Good tactics, always be evasive and change the subject when it becomes unpleasant. Also a special kind of cowardice, worthy of a French officer. If I were really twelve, you would have really embarrassed yourself now.Resorting to a meme ? Are you 12 ?
I'm content with that, but you have to take Macrons trusty dobbin Brigitte.And don't forget Brexit.
Like Waterloo you mean. Good idea as long as we take all the credit again and just have you lot turning up at close of play like last time. A lot more believable though now after the ravages of Mutti and Tante Ursula inflickted on the Bundeswehr.
Theres a giant butterfly on your head, stand still I'll get it.Not again, again!
![]()
Replacement choppers? Scrap all that Airbus/Eurocopter stuff and start from zero:
AH-64/WAH-64 instead of Tiger
H-92/AW101 instead of NH-90.
There are your working and reliable helicopters.
Germany is responsible for 2 world wars, several genocides as well as the import of over a million migrants into Europe in just one century.
Get back into your box, ever since you were created you brought pain, misery and destruction to your neighbours.
and how the Americans preferred the excellent products of French engineering.
Well it wouldn't be the first time a frenchman gets rogered by a german NCO.I some how don't think they will be making love.
Close of play? I think not.And don't forget Brexit.
Like Waterloo you mean. Good idea as long as we take all the credit again and just have you lot turning up at close of play like last time. A lot more believable though now after the ravages of Mutti and Tante Ursula inflickted on the Bundeswehr.
No it wasn't, because it was a lie. Did the Americans ever deployed a French weapon system?That must have been heartbreaking....
Gamine...the ouef on the left seems to be fitted for, but not with, boobies.
You may not have started the first one (heavily stressed may) but you were locked into a plan that had you go right flanking through a neutral country. Hardly cricket.Oh big french toyboy officer goes all teary eyed on me, fascinating!
The first one wasn't Germanys responsiblity it was yours, eager for Revanche for your 1870/1871 debacle. The second one we did start and Where does the million migrants come from? From your shitty country's little wars in Africa and Northern Africa.
After some hundred years your shithole brought pain, misery and destruction to your neighbours you've got your medicine back and you didn't like the taste a bit.
Grande Nation? My arrse, greatest turd in humans history.
To be honest everyone started it, the Austrians, Russians, Germans, French and the British not to forget the Serbs.You may not have started the first one (heavily stressed may) but you were locked into a plan that had you go right flanking through a neutral country. Hardly cricket.
What film could be better than this?Pilgrim Progress. It's only 4 percent but it seems to be hitting home quick enough.
Also, salt and pepper Pop Chips. SWMBO discovered them. Really, really nice.
Got a curry for later. I'm going garlic chicken. And probably some more ale. Mebbes watch a film.
Bull shite pure and utter bovine liquid wasteTo be honest everyone started it, the Austrians, Russians, Germans, French and the British not to forget the Serbs.
They all wanted war and they all staggered into it like drunks. They were all convinced that after a few glorious battles and a little bang, bang, someone would give up. They all misjudged bitterly and thus laid the foundation for the Second World War.
The march through a neutral country is therefore almost a footnote.
The Schlieffen Plan was so watered down that it could no longer function and the political and military realities no longer corresponded to those at the time of its conception.
Whether the French would really have respected Belgian neutrality in an offensive against Germany, I don't know, but I dare to doubt it.
No it wasn't, because it was a lie. Did the Americans ever deployed a French weapon system?
I know that they fielded the L7 as M68 as we did with the L7A3 and they took the Rh120 as M256. Then there was our TPZ1/A3 Fuchs as M93 Fox, but did they really ever take something French into service?
Ah yes, really fascinating.Bull shite pure and utter bovine liquid waste
only a German would deny the sins of their fatherland
call it empire envy, when they built one they committed genocide to prove they were just as brutal as the Belgians
Laying the blame squarely at Metternich whose ideas led Bismarck to fighting the Austrians Danes & frogs
btw you Cnuts couldn’t even take Moscow something the frogs did....
And this answers my question. Never had thought that the US adopted so much foreign equipment.Ever? If we ignore the Chauchat...
M1897 75mm cannon (AKA The French 75, before it became a drink) Mounted here in an M3 tank destroyer.
![]()
When modified to have a sliding breech block instead of the hinged one to become the 75mm guns M2 and M3, would be found as the primary weapon system of the M3 and M4 medium tank.
![]()
Not that the use of French armor was new. Renaults (and their derivatives) made up the bulk of the US's armor force.
Here's Patton.
![]()
Not a weapon system, but in use with the Armed Services
![]()
You can argue the Frenchness of Eurocopter.
![]()
But the Matra Durandal (BLU-107 in US service) is definitely French.
![]()
Granted, Euromissile's Roland wasn't an outstanding success, only one battalion fielded by the US.
![]()
The US Marine M327 120mm rifled mortar was basically the French F1.
![]()
There's probably more.
Get a dna test to see who in Russia are your relationsAh yes, really fascinating.
Could you, of course only as far as for you possible, sort your thoughts and repeat the whole thing again in complete and comprehensible sentences?
Thank you for your cooperation.
Well that is simple, no one. No russians in my part of the country until 1990/1991. But that really wasn't what you tried to express.Get a dna test to see who in Russia are your relations![]()
We buy all sorts of foreign equipment, but it’s not obvious because, even if we don’t modify it, we still rename it, and secondly, if its more than a couple of items (such as the Pandur APC from Austria) for strategic reasons it must be made in North America.And this answers my question. Never had thought that the US adopted so much foreign equipment.