Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by Baddass, Feb 19, 2004.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Whilst having a chin wag with a colleague today, I was informed that the Army need to shed 5000 jobs as we are overstrength.

    Can someone shed some light here? I always believed that we were 5000 short.
  2. The army is a very large and complicated animal and I don't know if the army is above or below strength at the moment.

    Just counting the number of soldiers is I suspect a huge over simplication of the problem. You have to have the right number of soldiers at the right place in the right job. You have to have the correct proportion of the army in training, the correct proportion at all rank levels and the right amount ready to leave.

    If we have all of a sudden managed to recruit a spare 5000 bodies and fill the gap, they'd all still be in training and operationally 'useless'. They might also have been recruited to fill the 'choice' trades leaving the infantry, armour and other arms still short of manpower. People may also be leaving quicker with the increase in Op tours and the improvement in the country's economy.

    Bums on seats don't make an army!
  3. X-Inf

    X-Inf War Hero Book Reviewer

    PP says "Bums on seats don't make an army!"

    I agree but it is the bums in Whitehall who can wreck it.
  4. Yep I agree,

    They have a great track record of screwing things up and no sign of the learning curve ever improving :x
  5. chimera

    chimera LE Moderator

    The Army is not having to shed 5000 people.

    Currently the whole Army is about 3000 undermanned (depending on whether you count FTRS, etc), with the trained soldier inflow exceeding outflow for the last couple of years by well over a thousand a year, and so the gap is closing.

    The problem that the Army currently has is that a combination of the recruiting surge going better than expected, and with voluntary outflow rates the lowest they have been since about 1996 (and still falling), we are in a position where we are 'not as undermanned as the bean counters thought we would be' therefore the MOD can't pay the wage bill! Hence the recent restriction on FTRS extensions, and allowing PVRs to leave early (both debated endlessly on other threads on this site). In fact some bits of the Army are overmanned - AGC (SPS) and Royal Armoured Corps being two examples. Check out the DM(A) webpages.