Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by Up_In_Arms, Mar 22, 2004.
The heart of the site is the forum area, including:
I recall the victory parade in London after the Falklands - many VIPS showing appreciation, as well as many members of the public.
Apparently the Dear Leader and his Entourage of Delight think that a parade would be inappropriate because it could appear triumphalist. He's such a sensitive soul, isn't he?
I suspect the truth is that he'd feel most uncomfortable with tanks and troops in Whitehall....... if only...
We (the armed forces) are tools weilded by our political masters, we will never be detached from them.
When talking fails we are the tool of the politicians
That's not quite what I meant. Yes, of course, the armed forces are a tool of the government in terms of who commands them.
I believe the point I was trying to get across was of perception. Do the public see the armed forces as something for the union to proud of, representing the union - or have we in recent years BECOME SEEN AS the personal tool of this government and THUS the focus of it's disdain at policy.
Unlike the US where the public can criticise Bush but hold a parade for it's troops.
Does that make sense. As a soldier why should I receive abuse in the UK street for serving my country?
VB, I think you raise an interesting topic.
Gulf Vets have been denied the public recognition given to vets of other campaigns. even the service at St Pauls was hijacked by a very political stance by the Archbishop of Canterburry, and therefore ruined. What arrogance!
Years ago the Yanks learnt their lesson and organised a Parade for the Vietnam Vets. I firmly support a parade for our GW2 vets. If a bunch of rugby players deserve it for earning big money running around on a field, what about our service personel?
I fear that Gulf vets will become OUR Vietnam vets. Unpopluar war, soap dodging protesters, abandoned by the government. The Yanks also learnt in Vietnam that "individual replacement" leads to stress as they failed to integrate into units. This IS the current policy as far as the TA soldier is concerned. I wonder what the long term effects of this policy will be.
When I got back, our aircraft was directed to a disused part of the airport so the civies couldn't see us. Welcome Home
Up In Arms wrote
It's the Government that's doing all the associating. Talk about unrequited love!?
Bliar and everyone else should remember that 'HM' prefixes 'Armed Forces' and what 'HM' stands for.
Much as he'd like to think he is, Dear Leader is not our Commander in Chief.
We may be tools of Government. This Government are just... tools.[/quote]
very good point
The American forces are far better paid, get benafits like no others....what do you british squaddie get ? SHITE !
No longer are we a fighting force of the british people we are a fightin force for the goverment and where ever there is political gain for them selves.
I am a serving soldier but do i feel that i would die for queen and country?
well yes i would if it was for the course of saving the UK or other assosiated comanwelth.....
But to be sent out to Iraq and possibly die for what corse?
so the oil can be sucked from them?
I DONT THINK I AM THE ONLY ONE WHO FEELS THIS WAY THERE ARE MANY MORE!
when was the last time the army put there foot down and said to the government.....swivel ! no longer are lads dieing for queen and country.
there dieing for the polatitions gain.....do we get looked after ? no
is the pay good ? no
Will there be a uprising with in the UK? you bet there will....just let all them immagrents in, its brewing it will happen they know it will happen...
the forces will be called upon to help sort it out, but by then where will the loyalty lie? ..........
Bit harsh mate but I feel somewhat the same.
Blair is in a quandry here, he is Labour and Labour have always hated the services. But he wants to be on the big stage as a world leader, so he has to use us! He wants that first president of the EU post and he is willing to sell out the UK and abuse the Forces to achieve a world leader role.
So we find ourselves posted here and there, fighting here and there. Losing good soldiers everywhere. Not getting recognition due to the new PC attitude in the UK, god forbid we would ever want to upset the regime we vanquished .
As long as Blair is in, forget parades, forget decent pay rises and get used to more conflicts in support of the US, more fiasco's like Gulf 2 and more penny pinching resulting in disbandment of regiments and redundancies resulting in greater overstretch!
But hey, all that money saved will help those poor IIs who are stroming across our borders! God bless them, every little one of them
i know it was a harsh statment but just wanted to make a point....
been looking at the BNP site...he he..has good opinions on there.
i just feel that we as service personel don`t get the reccognition due.
under paid over stretched....but the best !
if we are such an asset, why not treat us as so?
Well, actually i don't think the average British soldier is particularly underpaid when you look at the low cost of living he has. A LCpl posted in the UK recently told me he cleared £1000 a month after all his expenses including food, accommodation, and loans. On net of 1350 per month that is pretty damn good. If you don't believe me look at rent, bills, and costs in the civvie world.
If anything I beleive the problem of overstretch will have greatest affect on the family and private lives of the armed forces. It's hard enough as it is to keep relationships going as it is. All of my friends in my unit, as well as myself, broke up with our other halves by the time we had got back from the Gulf this time round. I'm sure that is a story that continues everywhere.
As for the BNP.... Stuff them. They don't care they're just trying to push buttons, don't fall for their racist cr*p.
At the same time we need the government to give serious public recognition to the work of the armed forces.
p.s. early morning - spellings gone to rat
never have been good at spelling.....never mind !
we are considerd the best army in the world..so why do we have to suffer?
one of the lowest paid, benifits of only few.
Do we get looked after when we become civies ?
no we dont, so why should we shine but get treated like dirt?
Makes the government look good though doesnt it !
You haven't got a clue, have you?
It took me about fifteen seconds work on Google to fnid this, which means you're either deliberately stirring it (hmmmm..... BNP reference earlier? maybe) or just not very bright.
You're wrong, they get paid significantly less than UK forces. See:
bright enough, stand corrected about te pay ...ok
but what they get benifit wise is far better than what we get is it not ?
any way is this thread about the Americans or the brit gov ??
Separate names with a comma.