ACF Non-Commissioned Instructors

Discussion in 'OTC and ACF' started by Pitster, Jan 13, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Having read about TA A List and B List Commissions in here recently I thought I'd mentioned something I heard in passing, to see if anyone else has heard it, and can shed more light:

    The ACF might be considering putting non-commissioned adults on some form of TA 'B' list in the same manner as its Officers. Apparently, every Detachment is supposed to have an Officer in charge, which clearly is not the case any more. Having only NCO AIs (and therefore civilians) running Detachments might be a problem, apparently.

    So, have I got it all wrong (likely) or can anyone add to this?
  2. Fairly routine now. Westbury run a Cadet Force Commisioning Board (CFCB) which will identify those AIs who are suitable for a TA Gp B Commission. Individual Cadet Bns will have their own pre-selection process which may, or may not, be run in conjunction with the Regional Training Centre in that particular Bde area.

    A good thing in my opinion.
  3. Are you saying that SNCO's will be put on same footing as Officers i.e. subject to mil law and have mod 90 endorsed cadets? (although that is being phased out I heard)
  4. Before I left Devon ACF 2 Years ago, they were speaking about the chances of us NCO's coming under TA Regs, so that we could have the authority to sign for weapons and thus be able to do all the stuff officers can. Maybe this has moved forward? But then again maybe its just an idea that bLiar has come up with to show the Media how full the Army is?
  5. I was signing weapons in and out, when I was an NCO its not just a thing officers do, is that a normal thing in Devon? At one camp I had CTT guys asking me, as a duty WO, when it would be convinent for me to let them put weapons back into the arm`s cote and they were genuine not sarcastic .
  6. The way it was explained to me is this:

    It is called "embodiment", and the basic difference between officers and PI/SI/SSI/SMI is that Officers have the TA B Commission and are therefore part of the Army, and in theory elegible for call-up.

    It stems from the argument that certain people (tax-dodging students like myself) could be using it as a part-time job, but it is not considered as such.

    If im wrong, please correct, as im not sure on this, as i was thinking of applying for AUO but am concerned by these aspects of it.
  7. if we do come under TA regs and being subject to Military laws , that would mean we would be liable for call up unless specific regulations are put in to prevent that.
  8. Question time? If you were ex reg, would you then still come under military law in the Cadets?
  9. Probs not, as you would have left the army, and then re-signed on as an ACF instructor.

    My point was, as someone said, that unless controls were put in place, you could be called up as a civilian effectively if you were embodied.
  10. ACF officers are not subjected to call up. If this strange thread does become true, why on earth would the AI's be subjected to a call up.

    It would be a pretty bad state of affairs if ACF people were needed to help out, lol.

    I can understand the bit about the right sort of person (not necessary an officer) in charge of detachments. It's quite a role to do it well and successfully. The rewards are little, other that you know you 'made a difference'.
  11. Cheers for that, thats just the way it was explained to me, I wasn't really sure either way.
  12. They wouldn't be subject to call up at all but it is definitely the case that more effort is being put into recruiting ACF Offrs from ACF AIs/NCOs. Land Directive LAND/RF 2461 dated 1 Dec 05 refers.
  13. i had considered becoming an Officer , need to weigh up pro and cons and putting the training time in.

  14. Most officers come from the AI pool, where else would they come from!!!!

    Very few have come straight in as officers, and in my experience turn out to be the worst. The ones who were AI's for a few years then becoming Officers are the right sort. First off you can see what they are like, how motivated they are etc. It also has the advantage that they will understand the ACF better...
  15. Very true, after all the ACF is much trumpeted as a youth organisation in green. Its not about teaching kids to bayonet anything that moves.

    So many AI's have come and gone, as they're still got their army head on - it takes them a long time to calm down and realise they're teaching kids, not soldiers.