Back to the 90s - Oasis Vs Blur

Blur or Oasis?

  • Blur

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Oasis

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
#1
I always wanted to know people's preference on Oasis and Blur (in the 90's not now) and so i will kick off a pop battle.

I preferred Blur at the time, partially becuase i think that the gallagher brothers are a pair of nonce loving ******* who are full of their own shit, but mostly because Blurs music was more up beat and less depressing.

who did you prefer?
 
#2
Blur was for student fannies and Damon Alburn was and is just a mockney posh boy giving it the big geezer act. Liam is a c0ck Noel less so but they were by far the better band
 
#3
What difference does it make - you are at work - get working!!
 
#4
i can multi task
 
#8
azahpm said:
Oasis any day of the week, yes liam is a c*** and the pair of em' are arogant b@stards but thats what makes Oasis who they are. not forgetting they're simply portraying the English as they in fact 'are'. Ageed blur were good, but thats exactly my point. Were. they didnt stand the test of time now did they?
as above: who were better in the 90's? and besides, Oasis have been shite ever since the year 2000 reared its head
 
#9
zubrzycki said:
azahpm said:
Oasis any day of the week, yes liam is a c*** and the pair of em' are arogant b@stards but thats what makes Oasis who they are. not forgetting they're simply portraying the English as they in fact 'are'. Ageed blur were good, but thats exactly my point. Were. they didnt stand the test of time now did they?
as above: who were better in the 90's? and besides, Oasis have been shite ever since the year 2000 reared its head
In the 90's, still think OAsis had the edge, tracks like champagne super nova and go let it out will always be classics in my opinion, i do like Oasis but i agree that alot of there material is slightly depressing.
 
#13
Oasis........but only as I think that they peaked with their first album (which was amazing) and although whats the story was a very good album, what they had in their debut was never regained or bettered.

Blur (apart from a couple of good songs) generallly shite. Noel and Liam are twats but Damon Albarn is just a pretentious git with equally inflated ego as Noel G.

Johnny
 
#15
LINKY sorry shag but this is better..

Blur were shite and always will be
 
#16
sorry have to disagree, what exactly have oasis done recently?? all they're stuff has been shit and they're still riding on the wave off( what's the story) morning glory!! at least damon albarn has went on to do other just as good stuff(gorillaz) and liam marrying patsy kensit??? nuff said!!
 
#17
Blur were infinitely more superior. They kicked Oasis' arrse musically and lyrically, which I suppose is not hard considering Oasis' repertoire is one chord short of Status Quo.
 
#19
Cr33p said:
funny as fcuk though when noel got knocked on his arrse in canada
And then Liam pretended to be all hard as nails AFTER the bloke had been grabbed and hauled off.

The unexpected crowd surfing did make me laugh though.

Both kack - the Nightcrawlers were better :D
 
#20
JUST GOT A TEXT

"Can you get us two tickets for oasis next year at wembley, they go on sale at ten this morning"

No problem I thought

85 FCUKING QUID FOR THE SH=TTIEST SEATS. ALL THE WAY UP TO 175

Fcuk me I don't even really rate them, why the fcuk would I want to spunk that much to see a bunch of monkies.

Is this the standard go for gig tickets nowadays, am I mega out of touch. FFS if I was charging that much for a gig I'd definitely be scoffing industrial quantities of columbian marching off the breasts of numerous super models

85 fecking quid, get shanted and buy the cd instead

I voted for Blur because I saw them at that hall on queens road aldersh+t 1990 for about six quid
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Riverclerk The NAAFI Bar 40
polar Army Reserve 29
cabbage RLC 3

Similar threads

New Posts

Latest Threads