Americans were detained and abused by ... whom?

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by KGB_resident, May 24, 2005.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-briefs20.4may20,1,5578822.story?coll=la-headlines-world&ctrack=2&cset=true

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4576767.stm

    It seems to me that Guantanamo plays role of GULAG for American secret services where anybody could be sent without trial.
     
  2. Only without the millions of people, hard labour, inadequate rations and summary executions, eh tovarich?

    Leave your moral relativism at U75 please.
     
  3. I thought you said in an earlier post that the chaps who went to the Gulag were not ill treated - KGB.

    Oh and Stoat, KGB has a very different outlook to us. Assuming he is a Russkie, one would expect this and indeed benefit from an opposing, and to us, novel point of view.
     
  4. Dont give the spams an idea .Though micheal moore could do with a couple of years on the gulag diet :)
     
  5. Yes, mushroom, but he often comes across as an apologist for vast soviet crimes by comparing them to minor misdemeanors on the part of the West.

    He should best remember that the non-death camp part of the Nazi concentration camp system is remarkably similar to the GULAG camps - as people who were imprisoned in both can testify. Some of the deportations done by the Soviets were worse - people were dumped in the tundra with no tools & told to fend for themselves. When they did manage to survive and were re-discovered years later, they were deported again.
     
  6. He'd probably deny that more people died at Buchenwald after the Soviets took over than when the Nazis were in charge. It was kept open as a Soviet run camp until the 1950s
     
  7. Dear Stoatman!

    So in your eyes GULAG used by Stalin (died in 1953) for political opressions is sufficient cause, sufficient excuse to create its copy now.

    Btw, I'm sure that Saddam with all his 'rape and torture chambers' (if he would not be a fool) now would be regarded as a beacon of democracy (like his Pakistani copy Musharraf).

    Main mistake of Saddam: he didn't lick American heels.

    PS. What is U75? I suspect that it is place owercowded by dullards. By contrast there are so many real men, that have interesting views and use solted words. I like it.
     
  8. I am not an apologist for the soviet communists (given my background one would not expect me to be). KGB was brought up in a different system, one in which the truth was something that the local commissar spouted. We have been brought up in a system where we only half believe whatever our equivalent of the commissar tells us (church! BBC!). If we think KGB is spouting crap we are all big enough boys to argue the case with him without getting personal.
     
  9. No, Sergei, that's a total non-sequitur. I think you've made a little linguistic misinterpretation. I was criticising you for even drawing any parallel between Guantanamo and GULAG, which is tantamount to a denial of Soviet crimes.
     
  10. Why don't you fly out there check for yourself? Otherwise, you're coming across as another misinformed misanthrope.

    I don't claim the moral high ground with regards to Gitmo. The only reason they're there in the first place is that Castro owns the perimeter, and he doesn't like visitors. Especially ones who like to stir up trouble. The Cubans are the perfect perimeter security for GWOT detainees.
     
  11. Who wants to play kick KGB in the face?
    Sorry had to say something he irritates me somewhat! :D
    twonK!
     
  12. Excellent argument! I accept it. Really scale of violations of human right in GULAG was so huge that Guantanamo is rather summer camp for scouts (moreover there are many scouts in Gitmo).

    I understand that it is a hard think to accept argument from opposite side so I make it for you: GULAG, 911 atrocity, war on terrorism are not sufficient ground to violate human rights.

    Don't you see an obvious contradiction between words and real actions (in Orwellian style)? In name of promoting of democracy world-wide human rights of concrete persons are violating. In this twisted logic there are two sorts of dictators: 'bad' and 'good' ones.

    Now we see very dangerous development. I mean usage of 'good' dictators and their henchmen to detain and torture not foreigners but namely Americans.
     
  13. All the half witted, half brain moron attempts to do, is paint the rest of the free world as bad, and the Soviet Union as good. Sure there Komrade we Americans, Brits, etc make mistakes and don't do things properly. However, they are just that: Mistakes.

    Stalin is the worlds number one mass murderer. Period, end of story. That is quite some proud, remarkable acheivement. Something I want to tell my grandkids about...Wake up pal.

    The Soviet Union sucked. Communism sucks. Its part and parcel for the collapse of the Soviet Union and the lawlessness which reigns there now.

    About the ONLY good the Soviet Union gave the world is: Russian Imperial Stout.
     
  14. Good answer. As you say it was a mistake. Couldn't agree more. I expect that behavior of Pakistani hangmen would be accused by American administration because interests of American citizens are on the first place. No doubt that all involved will be punished. Moreover, these two Americans have right for compensation for unlawul detention and abuses.

    Stalin, GULAG... It is a history now like slavery in USA. It would be really a crazy idea to mention slavery in this context.
     
  15. Slavery in the USA, serfdom in the Tsars empire. Neither of them very pleasant, both of them very much of their time and both abolished less than 150 years ago.

    One cannot equate slavery or serfdom with Stalin and Beria. The first were just the way it was, Stalin was a jolly nasty chap.