Charity says research dispels myth that wood burning, which has health risks, is a cheaper energy option
www.theguardian.com
Rachel Pidgeon, of the
charity Impact on Urban Health, which focuses on health inequalities in cities and which funded the study, said air pollution from wood burning in the UK had
doubled over the past decade, with serious consequences for people’s health.
Charity with an axe to grind produces report backing up what they believe.
Riddle me this.
If you have access to free wood, and can season it, how’s it more expensive than central heating?
I buy 1 metric tonne of smokeless fuel every November. It costs £500.
I burn that coal non stop from November to February. And when I say non stop, I mean non stop. Grate is shaken out on the morning with red hot coals left behind and the fire is banked for the day. Done again when I get back from work and again before night time. It stays on weeks at a time.
After about 1 week, the chimney breasts up stairs are like radiators on full belt.
Cost me £500 last winter in gas alone just for the combi boiler for hot water for the bath and shower. God knows what it would have been like had we had the central heating on. In fact we’re currently in a little battle with our energy provider who wants to up our direct debit payments even though we’re £600 in credit.
Our neighbours are a little less financially well off than us. They coped last year, and this year by burning a load of untreated pallets the husband gets from work in their fire.
We use our fire for out of vanity and necessity.
Our neighbours use it out of necessity.
These health concerns came from a study of air quality in ten the French Alps. The F*cking Alps, which are hardly known as a harmful environment to asthmatic’s.
Don’t use fossil fuels. Use bio fuels.
Bio fuels are bad. Use renewables.
Renewables don’t generate what we need. Use gas.
Gas is bad. Use hydrogen.
Hydrogen is bad. Use windmills.
I can’t help but think that somewhere along the line, the renewables sector who has used huge amounts of taxpayers money, use that and funnel it to the anybody who can put pressure onto forcing us to use their products.
We’ve had it with electric cars, forgetting that some of the biggest issues relating to particulate counts in the atmosphere come from the tyres and the brake pads wearing down.
No doubt somebody with a vested interest in a copper mine will come along and try and ban brakes and tyres soon because only their electronic braking system that doesn’t need brake pads, or expensive to manufacture tyres will solve the problem.
Rockefeller once owned Standard oil. He was able to exert his influence to ensure the safety expensive anti knock chemicals that only he manufactured were allowed to be used in competitors fuels.
Later transpired that his science was b0ll0cks and the off the shelf stuff they wanted to use was just as effective.