ArmyNET Sharepoint

Discussion in 'Royal Signals' started by IS Ski Geek, Jan 21, 2008.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. IS Ski Geek

    IS Ski Geek War Hero Moderator

    Has anyone come into contact with ArmyNET Sharepoint yet? A number of units are now starting to create sharepoint websites within ArmyNET where they can disemminate useful info and so on. To access the site, log into into ArmyNET as per normal. When the main page opens, look in the Announcements section (top right) and follow the link for sharepoint. Once you're in there you need to read the blurb in there and carry on normal jogging. A few TA units have sites on there already and there is also a DCCIS site being developed in there and various bits of course information are being added all the time.
  2. Yes, been using it for a couple of months now, mainly for course info. Pretty handy.

    Unit stuff will be more interesting when it's used more widely.
  3. Its a really usefull tool for TA units, mine is spread over a large part of the UK and being able to share docs and other info would be great (and not be stored on a variety of work, home, TA pc's, USB sticks etc)
  4. I reckon one of the big advantages is that it allows unclas information to be accessed from pretty much anywhere. It doesn't matter if you're on CSV, DII/F, home internet,, welfare internet etc, you can browse to the same front page. One of the biggest obstacles in my opinion is the tendency for people to overclassify stuff as restricted. There's a DIN out at the moment which explains the use of UNCLAS-PROTECT and I suspect that careful use of the appropriate PM and caveat would allow far more useful information to go on ArmyNET. It also restricts access to valid members of ArmyNET and not the walts who come on here pretending to be Andy McNab.

    Defo very useful for TA, but also for training purposes and I also like the ability to create wikis (although difficult to control) and blogs. Let suggest for example that the OC is fed up with submitting a squadron's worth of wire notes every month, why not get the troopies to do a weekly blog? It's also far more flexible than a traditional website where you collate all your information and send it your webmaster to be converted and uploaded. This way as soon as something happens you can draw attention to it.

    One good thing about sharepoint when I was at my last unit was that people would upload a document and then send out a hyperlink. They would also post announcements on the Regt's main homepage, whereas the unit I'm at now just sends out vast amounts of spam email with pointless attachments. An information "pull" policy is miles better than one of "push".

    Sharepoint's a winner and I've been a fan for a while. If anyone needs further info PM me and I'll point you in the direction of a man who can square you away. The IS mob have already got their own little trade area on there, so there's no reason why others can't do the same.
  5. ^Have seen the IS mob area and it really sells sharepoint.

    Maybe the remainder of the mafioso community should embrace sharepoint as well as the FofS IS are?
  6. It's good to hear that Sharepoint is being embraced. I echo the positive comments made in this thread - it is a forward thinking way of doing business, especially for those units such as TA and independant units that have a wide geographical spread.

    IMHO any unit that takes the time to stand up a unit website within ArmyNET to better enable communcations should go the extra step and set up a sharepoint area so it can do its day to day routine business better too. There are bags of tutorials out there, and the ArmyNET team can offer technical advice, too.


  7. I don't think you need to bother with a unit website, just use sharepoint, its far easier to upload any announcements/news items straight to sharepoint.
    I administer a sharepoint 2 site @ work, all the routine do this, do that emails get stored on it, I reckon its saved us many hours.

    Its funny, however, seeing the increase of site requests after two recent arrse threads. ArmyNET also seems to be getting similar TA hits than the TA ARRSE forum, I think that will improve once ArmyNET has a TA Signals site (or one standing in its place) - the kids are far more IT/web aware than many officers and SNCO's, they try ArmyNET and then some get to ARRSE.

    p.s. After a butt kiss post... can I have my regts site now :D :D
  8. Unit sites still have a place - they offer a far more familiar way of accessing information on the web to those that are perhaps not so used to new ways of working. This does mean that such sites - as you point out - are slightly more demanding to maintain.

    Please PM me with your details for a regt site.


  9. thanks ... all sorted.
  10. Not seen an awful lot of action on the ArmyNET WSS sites recently. A couple of the TA ones look OK. Like the trade training site and the 38 Sigs one.
  11. I think part of the problem is ArmyNET, one or two Arrse users I've spoken to had lost their passwords or something similar.

    Is access to ArmyNET different via RLI? I read somewhere it was (but no specifics).
  12. Shouldn't be any different. From the RLI, it goes through the Enterprise Gateway Service, which is just a big proxy web server gateway thingummyjig.
  13. Is that different to IGS, was involved with a project that tried to resell to MOD IGS (NHS Net) as a new thing
  14. Yeah they just renamed IGS as EGS and changed a couple of the security rules, but nothing major. Probably just enough to rip off the taxpayer for a few squillion quid.
  15. Whilst I won't disagree with the rest of your post, your point in bold needs countering!

    I can hear a friend of mine ranting about this when he says "How do I know what I don't know and how do I go looking for information that I don't know about?"

    He has a very good point and makes it far more eloquently than I can - and he runs a website. The Services have always been a "push" organisation and the recent and unannounced change to a "pull" organisation is not a good one, IMHO.