And introducing the 2009 Paedo range.......

#2
Looks fcuking stupid.

How exactly does it bring glamour AND fun at the same time, the two are mutually exclusive.

She is a baby FFS. She should be in a baby suit crawling about. Not looking fcuking stupid in high heels.

Why exactly do "fashion" repeatedly attempt to sexualise girls. With thongs for 7 year olds and bra with pads for toddlers.
 
#5
The U.S. manufacturer describes them as bringing 'fun, hilarity and glamour'.
Yes, babies dressed as tiny little Vegas hookers - absolutely hilarious.
 
#6
I wonder how long it will be before they bring out baby gimp masks, perhaps with those little red pool balls?
 
#7
So presumably when the next paedo is brought to court he can use the time honoured defence,

"Well your honour, in her high heels thong and padded bra I honestly thought she was sixteen, it was a genuine error."

Worth a try. :clap:
 
#8
Usually I would crack some grotty remark, but this is just so far of the mark I cannot overcome my own sensibillity here. Totally inapropriate, that's what these shoes are.

Mongs; the disabled; ugly people; chavs; jews; muslims; the French; the uneducated; lilliputers; hats; para's; Walts. They're all fair targets because they can -at some level- defend themselves. Small children cannot defend themselves against sexual avances by adults (or teens). So, if you put a small child in a vulnerable position in that respect you deserve to be punched in the throat.
 
#11
Kaye said:
Mongs; the disabled; ugly people; chavs; jews; muslims; the French; the uneducated; lilliputers; hats; para's; Walts. They're all fair targets because they can -at some level- defend themselves. Small children cannot defend themselves against sexual avances by adults (or teens).
There speaks someone who's never had a stickle brick in their eye.
 
#13
dragknuckle said:
Smudge, you have way too much time on your hands mate.
Well I'm actually quite busy, but I can always put work on the backburner when it comes to turning children into sluts.
 
#14
smudge67 said:
dragknuckle said:
Smudge, you have way too much time on your hands mate.
Well I'm actually quite busy, but I can always put work on the backburner when it comes to turning children into sluts.
Or small blokes into drunken messes :wink:
 
#16
Fecking ridiculous, just like the chav family that lived down the road from me who had their infant-twin's ears pierced when they were just a few months old.
 
#17
That's actually quite obscene, although there is no law stating you cannot dress your child up in what ever style you want. Do they produce little jackboots and stormtrooper outfits?
 
#18
Even though I'm a wretch I find that picture more offensive than if she were naked although I expect that semper is by now dissolving in a pool of his own semen.
 
#19
It says it all when even the NAAFI can't bring itself to joke.
 
#20
Re Glamourising/sexualising children..... Have you seen the American little miss glamour pagents? Scary...... and wrong.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top