An individual commits an offence and is charged by the civvy police....why can the Army still charge that individual with "Bringing the Army into disrepute"? Who decides how and why the Army has "been brought into disrepute" or is it as it seems, that soldiers can be charged with the same offence twice, just in a different guise. Employers in civvy street have very little, if any, jurisdiction over their employees outside the workplace. How long can we still be treated differently??? Why can soldier's careers and postings be affected by these decisions???