Anti-terror tactics weaken law

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by slopsjon, Feb 16, 2009.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Anti-terror tactics 'weaken law'

    BOLD And of course none of that is the fault of terrorism itself.
  2. Nowt wrong with that conclusion. Bush and Blair have done more to damage the image of the West as a defender of freedoms than Adolf Hitler. When they couldn't get you legally, they changed the law. 42 days banged up with no charges ring any bells?

    The aim of any terr group is to make you change, preferably in the way they want you to. If Terr's paint you as an oppressive state punishing a group for being that group and you change your laws to inflict punishment on that group, then they have won.
  3. This is reportedly Mr. Bush's high opinion of the US Constitution:

    He was told by Republican leaders that that trying to force through some parts of the 'Patriot' Act would further anger conservatives.

    “Mr. President,” one aide in the meeting said. “There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.”

    “Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”
  4. Your beloved President Obama called the US Constitution an "imperfect document" with "deep flaws" which doesn't exactly display a high regard for it either. Your point is?

    Do not think that the irony of vermin like you posting on a thread about anti terror laws is lost.
  5. Seems to say it all.
  6. Mr. Obama referred to a specific issue he had with the Constitution - the problem of slavery, which he believed was not dealt with by the Founding Fathers, “African-Americans were not -- first of all they weren’t African-Americans -- the Africans at the time were not considered as part of the polity that was of concern to the Framers...I don’t think the two views are contradictory, to say that it was a remarkable political document that paved the way for where we are now, and to say that it also reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day.”

    He did not infer the whole document should be ignored so as to give people less rights (as is definitely the case with the 'Patriot' Act), but that it could have been improved upon to give people more rights.
  7. Well now he is a reformed :roll: person he believe he can teach! America about democracy.
  8. Most of us do change from our twenties to our fifties, Halo.

    And those are Mr. Obama's words regarding the Constitution and what he regarded as its flaws, not mine. If the Constitution had abolished slavery, freedom would have been granted to more people, whereas the 'Patriot' Act seeks to constrict these freedoms.
  9. We spent hundreds of years trying to get away from the idea that the law was simply the will of the bloke in charge. What a bloody waste.