Not read the qualification for a Darwin award either..... prick.
From Darwin awards:
Capable of sound judgment.
The nominee must be at least past the legal driving age and free of mental defect (Northcutt considers injury or death caused by mental defect to be tragic, rather than amusing, and routinely disqualifies such entries). After much discussion, there also exists a small category regarding deaths below this age limit. Entry into this category requires that the peers of the candidate be of the opinion that the actions of the person in question were above and beyond the limits of reason in their opinions.
Why? How is that remotely amusing? What were you thinking exactly? That as we're mostly serving / ex-squaddies we'd laugh at that? No. To loose a child is a terrible thing. To trivialise this is phucked up. FAIL!!
I'll tell you what is fucking funny, you lot getting your knickers in a twist over a fairly tame joke. The amount of pisstaking that goes on here concerning paedo child murderers and you get the arse over this?