Given that the LAW80 was a “wooden” round, why would that have been a problem?
..because at the end of the day, all ammunition and components have to be dealt with, preferably safely. Having at least some idea of what a round of ammunition is likely to do could literally be the difference between life and death..
The concept of a "wooden round" is a salesman's con IMHO. At some point, somebody, somewhere has to deal with components or sub components of these devices, and for folk to assume they do not need marking and documentation is bordering on criminal. The ability of the common soldiery (.. and officeiery!) to feck about with ammunition knows no bounds...
From a disposal point of view, 94s were a nightmare. Apart from the dodgy main armament, the fired launchers could quite easily contain unfired spotter rounds ( as a USAF EOD bod found to his cost in Kuwait!). You should NEVER mark up explosive items in a way that could cause confusion with inert ones..
The book says that "silver bullets" are inert, so for some idiot to put live silver bullets in a weapon system should be a hanging offence...
... and breathe!