From a completely theoretical point of view, is Bliar a danger to this country? Consider the failure of Iraq, the likely failure of Afghanistan and the home-grown terrorist threat. Also consider Bliar's response to any criticism of his world-view. He refused to accept a JIC report claiming that invading Iraq would increase the UK terrorist threat. Now, if Bliar is a danger to this country, should he be removed? How? I can think of a number of mechanisms: Removal at the Labour party conference 2006. Losing a vote of confidence in Parliament. Parliamentary impeachment. Arrest for misconduct in public office. Public demonstrations and civil disobedience calling for his removal. Detention in a secure hospital due to mental illness (megalomania, delusions). Kidnap, relase dependent upon his replacement. Removal in the Spencer Perceval tradition ie. assassination. My view is that, under the current circumstances, all except the last two are acceptable. How much further can the lunatic go? According to the Telegraph, he now wants to stay in No 10 until 2008.