Brexit Phase Two - Trade

Perhaps cloth bomber would benefit from some CBT, or heavy medication?

unfortunatly sad sacks your way out on my age along with so much else.
I’m not the proven multiple identity fibber spending my life on here. Or that sad little shit over the water. Who just can’t help being an unpleasant fantasist.You do know when you won site penis the difference between being laughed with and laughed at don’t you?
That was rhetorical as back in the not worth reading bin you go.[/QUOTE]
That's a bite

You repeatedly point out that you have me on ignore, yet the first time I mention you, a teary rant ensues.

I actually feel a bit sorry for you.

Carry on
 
END OF MERKEL would trigger 'uncontrollable' EU-wide break-up: Europe fears 'nightmare'

THE biggest threat to the EU is the imminent collapse of Angela Merkel's fragile coalition, which would lead to a Europe-wide breakup "in an uncontrollable way" according to a leading left-wing and pro-EU commentator.


PUBLISHED: By Oli Smith, EXPRESS.CO.UK, on Monday 18 June 2018.

END OF MERKEL would trigger 'uncontrollable' EU-wide break-up: Europe fears 'nightmare'
Titter ye not but there's a striking similarity between Angela Merkel and Frankie Howerd. Perhaps there was some top secret post-war initiative to improve the German sense of humour...

1529425893137.png
 
Last edited:
Barnier now saying we can't stay in the European Arrest Warrant scheme.

It just seems that they have a timetable pre-planned to announce we can't remain in anything post Brexit.. whats the point of negotiating.

Just tell them to fcuk off, shove their 40 billion quid leaving bill up their hoop and resort to a hard border with the Republic and WTO rules regarding trade.
So what's wrong with extradition agreements already existing?
 
So what's wrong with extradition agreements already existing?
Extraditions to any EU nation fall under the European Arrest Warrants scheme.

"Part 1 of the Extradition Act 2003 (the ‘2003 act’) implements the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) framework decision. The EAW applies to extradition between the following territories (designated as ‘category 1 territories’ under the 2003 act):"
 
As ever, you choose to be selective.

The solution put forward by the EU does not meet the criteria required by HMG.

Therefore, as far as U.K. PLC is concerned with respect to the border in Northern Ireland, this is not a viable solution.

So I suggest you go back to the drawing board and actually consider what HMG is trying to achieve.

In case you had missed it, the EU have tabled their own solution to the border issue that removes the need for physical infrastructure and is agreed by HMG, commonly known as staying in the Internal Market and Customs Union.

1/10, you must try harder. ^^
That, as a chap I know used to say, is the answer to a different question.

let me try another way.

is there a technical solution that avoids a hard border?

why do you think that the EU solution is for that part of the UK to remain in the internal market and customs union rather than them requiring a set up as proposed in their paper?

I have no intentions of going back to any drawing board thank you. Your undivided tendention is reward enough.
 
Sterling self deception there from the Duty Fantasist. Well done! ^^

View attachment 338904
“all our cash” ^^
Or there's this one:



Raoul Ruparel (yes I had to look him up, apparently he is a special advisor to David Davis on his mission to exit the EU) has come up with the UK having to spend some 22.5 billion a year to the EU in things like tariffs, export duties and payments to regulatory bodies.
As Mr Ruparel himself has put it, UK will be spending some 22.5 billion a year to save 8.5 billion.
Loads left over for the NHS, then.
 
Or there's this one:



Raoul Ruparel (yes I had to look him up, apparently he is a special advisor to David Davis on his mission to exit the EU) has come up with the UK having to spend some 22.5 billion a year to the EU in things like tariffs, export duties and payments to regulatory bodies.
As Mr Ruparel himself has put it, UK will be spending some 22.5 billion a year to save 8.5 billion.
Loads left over for the NHS, then.

Yes, but sovereignty and dark blue passports.
 

Wordsmith

LE
Book Reviewer
Sterling self deception there from the Duty Fantasist. Well done! ^^

View attachment 338904
“all our cash” ^^
It would be tedious to point out that much of the £8.6 billion net we fork over to the EU goes into improving the infrastructure of countries like Poland, Greece and Roumania, enabling those countries to better compete commercially with the UK in world markets. I can't recall many other business models where you pay money to your competitors to help them become more efficient.

