Are we living in a police state????

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by mad_mac, Aug 3, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. I have been absolutely horrified by a recent incident which I will explain:

    My son, Mad Mac Jnr who is 14 years old has been enduring a term long disagreement with another school pupil, (of the same age and year) and on numerous occasions has, quite sensibly walked away when offered violence to solve the matter. My son finally had enough and punched the other pupil once in a hope that this would end the matter at the conclusion of the school term. The other pupil backed down and he assumed that this would end the matter.

    Imagine my surprise when the police came knocking at the door stating that there had been an allegation of assault (sect 47) against Mad Mac Jnr and could I accompany him to the station to take a statement at my convenience. Being a responsible parent I agreed.

    My surprise turned to one of indignation when on arrival at the police station he was formally arrested. I stated that he was at the station voluntarily under my supervision to give a statement. I was told that under the new SOCO powers arrest is now automatic and that he would be duly processed for fingerprints and DNA profiling.

    I objected to the DNA sample being taken for the following reasons:

    Keeping innocent people's DNA profiles on a Database permanently is an infringement of fundamental human rights.

    Keeping DNA permanently from people convicted of minor offences is excessive. There is no reason to think you might go on to commit the type of crime where DNA evidence might be relevant.

    I was concerned that permanent retention of this record might lead to Mad Mac Jnr being unfairly refused a job or visa in the future, or that it will be used to undermine his privacy, for example by investigating who he is related to.

    The database is being used for research purposes. Under the Human Tissue Act I should have to give my consent to genetic research and it is wrong to remove my right to refuse to take part in controversial research.

    I was not aware that private companies and others would be given access to the NDNAD for genetic research and I have not given my consent to this.

    I was told that the new laws stated that parental consent was not required if someone was placed under arrest even if the subsequent allegations were proved false and the data obtained would be kept permanently on file.

    I explained to the police that whilst I did not condone Mad Mac Jnrs actions I had a degree of sympathy with him and admired his self control. (when I was younger one punch was oft not enough to reinforce your point and on occasions our friendly school gym master used to issue the arguing pair with a pair of 16oz boxing gloves for an impromptu boxing match which resolved any differences and provided some damn fine entertainment for both teachers and pupils).

    I explained that this was a "schoolyard scuffle" and to carry out these procedures was oppresive and draconian. I pointed out to police that my parental justice would be ten times worse than anything the state could impose. The police were sympathetic and totally agreed with my point of view but also stated off the record that there hands were tied and they must be seen to carry out governmental policy with swift youth justice.

    I have been incensed to read similar incidents links as follows:

    DNA Taken

    I have also read a case of a 10 year old girl cited for criminal damage for chalking a hopscotch on tarmac. Can`t find the link though.

    Not only are we in danger of crimanalising an entire generation, but I have severe reservations about all the sh*tholes in the world we have all served to impose our ideals of democracy only to find out that the very country which we fight for has in my abscence turned into a police state. These new laws were imposed to aid the war on terrorism. That is obviously not the case and these laws are being abused by the Government and the police.

    I was also under the impression that a democracy was "police by consent".

    Welcome to the police state, where all the populations DNA profiles will at some stage be collected for litter dropping/motoring offences. I seem to remember someone`s post script stating " Someone should tell T Bliar that George Orwells novel "1984" was a fictional novel and not an instruction manual. The future populations DNA information is currently being collected on a non conscensual basis and by stealth.l

    I am currently writing to my MP and also the Chief Constable expressing my concerns on abuse of power.

    I would be interested to hear of other ARRSERS experiences and views on this sad politically correct society.

    From an enraged but responsible parent. Rant over until I take on the Government.
  2. Your son commited assault, and was arrested, deal with it
  3. If you vote Labour this is what you get.

    Murderers and rapists set free - school boys fighting arrested.

  4. So true. We voted for the government that we got. Time to stop the bitching and do something about it at the next election. :lol:

    Tony & Cherie........I have Pickfords number if you are interested :?

  5. Whilst I advised my son to admit to the crime, before you point out your simplistic views there was extreme provocation and mitigating circumstances involved. The subsequent charge was dropped to Sect 39 "common assault" which may be proved without physically touching anyone. (Blowing on someone may constitute common assault).

    My concern if you had read my post in its entirety was over stealth collection of DNA and abuse of police power.

    I will NOT get over it and by remaining silent is giving a tacit approval for this abuse of power to continue.

    I guess you never had a schoolyard scuffle, walked across farmers fields committing trepass, or "apple scrumped" as a kid thereby committing theft. If you are honest with yourself we have all committed childhood misdemeanours but were never criminalised for it.

    If this does not apply to you then I apologise, I have obviously missed the "Saviours" second coming.

  6. Totally agree fastmedic. How can a government expect parents to take more accountability and responsibility for thier offsprings actions in one breath and then take away parental responsibilty and consent in the next.

  7. whilst i applaud you for getting your son to stand up for his actions a crime is a crime, just because others get away with much worse doesnt mean what your son did is ok

    im not saying i havent done worse (i have), but if you get caught out i cant see how you can complain

    as with the collection of dna etc, its done for a reason, if you dont do anything wrong you have nothing to fear, the taking of DNA has solved many assaults, rapes, murders

    how would you feel if the shoe wereon the other foot and someone had belted your lad, im sure he would tell his dad he was provoked too

    the problem is that nowdays schoolboys fighting can mean a lot worse than it did 20yrs ago, and police need to take it seriously, and we moan when they dont
  8. Have you read my post!!!!

