Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by hackle, Jan 23, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. This is about the BAFF 10 Point Plan (2006). For the latest about British Armed Forces Federation visit .
    The "10 Point Plan" below was originally published here on 23 January, 2006 as a draft for comment. It was later included in a submission to the House of Commons Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill, and was printed as evidence in the Select Committee's Special Report of Session 2005-06, published 9 May 2006.

    The public launch of BAFF as a tri-service all-ranks professional staff association took place in London on 11 December 2007. The BAFF website at includes a copy of the Federation's actual Constitution, and much more. cheers, BAFF

    [hr]The BAFF '10 Point Plan'.

    1. A professional staff association is to be formed for members of Her Majesty's Forces under the provisional title of the BRITISH ARMED FORCES FEDERATION (BAFF).

    2. Comparable bodies have for years served the armed forces of allied countries such as the United States and Australia, with official cooperation and no negative impact on operational effectiveness or military discipline. The proposed federation is, however, designed to be a specifically British solution for the British armed forces. It will reflect and respect the ethos and robust traditions of the three fighting services. It will meet all requirements of British military and other law, including international conventions adopted by the United Kingdom.

    3. The federation's mission shall be to represent, foster and promote the professional, welfare, and other legitimate interests of all members of the federation in their capacity as serving or retired personnel of the fighting services of the United Kingdom, and in so doing help to maximise operational efficiency and improve the retention of trained personnel.

    4. The federation will be a democratic representative institution answerable to its members. Membership of the federation will be open to all personnel irrespective of rank, branch of service or gender. The main membership categories will be Ordinary Membership (Regular), Ordinary Membership (Reserve Forces) and Veteran Membership. In responding to the requirements of its members, the federation will act in the interests of all serving personnel and veterans but will not countenance any pressure on individuals to join.

    5. Within resources, the activities of the federation may include:

    (a) professional and career development by the provision of education and information;

    (b) liaison, monitoring and response to proposals or developments within the Services, in Parliament, in the provision of public services or in the commercial sector which have a specific impact on forces personnel;

    (c) appropriate advocacy and consultation to protect and improve the conditions of service life including pay, accommodation, medical and welfare services, resettlement and all other areas of personnel support;

    (d) appropriate support to personnel facing court martial or other legal proceedings in connection with their service (the federation will not normally comment on any specific case within the systems of military justice and administrative discipline); and

    (e) the negotiation for members of a range of insurance, financial and other benefits, discounts or affinity deals.

    6. The federation will not be beholden to any political party, pressure group, or defence industry interest. While supporting the cross-party consensus on the need for robust, adequately-funded but cost-effective forces serving the Nation as determined by the Government of the day, the federation will not be a defence pressure group. The federation will not take a view on matters of defence strategy or operational decisions, although it may raise legitimate subsidiary matters affecting personnel. Parliamentary liaison will be strictly on a cross-party basis.

    7. The federation will not be a trade union and, above all, it will not conduct or condone any form of industrial action or insubordination within the armed forces. The federation affirms the vital role of the Armed Forces chain of command in representing the interests of its personnel. The federation will seek to agree with the Ministry of Defence appropriate mechanisms for the exchange of information with the chain of command as well as centrally. A code of conduct will be adopted, and potential disagreements will normally be raised centrally to avoid placing serving personnel in difficulty with their chain of command, or vice versa. The federation will act to protect serving members in their federation-related activities within the agreed code of conduct.

    8. The federation will not seek to supplant the role of any existing charity or other agency involved in service welfare. Where appropriate the federation may help to direct members to appropriate sources of advice or assistance.

    9. Work is already under way on matters such as the structure and legal format of the federation, and staffing. A business plan is being prepared.

    10. This draft statement of intent outlines the basic principles established so far. Work continues on detailed aspects of the proposals with a view to wider consultation throughout the armed forces community, and with the Ministry of Defence.
  2. Do this as a wiki - the original one that is and not the ARRSE version.
  3. A commendable piece of work Mr Hackle!

    Sounds like a well thought out out-line for the BAFF.

    Keep up the good work
  4. When's all this supposed to happen? I hate unions!
  5. Absolutely first-class job, hackle, I must say. However, I'm not quite clear on what I've highlighted in Point 4. Of course, it could be I'm just a bit of a mong about it (being Irish - leave off with the usual jokes, lasses and lads, I'm serious!). Any chance of clarification?

    As it stands, I'd certainly put my name to it!

  6. Outstanding work

    As I understand it nobody will be forced ie no closed shop to join however they can still expect the benefits. is this right?
  7. cpunk

    cpunk LE Moderator

    You would benefit from the general advocacy of a Federation but if you didn't join, you couldn't expect to receive benefits like advice, legal assistance and so forth.
  8. If the various MP's actually stood up for the military this wouldnt be an issue.
  9. Yes, it just means that the decision to join is voluntary (of course) and there is to be no pressure on anyone to join.
  10. No pressure to join but, if you did join you would be provided with advice, legal assistance and other benefits that non-members wouldn't. All members of the Armed Forces should be treated the same and there is the possibility that 'the powers that be' may treat individual cases differently based on whether the individual is or isn't a member of the federation. And that's wrong.
  11. 2359 hrs (Zulu) on Tuesday, 22 August

    BTW this proposal is not a union! Absolutely everyone has said that from the start. The comparable organisations in Australia (one federation) and the USA (several associations) are not unions either.
  12. Aah, gottcha! Thanks for that, hackle. :D :D :D

  13. But they don't, T6! They don't give a toss about the UK Armed Forces - that's why it definitely is an issue!

  14. cpunk

    cpunk LE Moderator

    Cobblers. You don't expect the AA to give you a tow if you aren't a member do you? This is much the same.
  15. My point wasn't the fact that you aren't getting the help if you aren't a member, but the fact that if two soldiers have similar problems, the one that was a member might be treated better by 'the management' than the other, purely because he has the potential backing of the federation...... and that's wrong.