Doubtless a reasonable reply in your view. As regards your last paragraph if you have additional evidence shouldn't you forward it to the Australian judiciary?I do believe the Catholic Church intervened as I have never seen this happen before.
So you are calling the accusers ‘scrotes’ because of what? They laid claim to being abused by Pell but they are scrotes because their evidence resulted in a squashed conviction?
Just because he has been freed does not mean he didn’t bugger kids, he might not be guilty of it right now, same as the accused are not guilty of lying (or being ‘scrotes’).
Would you therefore be in favour of the Alison Saunders approach to some crimes?
As for your first paragraph, it's unlikely to be the church intervening, far more likely the Illuminati and Freemasons. Have you checked whether he's one of them?