Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by old_bloke, Apr 21, 2008.
The heart of the site is the forum area, including:
any ex womens ballon corps want to Volunteer for the hot air ballon
(and claiming your ears go pop) does not rule you out for this lucrative role
Somebody who should know a lot better displayed blinding ignorance by saying "Well, UAVs are designed to be expendable and are only there to fill a gap."
Hm. Maybe some of the older or smaller ones, matey, but not something with a 20m wingspan, tipping the scales at 4500Kg, packed with things that you would rather not lose and costing gazillions.
Suppose that buggers the No Claims Bonus
Why the bloody hell do we need so many different types of UAV? The gunners have shit loads of the things (of different types) and now the Crabs have them, but obviously of different types, why not find one that works and then issue it to all services.
Is that too simple a solution?
A single Reaper crashed.
Because it is one of two in AFG the thread title is factually correct whilst terribly misleading.
It's not that misleading, Sven - we've only signed up for three of the things so far, one's not been delivered, and of the two in service, one has crashed...
Where the article is misleading is in the apparent suggestion that Reaper is the only platform in use with 39 Sqn, when it has a number of Predators in use as well.
In answer to your question, Ted, the different UAVs offer different capabilities, ranging from being genuinely expendable to rather too expensive to send off into the ether and to be completely unconcerned if they don't come back. One size wouldn't quite fit all.
It's actually only 33% recurring losses as the third unit hasn't been delivered yet.
More importantly why to the "pilots" of these UAV's wear flying suits?
Thats a very good point, Watchkeeper and Reaper, whats the difference?
IIRC Reaper's got bombs and all kinds of horrible things on it? I think Watchkeeper just watches...
The adoption of REAPER by the RAF is them wanting to get in on the whole UAV thing. The RA UAV boys are using HERMES 450 out in The Stan. It works OK.
Info here: http://search.theregister.co.uk/?q=reaper
You have to view the whole UAV thing as being a bit like the early days of aviation, where no-one really knew the rules and what the machines or the human limitations were.
In some respects UAV's are very similar, they haven't been flying that long and a few early losses are to be expected, especially in a hostile environment, but now they also have the limits of computers and remote communications to consider as well. They are still writing the rulebook and will probably be doing so for another decade so high initial losses are a given.
Its not misleading. Facts have been stated, its for others to make up their own mind on those facts.
On a similar note, Russian Mig splats Georgian UAV.
Faked or something to worry about ?
Separate names with a comma.