CGS says time to go home!

Sir Richard Dannatt is...

  • right only from military point of view

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • only partially right

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • he is rather wrong

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • he made a serious mistake

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • he is absolutely wrong

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • he had to resign first before making such a statement

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
Just turned on the news to hear that the CGS has said that our presence in Iraq is exacerbating our security problem and we should withdraw "Sometime soon".He's got a hell of a pair of moral balls on him, I'll give him that!

I imagine B'liar is in a bit of a cold sweat/hot rage now. :D
Sir Richard has made the call and said it how it is. Good on him. Stand by for incoming. Getting out of Iraq is essential if Afg is going to work in the long run. God knows what will happen to Iraq, not sure it will be any worse though. He made the point that we were never invited in we kicked the door in. I hope Blair is listening.
Yes. Just seen on the news. I wonder what Downing Street will say? Respect to the man, he's saying what everyone thinks. Do you think he'll keep his job?

Army chief declares war on Blair: 'We must quit Iraq soon'

The head of the Army is calling for British troops to withdraw from Iraq "soon" or risk catastophic consequences for both Iraq and British society.

In a devastating broadside at Tony Blair's foreign policy, General Sir Richard Dannatt stated explicitly that the continuing presence of British troops "exacerbates the security problems" in Iraq.

In an exclusive interview with the Daily Mail, Sir Richard also warns that a "moral and spiritual vacuum" has opened up in British society, which is allowing Muslim extremists to undermine "our accepted way of life."

The Chief of the General Staff believes that Christian values are under threat in Britain and that continuing to fight in Iraq will only make the situation worse.

His views will send shockwaves through Government.

They are a total repudiation of the Prime Minister, who has repeatedly insisted that British presence in Iraq is morally right and has had no effect on our domestic security.

Sir Richard, who took up his post earlier this year, warned that "our presence in Iraq exacerbates" the "difficulties we are facing around the world."

He lambasts Tony Blair's desire to forge a "liberal democracy" in Iraq as a "naive" failure and he warns that "whatever consent we may have had in the first place" from the Iraqi people "has largely turned to intolerance."

In one of the most outspoken interviews ever given by a serving soldier, Sir Richard also reveals:

* He was "outraged" by reports of injured soldiers recouperating in hospital alongside civilians being confronted by anti-war campaigners who told them to remove their uniforms.

* He gave Defence Secretary Des Browne a dressing down about the "unaccepatble" treatment of injured soldiers, warning him that the government was in danger of breaking the "covenant" between a nation and its Army and should not "let the Army down."

* He understands why Prince William and Prince Harry want to serve on the frontline but has not yet decided whether they will be allowed to fight in Afghanistan.

But it is Sir Richard's views of the situation in Iraq that will enrage Downing Street.

He says clearly we shoud "get ourselves out sometime soon because our presence exacerbates the security problems."

"We are in a Muslim country and Muslims' views of foreigners in their country are quite clear."

As a foreigner, you can be welcomed by being invited in a country, but we weren�t invited certainly by those in Iraq at the time.

"The military campaign we fought in 2003 effectively kicked the door in. Whatever consent we may have had in the first place, may have turned to tolerance and has largely turned to intolerance."

"That is a fact. I don�t say that the difficulties we are experiencing round the world are caused by our presence in Iraq but undoubtedly our presence in Iraq exacerbates them."

In comments that set him at loggerheads with Mr Blair, Gen Dannatt warns that the good intentions of 2003 have long since evaporated - pitching British troops into a lethal battle that few at home can understand.

"I think history will show that the planning for what happened after the initial successful war fighting phase was poor, probably based more on optimism than sound planning," he said.

"The original intention was that we put in place a liberal democracy that was an exemplar for the region, was pro West and might have a beneficial effect on the balance within the Middle East."

"That was the hope, whether that was a sensible or na�ve hope history will judge. I don�t think we are going to do that. I think we should aim for a lower ambition."

The Prime Minister has repeatedly insisted that British troops must stay until the Iraqi security forces are able to take charge - a forlorn hope as the country has slipped to the brink of civil war.

Sir Richard warned that the consequences will be felt at home, where failure to support Christian values is allowing a predatory Islamist vision to take hold.

He said: "When I see the Islamist threat in this country I hope it doesn�t make undue progress because there is a moral and spiritual vacuum in this country."

"Our society has always been embedded in Christian values; once you have pulled the anchor up there is a danger that our society moves with the prevailing wind."

"There is an element of the moral compass spinning. I think it is up to society to realise that is the situation we are in."

