Am back in Blighty for a few weeks and, having returned from the pub, I've been watching the coverage from Glastonbury and I'm puzzled. Although I'm a music fan, I have a little bit of difficulty in understanding why someone would pay £130 to chance the vagaries of the British summer which will pretty much guarantee that they'll be living like a Kosovar refugee for 3 days, but without the benefit of free food and drinking water being handed out. But that's an aside. You see, I'm an educated man, my mum says I'm brighter than average and I like to think of myself as fairly well cultured- that is to say that I'd appreciate it a lot more if Katherine Jenkins left opera to opera singers, took off the ball gown and just showed us her insides. What truly mystifies me is how Bjork can continue to have a career as a singer? Consider the evidence: - She's clearly as mad as a bicycle. - She's not even remotely good looking - She has no sense of rhythm - (Most importantly) She sounds like a deaf person trying to sing whale songs. Seriously, who the fcuk buys her music and who the fcuk listens to it? Is the sole reason for her continued ability to pollute the airwaves that she's a member of that club of uber-cool musicians that people pretend to like but don't really? (Beck, White Stripes, "World" Music artistes, 99% of any act even remotely connected to Andy Kershaw and the late John Peel etc.) Would it be wrong to wish for a resumption of the Cod War, just so we can get a couple of kicks in on Iceland for spawning this horrible fcuking creature?