Another nonce - Sir Cyril Smith

Yes something like that in the 1970s, but aiui PIE campaigners wanted to lower the age of consent to 10. One of PIE's leaders allegedly admitted he was attracted to boys of 10-12 years old and would not deny having relations with them.

Lobbying by paedophile campaign revealed

BBC "It sounds like a nightmarish plotline from dystopian fiction. But this happened in the UK. The conference took place in Sheffield and the newspaper was the Guardian. The year was 1975".

Pro-paedophile activist guilty of abuse

Labour expelled a PIE campaigner (for the rights of paedophiles) a few years ago. He'd done time for distributing child pornography and for "conspiracy to corrupt public morals" before PIE was disbanded in 1984.

If I have it right, 'the dirty mac brigade' allegedly tried to normalise relations with kids, and to lower the age of consent 'for the sexual liberation of children', conflating padeophilia with gay rights and latching onto a prominent LGB campaign group.
I worked for a trade union back in the 80's going into the 90's. I was a full time lay official which means I was elected and my employer, in this instance a local authority, recognised me as the leading trade union official for a large section of it's workforce and I was the point of contact for all negotiations, disciplinary hearings, grievances and anything else that the employer wanted to discuss with it's workforce etc.

In the early years of doing this work, it was becoming commonplace for large employers to implement an equal opportunity policy and this was negotiated with us and after an agreement was reached, the new policy was duly implemented.

A memorable part of the negotiations featured around the inclusion of gay men and women in the policy. The trade union side were of the view that it was important to ensure that they were not discriminated against and should be included specifically in the policy like the other groups that had already been agreed. The employers side said they would discuss it at a senior level and let us know their response.

A few days later, we re-convened and the employers side said they were happy to include gay men and women in the new policy and they also suggested that paedophiles should also be included.

We were astounded. From our side of the table, it was not something that we would have even considered suggesting. Negotiators on both sides of the table including myself had families with young children.

Prior to these negotiations, I had researched equal opportunity policies because back in those days, they were a fairly new thing. I had not come across one single document anywhere that suggested that paedophiles should be included in any agreement.

We were unanimous on our side of the table in saying to the employer that paedophiles should not be regarded as having some kind of similarity to gay men and women and paedophiles should certainly not be included in the agreement in any shape or form.

Just for the record, this was a Conservative led authority before anybody suggests those silly Labour Councils will typically try to do this.
 
Last edited:
I worked for a trade union back in the 80's going into the 90's. I was a full time lay official which means I was elected and my employer, in this instance a local authority, recognised me as the leading trade union official for a large section of it's workforce and I was the point of contact for all negotiations, disciplinary hearings grievances and anything else that the employer wanted to discuss with it's workforce etc.

In the early years of doing this work, it was becoming commonplace for large employers to implement an equal opportunity policy and this was negotiated with us and after an agreement was reached, the new policy was duly implemented.

A memorable part of the negotiations featured around the inclusion of gay men and women in the policy. The trade union side were of the view that it was important to ensure that they were not discriminated against and should be included specifically in the policy like the other groups that had already been agreed. The employers side said they would discuss it at a senior level and let us know their response.

A few days later, we re-convened and the employers side said they were happy to include gay men and women in the new policy and they also suggested that paedophiles should also be included.

We were astounded. From our side of the table, It was not something that we would have even considered suggesting. Negotiators on both sides of the table including myself had families with young children.

Prior to these negotiations, I had researched equal opportunity policies because back in those days, they were a fairly new thing. I had not come across one singe document anywhere that suggested that paedophiles should be included in any agreement.

We were unanimous on our side of the table in saying to the employer that paedophiles should not be regarded as having some kind of similarity to gay men and women and paedophiles should certainly not be included in the agreement in any shape or form.

Just for the record, this was a Conservative led authority before anybody suggests those silly Labour Councils will typically try to do this.
May be they were taking the P or trying to get one step ahead, knocked the idea on the head before it got off the ground.
 

seaweed

LE
Book Reviewer
One wonders if Lord Steel has a conscience.
 
@rgjbloke Many an organisation was infiltrated or nearly conned by campaigning paedos forty years ago, not only but also political and libertarian groups. They were seen as easy tickets to normalising CSE and abuse; PIE was broken up but children are obviously still not safe from trojan nonces and deviants. Nowadays imo there are several emerging 'respectable' predatory deviants that also need watching.
 
Nowadays imo there are several emerging 'respectable' predatory deviants that also need watching.
I mentioned it in another thread a wee while ago, there's does seem to be a number of "campaigners" and such types, a lot of them middle aged men, who are very interested in the sexuality and "gender identity" of very small children (toddlers even). It all seems very odd to me and yet comes with the blessing of the state and the mainstream media these days. When you consider the stuff that's gone on in the past that the truth is only coming out 40 odd years later, well....
 
I mentioned it in another thread a wee while ago, there's does seem to be a number of "campaigners" and such types, a lot of them middle aged men, who are very interested in the sexuality and "gender identity" of very small children (toddlers even). It all seems very odd to me and yet comes with the blessing of the state and the mainstream media these days. When you consider the stuff that's gone on in the past that the truth is only coming out 40 odd years later, well....
Yes you're probably on the right track there with covert nonces and their little helpers.
 
I mentioned it in another thread a wee while ago, there's does seem to be a number of "campaigners" and such types, a lot of them middle aged men, who are very interested in the sexuality and "gender identity" of very small children (toddlers even). It all seems very odd to me and yet comes with the blessing of the state and the mainstream media these days. When you consider the stuff that's gone on in the past that the truth is only coming out 40 odd years later, well....
Very good example as, at the moment, it's beyond the pale to express any doubt about, for example, transgenderism. Man becomes a woman and then becomes a leader in the Brownies. It screams 'high risk' but no one is prepared to act. In fact, female guides and brownies leaders have been forced out of the organisation due to the issue.
 
Very good example as, at the moment, it's beyond the pale to express any doubt about, for example, transgenderism. Man becomes a woman and then becomes a leader in the Brownies. It screams 'high risk' but no one is prepared to act. In fact, female guides and brownies leaders have been forced out of the organisation due to the issue.
Good point, regret I had to use a Wail article but it has appeared in other titles. Assume women who self as males use men's ? But another car crash awaiting to happen, then politicians, activists and BBC won't be seen for dust?

Now girl gymnasts have to share changing rooms with boys who identify as female | Daily Mail Online
 

Similar threads


Latest Threads

Top