That’s because machines are programmed to look for limited parameters and it’s why you use humans to interpret what they show. We have been led to believe that machines are the way forward and have cut manpower and the interpretational skills based on the fact that the scientist/CEO is worth so much more. But machines can’t ask questions or probe deeper. From the health point of view you’d be forgiven for thinking that everyone has a rare disease, the vast majority don’t, but that doesn’t justify expense does it. ?
How long will it be before the Krauts start to complain about the 'out of this world' disgusting pay cheques that EU leaders are pocketing at present! Check out Barnier and Junkers on Google! quite unbelievable!
Data means bugger all in this instance. I’d love to know how they came to that conclusion? The huge mistake is to think that machines can replace the human. This is a time clearance thing designed to suit ports rather than security, in other words a trade off, and this is what we have all the time. This together with pressure groups designed to undermine the authority in the name of absolute rights can only lead to disaster ultimately.