Wasn't his original sentence life? Given his repeated reoffending, I'm surprised they keep letting him out.
Perhaps someone in the criminal justice system has taken a great dislike to him, and is hoping that he'll be clocked (or perhaps mistaken for a paediatrician) by some Sun reader somewhere, and burned alive in a 20' wicker phallus.
Non-story, he's done his bird, once he's cracked his less than salubrious internet activities he should be afforded continued resources and protection. Or are all the polyester slacks wearing arrse Brigade still advocating one rule for one and one for the other?