Darth_Doctrinus said:
According to Al Ghurabaa, the events of the 7th of July can be easily explained.
Click
here - bring a healthy dose of credulousness as well.
I was getting on kinda ok to start with, saw a comment about the human rights abuses against Muslims in Iraq and liked the fact they fail to mention it's generally BY muslims against muslims - but why let the truth get in the way? Then I saw this;
An astonishing recent example is of a young Muslim who had a replica gun at home. Just because he also had an
address and photograph of a British man in the army and some Al-Qaeda DVDâs he was suddenly guilty under the
terrorism act
What fcuking planet are these people on? Until now it had been someone who felt their way of life was threatened, had seen the darkside of comments by western powers and was unhappy with the events in Iraq and Afghanistan...
Then there are the more infamous examples like that of Barbar Ahmed, currently ear- marked for extradition to the
United States, who when arrested had his head pushed to the ground and told âwhere is your God now?â or words
to that effect.
Is there proof for this? AND why is he going to be extradited? Perhaps they should think about this...
"The threat is more likely to come from those people associated with an extreme form of Islam, or who are falsely
hiding behind Islam" she said, and "It means that some of our counter-terrorism powers will be disproportionately
experienced by the Muslims community" she added, and "I think that this is the reality and I think we should
recognise that"
The truth... you're more likely to be a nasty person if you're islamic and wander around with signs saying "death to infidels" as much as if you're from Ireland and believe in bombing the mainland or you stand outside Huntingdon Science Park making death threats to scientists - you're more of a threat - live with it
In this new climate of fear and distrust the British government introduced a new oath of allegiance for foreign
nationals wanting nationalism in the UK and also introduced a ne w pledge to uphold and support the tenets and
foundations of secularism and democracy, so much for freedom and liberalism. Being a Muslim and having your
own allegiance was no longer an option, if you wanted to live here you had to believe what everyone else believed.
There was no room for those propagating change or those who believed that allegiance belonged to God.
Are they suddenly saying that their oath of allegiance to their God is incompatible with an oath to this country? Making people say they won't bomb a country that gives them a life to lead is surely only fair?
Then some more cr*p that say it's all our fault for letting the Americans commit abuses that we far far less than most islam nations....
Then saying that the only reason they attacked on 7/7 was because of our foreign policy - what about Bali bombings? Nairobi? All the other attacks against western interests pre-iraq and pre-afghanistan?
Or am I just giving this drivel and inflammatory sh*te more credence than it's worth?