GDav said:
Straight away, and picking up on one thing only, I doubt this report.
It states that "The official version is that the buildings collapsed because their steel columns were melted by the heat from the fuel fires of the two crashed planes. "
This isn't true. The official version is that the twin towers collapsed because the hangars which supported the floors were weakened by the impact and subsequent fire. When one floor fell onto the weakened one below it too gave way and a domino effect followed with three or four floors slamming into the undamaged floors below. The weight of the collapse was more than the buildings were designed to take and each collapsed like a pack of cards as a result.
Slo-mo footage of the collapse of each tower confirms this.
Cheers GDav. I'd have to say I find that a bit confusing.
a. Because the 'domino' or pancake effect has been officially discounted by the US.
b. The discounting happened after some bright spark pointed out that the top bits reached the bottom at or close to the speed of gravity, making the pancake effect impossible. The laws of physics tell us there would have been a marked slowing as it collapsed. To fit with the pancake theory and collapse at a uniform (which it did) or accelerated rate would have been impossible.