woger wabbit
Old-Salt

You are stark raving mad, do you know that Verhoffstat wants the EU to become an Empire??Agreed, I'd go one stage further and push for full integration into a USE.
You are stark raving mad, do you know that Verhoffstat wants the EU to become an Empire??Agreed, I'd go one stage further and push for full integration into a USE.
Poor BB, here let me help.Have a like for your Dickensianesque extended metaphor.
Now fcek off, I do the purple prose in this thread!![]()
Dickensianesque, you say?Have a like for your Dickensianesque extended metaphor.
Now fcek off, I do the purple prose in this thread!![]()
'Tis only fair that His Imperial Excellency Mong, he of the purple smoke, have a domain of his own from which to inspire the world.You are stark raving mad, do you know that Verhoffstat wants the EU to become an Empire??
Would an act that was voted for by 498 to 114 be binding?UK referenda are non-binding. Them's the rules (unless the legislation says otherwise, viz the AV referendum). I struggle to understand why you don't know that fact.
Let me get this right, it was an advisory referendum? And yet, based on this advisory referendum, Parliament enacted A50, meaning that they'd chosen to honour the result, the 2 major parties went to election in 2017 with honouring the result as part of their manifesto and it's still advisory?UK referenda are non-binding. Them's the rules (unless the legislation says otherwise, viz the AV referendum). I struggle to understand why you don't know that fact.
I prefer the Scottish version......'rebellious Scots and awe rhat'.Bit like our own.....
Only inasfar as it is not altered by later legislation. Still a separate question to the point I was addressing about referenda.Would an act that was voted for by 498 to 114 be binding?
It is as boring as you have become.It's great theatre.
that’s not binding though, is it?This one has been done to death. It was clearly stated that the results would be respected. Not only that but we had a GE where the Labour and Tory parties both stood on manifestos that stated they would honour the results. We also had a parliamentary vote on it which was passed.
I see you are beginning to understand.Let me get this right, it was an advisory referendum? And yet, based on this advisory referendum, Parliament enacted A50, meaning that they'd chosen to honour the result, the 2 major parties went to election in 2017 with honouring the result as part of their manifesto and it's still advisory?
And we'll have less of those allusional puns as well, young man I can't be nasty to intelligent Remainers. I have form for being an irrational, racist, BREXIT gammoneer you know.Dickensianesque, you say?
Ah, such masterpieces as
Bleak House of Commons,
Hard Times (Ahead), and
A Tale of Two Britains (or three, or four ...)
Each to his own.It is as boring as you have become.
Ireland is no longer the place the hard core Boyners want it to be.It won't happen - look how much reunification cost Germany - the ROI couldn't afford it. Plus, a united ROI will get it's own version of the troubles, with Protestant high explosive marketing.
Wordsmith
If it was advisory, why didnt they just fùck it off, instead of voting to go forward? Cowardice?I see you are beginning to understand.
It is my belief that as Scottish independence would affect the whole of the UK all citizens must be given the right to vote on this question, it would probably mean the Scots would get their independence .I would be 100% happy to see Jockland have as many Referndums they want as long as they vote for Independece and give us all a break from their incessant McWhining.
It would probably mean the Trump would get his wall.It is my belief that as Scottish independence would affect the whole of the UK all citizens must be given the right to vote on this question, it would probably mean the Scots would get their independence .
Ah, now I understand. So it was rescinded and had nothing to do with any referendum? Sorry for my daft questions.Only inasfar as it is not altered by later legislation. Still a separate question to the point I was addressing about referenda.
I've a thought that people like JRM knew that Bercow would do what he's done.Bercow starting to get it with both barrels from the back benches, on both sides.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Is Nigel Farage's conduct of the General Election putting Brexit at risk? | Current Affairs, News and Analysis | 3 | |
![]() |
Brexit: Royal chips in ( pic page 3.) | Brexit | 7 | |
![]() |
Trump: Boris Johnson's Brexit will hamper future trade with UK | Brexit | 39 |