AV yes or no?

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by Abdiel, May 5, 2011.

  1. Yes it's progressive, it's the future.

    20 vote(s)
  2. No its to complicated, will lead to more underhand dealings.

    63 vote(s)
  3. Whats AV?

    6 vote(s)

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. A poll to see out of interest what is ARRSE's verdict on AV
  2. What the **** is AV?
  3. Audio Visual?
  4. Oh I see. I don't do politics. They're all shite.
  5. wedge_cadman

    wedge_cadman War Hero Reviewer Book Reviewer

    AV :thumright:

    ten letters thingy
  6. ****, Vaginal?
  7. It is a losers plan to allow tree huggers and other useless non workers like the Lib dems to always get a place on the tax payer funded gravey train.
  8. Close enough.

  9. What's AV = A ConVolutedness
  10. Why did Clogg not hold out for proportional representation?
  11. Arrse Ventures
  12. Can't we just have a No button, there's F all complicated about it, still doesn't stop it being dog **** though.

    Nice to see the Yes campaign crying all week that those for the No vote were up to dirty tricks and trying to personalize the campaign by turning it into a vote against Nick Clegg.
    Up here in Jockland the only poster you seem to see is one that says "Cameron wants you to vote No".
  13. Because he's a scumbag, no principled, turncoat.

    Not that I care for PR. Just addressing your question... in short: He's now a Tory. The Tories do not want PR.