Other parts of our contribution go into the CAP, which keeps French farmers happy and also markedly increases the price of food in the UK, in part because of import tariffs used to keep cheaper food from the rest of the world out of the EU.

Our net contribution does not include the costs of MEP's, advisers, interpreters and other hangers on. Not to mention the cost of them shuttling between Strasbourg, Luxembourg and Brussels because the EU parliament sits in three places as a grubby piece of pork barrel politics. I should also mention the completely unaudited expenses that these people have and the EU's habit of trying to silence whistle-blowers when someone periodically points out the corruption.

It would also be tedious to point out that part of the 0.7% of GDP that goes into our foreign aid budget is handed straight over to the EU, who then repackages it as EU aid. Instead of the UK getting political influence from that aid money, the EU gets the benefit of spending our money.

But apart from that, what have the Romans done for us?

Wordsmith
 
That will go down with all those other countries we wish to sign trade deals with and will destroy our unicorn exporting businesses.
Why.. Surely those other nations around the world we wish to have trade agreememnts with could see we're being shafted and recognise we're standing up for the rights of our citizens.

I thought a negotiation was a 2 way street.. it seems we say to Barnier we propose this idea..he then goes nope you take the EU's idea or fcuk off.
 
It would be tedious to point out that much of the £8.6 billion net we fork over to the EU goes into improving the infrastructure of countries like Poland, Greece and Roumania, enabling those countries to better compete commercially with the UK in world markets. I can't recall many other business models where you pay money to your competitors to help them become more efficient.

Other parts of our contribution go into the CAP, which keeps French farmers happy and also markedly increases the price of food in the UK, in part because of import tariffs used to keep cheaper food from the rest of the world out of the EU.

Our net contribution does not include the costs of MEP's, advisers, interpreters and other hangers on. Not to mention the cost of them shuttling between Strasbourg, Luxembourg and Brussels because the EU parliament sits in three places as a grubby piece of pork barrel politics. I should also mention the completely unaudited expenses that these people have and the EU's habit of trying to silence whistle-blowers when someone periodically points out the corruption.

It would also be tedious to point out that part of the 0.7% of GDP that goes into our foreign aid budget is handed straight over to the EU, who then repackages it as EU aid. Instead of the UK getting political influence from that aid money, the EU gets the benefit of spending our money.

But apart from that, what have the Romans done for us?

Wordsmith
Wow! 2016 again? Where did the years go?
 

skid2

LE
Book Reviewer
That's just peachy. Every so often I throw a few bob at Kickstarter mostly techie stuff.
This afternoon I get the news that thanks to our 'overvalued pound, settling out' (copyright some idiot on here). I've been informed that thanks to the pound dropping like a stone against the dollar, one of my Kickstarter deals due to be lifted at the end of June looks to be a hell of a lot more expensive.
 
Perhaps cloth bomber would benefit from some CBT, or heavy medication?

unfortunatly sad sacks your way out on my age along with so much else.
I’m not the proven multiple identity fibber spending my life on here. Or that sad little shit over the water. Who just can’t help being an unpleasant fantasist.You do know when you won site penis the difference between being laughed with and laughed at don’t you?
That was rhetorical as back in the not worth reading bin you go.[/QUOTE]


Calm down shakey. Still fantasising that being an aircraft mechanic fifty years ago makes you an SME on the intricacies of aviation after Brexit?
 
Last edited:
Extraditions to any EU nation fall under the European Arrest Warrants scheme.

"Part 1 of the Extradition Act 2003 (the ‘2003 act’) implements the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) framework decision. The EAW applies to extradition between the following territories (designated as ‘category 1 territories’ under the 2003 act):"
So in effect it remains in whether the EU likes it or not, to repudiate it is by definition and ecouragement of crime.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
CptDanjou Brexit 378
S11Blade Brexit 475
B Medals 22

Similar threads


Latest Threads

Top