"We can�t wish the Islamist challenge to our society away and I believe that the army both in Iraq and Afghanistan and probably wherever we go next, is fighting the foreign dimension of the challenge to our accepted way of life."

"We need to face up to the Islamist threat, to those who act in the name of Islam and in a perverted way try to impose Islam by force on societies that do not wish it."

"It is said that we live in a post Christian society. I think that is a great shame. The broader Judaic-Christian tradition has underpinned British society. It underpins the British army."

General Dannatt says he has "more optimism" that "we can get it right in Afghanistan."

But he condemned the treatment of injured British soldiers, who have been forced to share wards with civilians in Selly Oak hospital in Birmingham.

Sir Richard said he confronted Mr Browne about the "covenant" between a nation and its armed forces.

"I said to the Secretary of State the army wont let the nation down but I don�t want the nation to let the army down."

"It is not acceptable for our casualties to be in mixed wards with civilians. I was outraged at the story of someone saying �take your uniform off�. Our people need the privacy of recovering in a military environment - a soldier manning a machine gun in Basra loses consciousness when he is hit by a missile and next recovers consciousness in a hospital in the UK."

"He wants to wake up to familiar sights and sounds, he wants to see people in uniform. He doesn�t want to be in a civilian environment."

He added: "I am going to stand up for what is right for the army. Honesty is what it is about. The truth will out. We have got to speak the truth."

Shadow Defence Secretary Liam Fox said: "When I was in Iraq, soldiers told me the same thing."

"They said the reaction had gone from welcome, to consent to mere tolerance and they said that this meant we didn't have an indefinite licence to be there."

"To have one of our senior military figures speaking out on behalf of those under his commenad is a refreshing change."

"General Dannatt is completely right to say that it's a scandal ro have injured servicemen on mixed wards with civilians."

Liberal Democrat Foreign Affairs spokesman Michael Moore said: "This is the frankest assessment we have had about Iraq. It illustrates that the government has no clear strategy."

The party's defence spokesman Nick Harvey added: "This drives a coach and horses through the government's foreign policy."
I don't think they'll be able to force him out of it without causing a hell of a scandal. He might wind up in the woods having committed suicide, but somehow, I doubt it. Generals are rather harder to intimidate than scientists and civil servants. :wink:



After years and years, AT LAST someone at the top, who makes the headline on the news, has had the b@lls to stand up and be counted.

I knew the CGS when he was a Bde commander and was always really straightforward and what he said was always intelligent. I just think he has had enough of politicians raping HIS army, and has decided to do something about it.

If he gets the sack, watch out for fireworks- If he has had the balls to stand up for us, we should do the same.


War Hero
Book Reviewer
BBC News just said that CGS comments were 'on tape' and that the Mail stood by their report. Does this suggest that the comments weren't actually made by CGS in the expectation that they would be published?
In other news, the PM is reported to be taking a new and unexpected interest in the appointment of the new Defence Attache to Greenland. ;)

Unless of course this is all a dream and I will wake up in a pool of vomit?
I think even Teflon Tony is going to find it difficult to weasel his way out of this. If Sir Richard goes it's time for a coup.
The most impressive comments I have heard from someone of his seniority for a long time.

I bet the politicians are confused by someone at their level telling the truth, rather than getting clearance from a spin doctor.

But I do wonder what his next OJAR will say...? Good on him.
I suspect that we attach too much weight to what most civvies will see as 'a bloke in uniform' commenting, but it is nonetheless reassuring: let's see what the reaction is. I bet Blair et al will, if they've any sense, ignore it in the first instance...
Would the CGS actually say this on the record? I've heard he is straightforward, but I'm amazed if this is as it appears..

The Downing St pr machine must be running at about 6000rpm at the minute..
Dicky Dannatt is a very political creature - he will have said this in full knowledge of the likely impact. He gets my vote! Anyone care to disagree with him? We were lied to when it all started and we are still lied to today! The Dear Leader should resign now – the Basta*d
Politicians can't grasp the idea of someone telling the truth, they'll all just assume he is chasing some kind of agenda. (Arguably, pursuing the truth and bringing the boys home is his agenda!)

This might turn out to be one of those moments when the world turns and Governments fall; I certainly hope so!


War Hero
Book Reviewer
My earlier point exactly. I suspect CGS will be having an interview without coffee with CDS.
But there is one danger of withdrawing from Iraq. If it then gets worse all those oriinally against the war or now demanding UK withdrawel will then start saying... "My God, how awful, we must go in and do something!"

Seriously though, I was also glad to see his comments about the importance of faith in society.

I will be buying the Mail tomorrow... for the first time in years.

Similar threads

Latest Threads