Just give up. You have no idea what you’re talking about and coming across as an imbecile.You implied and my own sense is the MERT, would NOT respond to every wounded individual from the other side, unless requested and that request is only made, where the man on the ground believes he is salvageable. One assumes, many very badly wounded enemy were too far gone to bother, so the common sop on the ground, really was to take weapon, any intel and then walk on. It might be lawful, but immoral if your playing the game of righteousness.
Why am I still picking at the scab ? I just feel that if this was a morality play. The antagonist is presented as a murderer on this thread by some, which I find deeply offensive. All down to five minutes grainy video people are willing to judge and they're simply failed to convince me he is an evil cnut, beyond that video....
On your understanding of 'The fella in charge was simply not a full shilling':-
If you haven't heard the expression, 'not a full shilling': it means someone not fully in charge of themselves. A person who uses intellect, can objectively see what will happen, if they're follow a certain course of action and as such, NOT carry out an action, which will see them charged with murder.
Sgt blackman knew the rules and in his final comments sounds almost drunk, which is for anyone not paying attention a strong indicator that he and his men were away with the fairies (another colloquism).