Call for views on recrutiment by Defence Committee

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by Pogo, Apr 23, 2008.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Defence Committee
    Select Committee Announcement

    Committee Office, House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA

    2 April 2008


    The Armed Forces Community is being invited to offer views direct to Parliament on the subject of military recruitment and retention in a new web-forum opened this week by the House of Commons Defence Select Committee.

    The Committee has recently launched a new inquiry into the issues that affect recruitment and retention in the Armed Forces and is inviting key MoD officials and commentators to give evidence. However the Committee is also taking advantage of a relatively new web-based system that allows Members of Parliament to hear views from the public using simple on-line web-consultations.

    Chairman of the Committee, James Arbuthnot, says "During this inquiry we want to hear views on recruitment and retention from former and current Service personnel and also from more diverse sources—religious leaders, parents and guardians and careers guidance councillors. We want to know what motivates some people but not others to join the Services and what factors can affect people's desire to remain in uniform over time. We are especially keen to investigate the disconnect that exists in the number of recruits from ethnic minorities who choose to join the Services."

    The UK Armed Forces are already under pressure supporting major operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. This pressure will increase if the MoD cannot recruit enough new personnel and retain established, serving personnel. The Defence Committee highlighted these issues in its recent Report, Ministry of Defence Annual Reports and Accounts 2006-07 (Fifth Report of Session 2007-08, HC 61), noting that the Army had trouble meeting its overall recruitment targets, and some specialist trades were particularly under-staffed. The Committee was also concerned that the MoD had failed to achieve most of its diversity targets, particularly with regard to the recruitment and retention of people from ethnic minorities.

    The Committee wants to hear from current Service personnel, from those who have recently left the service, and from those who are considering joining. They are also keen to hear from the families and mentors of former, current and future recruits.

    Full anonymity is respected on the web forum which can be found at on the Defence Committee's web page. The forum will run from 2 April 2008 until 21 May 2008.


    The Committee was nominated on 13 July 2005. The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies.

    Specific Committee Information: Tel 020 7219 5745, email:
    Committee Website:
    Watch committees and parliamentary debates online:
    Publications / Reports / Reference Material: Copies of all select committee reports are available from the Parliamentary Bookshop (12 Bridge St, Westminster, 020 7219 3890) or the Stationery Office (0845 7023474). Committee reports, press releases, evidence transcripts, Bills; research papers, a directory of MPs, plus Hansard (from 8am daily) and much more, can be found on

    The Members are:

    Rt Hon James Arbuthnot (Chair) (Con) (North East Hampshire) Mr Adam Holloway (Con) (Gravesham)
    Mr David S Borrow (Lab) (South Ribble) Mr Bernard Jenkin (Con) (North Essex)
    Mr David Crausby (Lab) (Bolton North East) Mr Brian Jenkins (Lab) (Tamworth)
    Linda Gilroy (Lab) (Plymouth Sutton) Mr Kevan Jones (Lab) (North Durham)
    Mr David Hamilton (Lab) (Midlothian) Robert Key (Con) (Salisbury)
    Mr Mike Hancock (Lib Dem) (Portsmouth South) John Smith (Lab) (Vale of Glamorgan)
    Mr Dai Havard (Lab) (Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Richard Younger-Ross (Lib Dem) (Teignbridge)
  2. Thanks for the spot, Pogo!

    It's certainly very interesting reading, and I look forward to lots of informed opinion on this site as comments are pulled apart.

    I'd like to see the serial whiners here on ARRSE actually commit to the site that Pogo has identifed - looks like a good opportunity to vent some spleen!
  3. Have tried to post on this site but my efforts have yet to appear. I will don tinfoil hat and wait for 'them' to storm the shed!
  4. Yeah, it should-quite interesting!
  5. Good spot loggie, keeping it bumped.
  6. It's been here for a while already.
  7. ooooooooops! Where are all our serving chest-pokers?

    Come on Guys and Girls, this is your chance to get heard!
  8. Well thats crap - I tried to put in a new topic so that I could make 'constructive' comments on the failure of Op OAR but it won't let me.

    You can only comment on the 3 questions already posed.