    My son has been indoctrinated with a sense of discipline and accountability and was man enough to own up to his actions. I applaud that as any responsible parent would.

    Chastisement by me was not a course of action to be followed in this case, as personally I agreed with his actions and the level of response which was taken. Being a responsible parent, I condemned his actions whilst secretly agreeing with his response. (The lad in question was not injured badly, merely suffering a minor bruise to the forehead contributed by one single punch).

    If you are not concerned about your DNA being taken that is your opinion. For human tissue to be used in genetic testing without consent causes me great distress.

    This government has already alluded to insertion of satnav microchips in cars enabling authorities to calculate time distance and speed over your set route (tracked by GPS Sat Nav) and establishment of automatic fines if speed limits are exceeded.

    What next, biometric id cards are on the menu, perhaps microchipping of your newborn prior to birth certification to allow for sat nav tracking and identification.

    If you are happy to live in this sort of society, please vote for the current government.

    Personally, I would rather have what little degree of personal privacy is available now. This is not sensationalism, but your civil liberties are being eroded drastically with the excuse that this is to fight terrorism.

    I may be cynical here, but why were these powers not established in the light of the threat from PIRA.

    I feel there is a hidden agenda here.

    As a post script I am not a lefty liberal but have served in all current operational theatres and have a full 22 year career behind me.
  9. In these troubled times, we all too seldom as ourselves the question: When it comes to protecting our children- What Would Mel Gibson Do?

  10. In answer to this, my lad has been subjected to bullying and has been punched in the past. This has always been dealt with by me or with liaison to the school and has not involved the police.

    Unless the attack was serious and sustained enough to cause concerning injury, I have always felt that approaching the other parents and the school was enough to sort it out. This has always been a common sense approach and if this does not work the police are the final resort!!!! I do not class myself as an educated man but as most of this forum has, I have a degree in the "school of hard knocks".

    I disagree that fighting is worse than 20 years ago. A punch now had the same effect 20 years ago. The knife culture now has always been in existence. I quote the razor culture in Glasgow, Teddy boys and razor blades in the 50`s and flick knives in the 70`s 80`s.

    Communications and media are a lot more effective and established to the great unwashed, nowadays, and the media latch on to certain trends.

    I fail to see how assaults are more serious in 2006 than they were in 1986. Police crime rate analysis will support my point of view.
  12. You miss the point. The basis for democracy is the will of the people. We pay for plod. They should do as we collectively say. They [in theory], like government [again in theory] are our servants. All else is dictatorship.

    The other side of your weak argument is 'if I havent done anything wrong why should a public servant be allowed to search/stop/fingerprint/DNA me without proving reasonable cause.

    I for one am opposed to the police having these powers.

    NB: ACAB.
  13. I state again.
    In a democracy policing is by consent.

    I agree with your point currymunter. The powers the police currently have were initially rushed through Parliament with no public debate. These were reinforced and amended in Jan 2006 due to glaring errors contained within the Statutory Instruments.

    I for two am opposed to these powers.

    Perhaps a question we can all ask ourselves is why are soldiers tried for murder. They are in a war zone which these accusers have no appreciation of, and war fighting has never appeared on thier agenda, whilst at home the police can shoot an innocent man 7 times in the head due to dark skin, ran so must be a terrorist and the head of the Metropolitan Police faces a Health and Safety lawsuit!!!!!!!!!!!

    Either the problem lies with our spineless Generals, feathering thier own nests as opposed to protecting thier soldiers they lead, or it lies with current Governmental policy (if you are a soldier or normal civilian you are guilty until proved innocent).

    Going slightly off tack but yet again this epitomises the disparity between Joe Bloggs and the current establishment.
  14. So the main point of this thread is that some completely random, ordinary soldiers sons DNA details are being held on file for all eternity for a "Charge Sheet", not even a conviction.
    Caused by a government that has lost touch with a sense of proportionality and seems to be following the US's lead, these kind of laws sound similar to recent American laws that deal with civil Liberties.
    They also seem to be becoming more right wing as every day passes and Well, either lauch a coup...... no didnt think so, not your stile, your better than that, or vote them out the next time and get your message across.

    Also, a side effect is that a soldier like all other soldiers is being shafted again, no surprise there lads, to be honest. It isnt fair but get over it. You are never going to receive the honour and respect that you deserve as men and women who have served their country and to be honest, would you have it any other way to a certain extent?

    Yes the MoD and general public should support you more when you have your backs to the wall and they are expecting too much and what cant be achieved from you. However you all signed up under the sense of duty and honour that you feel when you do your duty and if you were fully appreciated for what you do, would it be the same.
    What every serving soldier and former soldier does or did sets them apart from regular civilians and that is probably part of their motivation to serve. If that feeling was not there, serving and doing your duty would not carry the same weight.
    Yes you are under valued and yes you deserve better, but that is not going to happen unfortunately.
  15. You want to be careful making statements like that. Next thing you know, you'll be done for child abuse.