CGS Opens Diversity Conference

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by Legs, Oct 14, 2008.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Army's top general makes history by addressing conference on homosexuality

    The head of the British Army has made military history by addressing a conference on homosexuality, The Sunday Telegraph can reveal.

    As a member of the Army LGBT forum I was honoured to meet the CGS and speak at this conference. The Army (and the Forces as a whole) have changed dramatically over the last few years, and this is one aspect of the change that is positive.

    Anyone can be proud to serve his or her country, and it doesn't matter what your gender or sexuality, nor the colour of your skin, or the type of religion you practice we all have a place in todays Army (or RN or RAF....) - shame about the photo which makes CGS look camp!
  2. B_AND_T

    B_AND_T LE Book Reviewer

    He's trying to blend in!
  3. Very true, attitudes have changed an awful lot, it is almost unthinkable that less than 10 years ago we refused to employ people on the grounds of homosexuality. There are a few dinosaurs around who remain bigotted (as there are in society as a whole) but their numbers are decreasing.

    This increased acceptance of peoples differences is perhaps the single most positive change of the decade.
  4. msr

    msr LE


  5. What a saucy-looking General.
  6. ugly

    ugly LE Moderator

    Well Bu&&er me rigid whats the army coming too?
  7. Where do you stop though? There are some differences that should not be accepted yet they are at present in almost exactly the same position as gays were 20-30 years ago.

    Does this mean that in 20 years time we will see the then boss doing the opening speach at the kiddyfiddlers/necrophilicas/scatologists annual general meeting?

    IMO This may turn out to be the thin end of the wedge which the military will come to rue.
  8. I think the big difference is that the law of the land says that it's perfectly ok to be a flamboyant dresser or to go from man to Mandy. It's a bit of a stretch to say that we'll be recruiting the Glitters soon.

    In these time of manpower stretch and the considering the eternal problem of recruiting can we really afford to turn our backs on whatever the percentage of the population homosexualists and the like make up?

    In any case I strongly suspect that the percentage of gays, bi's and trannies in the Armed Forces hasn't changed one bit from what it was fifty odd years ago. The only difference now is that we don't criminalise these people.

    Edited to add If this is a wah I knew it all along.
  9. cpunk

    cpunk LE Moderator

    In the event that paedophilia and necrophilia are legalised and become accepted by society, then no doubt the army will have to learn to embrace it, though it strikes me as somewhat unlikely. As far as I'm aware, 'scat' is legal now though my guess is that most practitioners keep fairly schtumm about it.

    The fact is that homosexuality has been part of military life since the dawn of time, and what happens in bed between consenting adults has little or no effect on military efficiency, under most circumstances. Problems do arise because of sexual relationships in the military, but in my experience the problem is caused by the sexual relationship itself, and whether it's homosexual or heterosexual is usually immaterial.
  10. Rubbish, that is ridiculous sensationalism - there is a huge difference between homosexuality and necrophilia and to use that argument is outrageous.

    Are you seriously arguing that we should encourage the marginalisation a large section of society who could potentially do a good job in the forces because they are gay because it is the 'thin end of the wedge', leading to an Army of necrophilia?

    If you are sir, then take yourself outside, give yourself a hearty talking to, and come back later.
  11. You are very probably right on the numbers but it is not the point, there are probably the same number of other "differently aligned" people as well but does that make it right?
  12. I am saying that having changed the law once to allow or even encourage one form of sexual identification then whats to stop the same thing happening for those who are now seen as perverts, much as gays where a few years ago.

    Lets not forget that in some parts of the world all of what we would condemn are perfectly legal activities so why not allow them to join HMF and parade themselves proudly in the streets?
  13. Steven, are you in fact Gareth Keenan?
  14. Steven,

    We are not talking about deviants, we are talking about homosexuals. I have to concur with cpunk on the point that it is not usually the sexuality of the individuals involved that causes the problem.

    Yes, different things become acceptable over time and thus laws are amended and that happened with homosexuality. Do you really think that society is about to say that paedophilia and necrophilia are acceptable?

    You are staggeringly out of kilter with the rest of society, the one we recruit from and the one to which we shall eventually return, you should really consider revisiting your views on this issue.
  15. Just because it is made legal doesn't make it right.

    Difficult point to defend without going into slavery, Nazis, religion and the like but I hope you get the point.

    Our forebearers* wouldn't recognise or accept the forces as they are now but we in our wisdom now say they were wrong.

    *obviously the more flamboyent members might be fine with it.