Anger at award of Srebrenica Medal for Dutch Military

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by Ratcatcher, Dec 5, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Remember how our dutch allies gave in without firing a shot, and actually helped sort the men and boys for later execution, well for their restraint and organisational skills they are going to get a medal.....

    This even brought down the Dutch government, and seems a somewhat ill-judged move, what do you think?

  2. Not the fault of the troops on the ground. Do you remember the British UNPROFOR troops who had no choice but to stand by and watch as innocent families were murdered by the serbs? Are you suggesting they shouldn't be allowed to wear their medals?

    In situations like this, it is almost always the leaders who should be made accountable.
  3. Something similar. Tell that to the 20 unarmed British soldiers shot down by the local armed cops in Aden in 1967. We, ordered to by the politicos, held a parade for the bastards a few days later. That's anger nearly 40 years later!
  4. spike7451

    spike7451 RIP

    Or the hundreds of British Servicemen killed in Ulster by the Provo's only for Liebour to give Gerry & Martin the keys to the city!
  5. That's politics and politicians. I think we should be paying them more. £100,000 to start with, then let's look at expenses and pensions, which are clearly too low.
  6. ...sorry, back on thread. The Dutch Government was rightly given a hard time for the ridiculous RoE which their troops operated under in Srebrenica. The Dutch Army contingent was following orders from fat politicians in fat armchairs, far far away. I doubt whether many of them felt proud of their Government's attitude.
  7. Good point - it aint the fault of the troops on the ground maybe they deserve medals they may have been extremely angry at not being able to do more, but as a political move is it the right thing to do, also, should Col Kerralmans be getting a medal? Much of the blame has been laid at his feet also?

  8. History re-written? To clarify, the NI peace process started in 1993 when talks were held between the British Government and Sinn Fein. The first IRA ceasefire was announced on 31st August 1994. Elections for an NI Forum were held in 1996 with a 65% turnout.
    Labour were elected to power on 1st May 1997 and (rightly) continued a process already started by the previous Conservative government.
  9. in_the_cheapseats

    in_the_cheapseats LE Moderator

    I don't know how effective Karremans was before Srebrenica but he was useless afterwards.

    I had the dubious pleasure of working for him when he was reintroduced to NATO as the Ch G3 in Heidleberg. Of all the staff I meet and worked with there, there was no-one more incapable of making a decision.

    I know that this is normally a problem in a NATO HQ anyway but when your boss comes arrives, goes to his office and closes the door, refusing to see anyone unless they have booked an appointment beforehand.....? Nightmare.

    As the branch became more and more ineffectual, we gave up trying to engage him and with the tactit agreement of the Ops 2* (a Brit) took to bypassing him completely.
  10. At the end of the day, yes troops on the ground have to obey orders from above but every individual commander has the ability to assess an increasing volatile situation unfolding with massive numbers of humans lives in the balance, and to adapt those orders to suit the situation on the ground. If that was a Company of British troops on the ground they would have done their utmost to prevent armed aggressors doing what they eventually did but we were not in the shoes of those Dutchmen and we will never know the overall situation, rumours abound that they couldn't fire any of their Anti Tank weapons as they had been passed down from tour to tour and were simply unusable, that the Dutch herded the civilians who had taken refuge in their camp, out into the waiting Serbian Bijela Vuke (White Wolf) soldiers who in turn marched them into the surrounding hills and executed them. Any military unit under a blue beret comes under ludicrous Rules of Engagement and political crap. At the end of the day whatever anyone says, a British Infantry Company in the same place would not have let that happen without putting up a fight...


  11. I think it was all totally political and not the fault of the soldiers on the ground. I worked with the Dutch on numerous occasions in Bosnia and found them to be very proud and diligent soldiers. As stated at the bottom of this extract. A "small country with a big heart". At least they were there.

    Below is an extract from:

    The desperate plight of Dutchbat - the beleaguered, demoralised Dutch soldiers who had the responsibility in July 1995 for implementing the safe havens policy. It describes a crazily conceived international figleaf (liberal interventionism on the cheap) with ludicrous terms of engagement, which amounted to the misplaced belief that the mere presence of a UN force was a sufficient deterrent to the Bosnian Serbs. The air support that might have protected the 8,000 massacred in Srebrenica - which Dutchbat called for - never materialised courtesy of a jittery UN. It was an impossible mission, all now agree; many fond illusions in the international community about a new era of peacekeeping died along with the Bosnian Muslims, and it was largely a matter of chance that it happened on the Dutch watch.

    The only possible crime that the Dutch government could be accused of was naivety. They didn't take up the CIA's offer of agents to intercept Bosnian Serb communications and they didn't debrief their Canadian predecessors in Srebrenica, who withdrew, arguing that the policy was unsustainable. But the naivety was evident across the entire Dutch political culture: parliament, the media and the country was swept along by a morally outraged public opinion that Something Must Be Done that allowed no room for a critical examination of what that Something was.

    The Dutch were one of the few nations to offer soldiers for the 32,000-strong force first envisaged under the Owen-Vance peace plan; in the end the number barely scraped 6,000. They found themselves propping up a bankrupt international policy not of their devising: the fate, you could argue, as did one contributor to a website debate yesterday, of a "small country with a big heart".
  12. Couldn't agree more.

    As for RFUK saying British troops stood back whilst innocent were being slaughtered - utter, insulting pish and I say that from first hand experience.
  13. No i don't remember? Give us the time/date and location of this event please RFUK?
  14. RFUK ; think about Gorazde and what the Duke o'Boots lads achieved there - despite sh1tty ROE and being massively outnumbered - then compare and contrast UK v. Dutch performance!
  15. It doesn't take a lot to bring down the Dutch Govenment - it collapases on average once every 2 years!!