Anorack heaven

ugly

LE
Moderator
#1
Spotters delight
I thought one or two of the spotters here would like this!
 
#2
Man, I just mucked myself at that one.

Look in the "experimental 1903" picture, you will see one done up as an SMLE. Interesting.

There's a couple of extremely low serial number AR 15 rifles in there -- I have a Portuguese contract AR 10 with an even lower one though:D
 

ugly

LE
Moderator
#3
There is also one 03 with the spike bayonet that Roosevelt had banned!
 
#4
Barstewards have got an EM2!

...and they have stuck DYMO tape to it as well!!!

Like the collection of Rosses - some MkIIs as well! One of the MkIIIs looks a bit ropey though...!

Love the Ross - mine has won me more tinware than any other rifle I've ever shot!
 

ugly

LE
Moderator
#5
I havent found a round factory or handload that my Mk3 likes yet, I must put some time into that!
Of course we dont know if it is an EM2 or a Rifle No9.
 
#6
stoatman said:
Look in the "experimental 1903" picture, you will see one done up as an SMLE. Interesting.
I don't know if you saw the rifles that turned up on an Enfield forum a while back:

Someone wrote in to say they'd picked up a couple of rifles out of the "u fix 'em" bin at a small gunstore, and they couldn't identify them. The pictures posted were of two Mauser-action SMLEs with one-piece stocks, or Mausers fitted with SMLE parts - quite similar to the experimental 1903 in the Springfield Armory photo.

Most people guessed that they were simply Turkish capture bodge-jobs (Enfausers), which are fairly common. However, someone more knowledgable chimed in and advised the owner to go and take out a $verybig insurance policy: the rifles were super-rare prototypes made up by Savage in response to a WW1 technical request for an SMLE-substitute from the UK government - ie at the same time as the P13/P14s were also ordered into production. They had standard SMLE mags, sights, nosecap, bands and butts, but were built on a 1903? action and a one-piece P14-style stock. The Springfield 1903s are presumably a response to the same contract enquirey.

What a discovery! Rumour has it that the rifles - bought for about $10 each - were snapped up by a private collector for seven-figure sums.... Groan... if only I had that luck when i buy junky old rifles.... LOL
 

ugly

LE
Moderator
#8
Sounds more like the bannerman cock ups the bodge where the dodgy heat treated rejected 03 actions were bought by Bannerman, fettled and chamber reamed out to take a .303. The lot were shipped over to equip the Home Gd but stamped DP on arrival. Thats Skennertons take on it. If these are genuine then its more likely to be on record somewhere, Small arms committee minutes etc, savage order book for example. These wouldnt exist without some proof. A bit like the Greek Jungle Carbines and the so called SMLE Tanker Carbines that are copies in a way of the Australian lightening trials.
Post a link if you can as I would love to see. Remember that even Enfield kept immaculate production records for all its trial and develoment work. It was a Govt factory and god help us if the paperwork was lost!
 
#9
The Savage SMLEs were indeed genuine: backed up by Savage records, which I recall showed up to a dozen prototypes built in slight variations. I'll try and find the link. I believe its all to be included in Skennerton's update of his bible (this year?), along with a few other Enfield things which have come to light recently.
 

ugly

LE
Moderator
#11
Damn more money on books! I'll be picking up a few more next month as well!
 
#12
Only in America where the firearm is King would they have such a superb museum.

Nice.
 

ugly

LE
Moderator
#13
We have the Herb Woodend Building at The Royal Armouries. In memoriam to the last custodian Herb Woodend. A top geezer. Now as for access and if they are ready yet who knows but they exist!
 

Cutaway

LE
Kit Reviewer
#14
Aye Herb was a remarkable bloke, even if he did consider the Enfield Collection his own ! :D
His own speciality was clips & link, and he had some very esoteric stuff at home.

Reference the Springfeld Museum, is it me or are a couple of the photographs mislabelled ?
For example this one:

I'm pretty sure that the Ljungman was neither in service nor produced in Switzerland, though if someone knows better please inform me.
There are a few other misidentifications which I find surprising from such an impressive museum.
 

ugly

LE
Moderator
#15
Not sure about you but all I see are swiss rifles, K31, Stg57 and some other stuff, was the photo mislabelled? If so I'll email the person who went!
Bill Harriman from antiques Roadshow and Shooting Times did a great lecture to the HBSA at the Royal armouries on clips and chargers. very informative!

edited to add I see what you mean, a KIWI mate has one so I'll check withhim next month. It actually looks like a Lungman in a K31 stock, maybe they had it on trial? The .303 was developed from Colonel Rubins bullet if I recall so we would have similar pieces labelled as UK but looking swiss etc.
 

Cutaway

LE
Kit Reviewer
#17
Yeah, I saw that and looked at my bank account.
The result said I wouldn't be buying one any time soon...

Bugger !
 
#18
Cutaway said:
Yeah, I saw that and looked at my bank account.
The result said I wouldn't be buying one any time soon...

Bugger !
I think the Home Secretary had already made that decision for you!
 

Cutaway

LE
Kit Reviewer
#19
I don't tend to pay much attention to his petty rules, what with having written permission from both Queen Victoria and the Pope.

Secion 5 is a wonderous thing.
 

ugly

LE
Moderator
#20
I think that Springfield trialled all sorts of different options which included jonsons mag system on the Garand reciever. This is nothing new, a glance at the "Lee Enfield Story" By I Skennerton shows all sorts of wonderful trials, The Lee-Burton on page 35 is one classic of a commitee trying to have al the so called best ideas on one rifle. Page 45 shows the Muaser Metford trials rifles.
 

Similar threads

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top