American pullout leaves Iceland defenceless

#1
From the Telegraph, link here.

Countries without armed forces, link here.

Perhaps the Danes could assist in training?
 
#2
Perhaps His Tonyness could invade a country that won't fight back then - think of the income from fishing and tourism. Time to make good and take revenge for the cod wars :twisted:

by the way, Iceland is incredibly interesting geologically - shame about the rest of the country :D
 
#3
crabby said:
Perhaps His Tonyness could invade a country that won't fight back then - think of the income from fishing and tourism. Time to make good and take revenge for the cod wars :twisted:

by the way, Iceland is incredibly interesting geologically - shame about the rest of the country :D
Quick off the mark today Crabby!

I had a nice time when I visted, it was just very expensive.
 
#6
My Ancestors (vikings) used to pillage Iceland. Tell me when you guys start, and I'll be on my way with my runed battle-axe!
 
#7
Not_Whistlin_Dixie said:
crabby said:
Perhaps His Tonyness could invade a country that won't fight back then ...
He should invade without delay. The so-called peaceful Icelanders have got a whole fleet of these babies stashed away to renew an old tradition of plundering the English countryside: http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/helge.gif
Two or three or those would easily outgun the Royal Navy as it stands at the moment...

sm.
 
#8
Countries without armed forces
I'm suprised UK isn't on the list. We are a 'Militia' now aint we?




The only time Iceland has been invaded in modern history was by British forces, in May 1940.
Good drills! :)


It's a bit of a dull place though isn't it. Passed through there several times en route to BATUS and it looked like the results of nookleur testing, people included. Their export being Bjork, they deserve to be invaded by a bunch of **** raping Baboons.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top