.

    The Septics just do it on an industrial scale.

  5. Yep - and I don't care who that response offends. You can't fight in the gutter unless you're willing to get a little grubby yourselves...
  6. Bang on target. The blokes running around blowing things up do not respect borders, so to catch them, turn over every stone, no matter where that stone lies.

  7. Though not sympathetic with the issue, D_D hit it spot on. Couldn't have been said better.
  8. Hmmm.... while I've no problem with lowering the standard of evidence for a small number of very serious crimes I can't see why it can't be done legally and through the courts. Especially in an allied country such as Italy. We need counterbalances to defend against abuses...

  9. However, if you perform such grubby activities so incompetently that they end up on the front pages of the papers you will then aid the enemy to recruit more to his cause than you put away. This is not a strategy for success. If we are to do some dodgy things then they need to be kept very quiet. If they can't be kept quiet then don't do them as the blowback will ultimately hinder our cause.
  10. I agree..I am in favour of detaining terrorists I just believe that due process is essential. Matters like this with or without the complicity of other governments does not make the Arab world trust the US...or want to help in this battle. I do believe the moral high ground is essential and losing it even for a short term gain will do lasting damage to the 'hearts and minds' campaign.
  11. my entire point, ty
  12. Also - is it ever possible to hide this sort of a grubby activity?

    Sure, we might get away with funding the enemy of our enemy or something sneaky like that. But everyone, everywhere in the world, has a circle of friends/family who will notice when someone disappears!!!

  13. One argument against extra-judical activities such as rendition, detention without charge (etc) is that these measures are invariably introduced on the premise that they will only be used in "exceptional" circumstances.

    As soon as they are introduced, then they are used against any man and his dog in order to shortcut the due process of law. We now see businessmen extradited to the US without a prima facie case being presented, and a blind man extradited and locked up for allegedly injuring his child - despite the fact that he wasn't even in the US when the injury occurred.

    In the UK, anti-terror legislation is used to interrogate and criminalise political dissidents and protesters.

    Such methods are never appropriate and should never be provided to our
  14. All this concern over grubbiness prompts me to ask why bother to detain and interrogate and THEN try in a court?

    Why not just snatch, beat the faeces out of suspect, extract info and then kill 'em.

    You then have the information and if you did the last part right, no one is sure what happened and thus you spread fear and disorder amongst the terr's

    I sincerely hope the CIA/FSB/SVR/MI ? is doing exactly what is claimed but I would rather they showed a little more discretion about the job.
  15. It's worse that that MrPVRd,

    The businessmen concerned are UK citizens who are alleged to have committed a fraud in the UK against a UK bank and end up being tried in the US. I think we've lost the plot.