Behavioural Conflict - Mackay & Tatham -Who is interested in Influence?

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by smallbrownprivates, Jan 12, 2012.

?
  1. Civilian - no mil background

    1 vote(s)
    7.7%
  2. Ex Regular - Civvy

    5 vote(s)
    38.5%
  3. Ex Regular in TA

    2 vote(s)
    15.4%
  4. TA service only

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Regular - not going places

    4 vote(s)
    30.8%
  6. Regular - going places

    1 vote(s)
    7.7%

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Following on from this thread http://www.arrse.co.uk/vbcms-comments/174946-article-behavioural-conflict-andrew-mackay-steve-tatham.html i have put together this poll to have a look at the backgrounds/circumstances of those who are expressing an interest in the recent book by Andrew Mackay and Steve Tatham looking at Influence and Soft Power within conflict.

    My ha'pennies worth:
    Non Grad Ex Reg Officer now in the TA, some staff training. Not really going places militarily - but the subject is very much of interest and value within my civilian job.

    Edit to add:
    will try to add grad/nongrad option on poll
     
  2. 30 yrs regular commissioned Army service (Infantry): didn't go places.

    (Possibly because I got interested in 'influence ops' - tho' we didn't call it that then - in a 'Black Bag' job, at HQ ARRC for B-H 1996 ;-D )