Army Rumour Service

Register a free account today to join our community
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site, connect with other members through your own private inbox and will receive smaller adverts!

30M from taxpayers' pockets to the Royals

Come on @Skylog , I'm looking forward to your answer. I'll even give you some help. Somewhere in the following photo is a clue as to why Theresa May might find it especially embarrassing to show up at the G7 meeting next month, and were something to have gone wrong, having to personally explain to another head of government as to why the UK didn't feel it was worth bothering to arrange for adequate official security for the event. We can even leave Her Majesty and immediate family out of your answer, as apparently you have already discounted them. I'm sure there are other examples in other photos, but we'll just stick with the simple ones here.

Or you could just admit that perhaps the people in charge of things in the UK might possibly have some clue of what they are doing while you have none.

_101664541_053e2d0f-a05b-4c6e-bb13-349acf2c705d.jpg
They can afford to pay for the security service so they should the ones who pay instead of the other citizens. Or if they are scared by some terrorist attack they could do a private ceremony.
 
They can afford to pay for the security service so they should the ones who pay instead of the other citizens. Or if they are scared by some terrorist attack they could do a private ceremony.
I think the Security Service is funded centrally, by the government, rather than by the Royals.

You bottom-sniffing cleft.
 
Why should taxpayers pay for it?

Because ultimately it's to their benefit. A minimum of £1.2bn to their benefit.
No wonder socialism in all its forms has always been such a failure, when it's cost-benefit analysis is done by people such as yourself & the maths genius known as the Abbottopotamus.
 
They can afford to pay for the security service so they should the ones who pay instead of the other citizens. Or if they are scared by some terrorist attack they could do a private ceremony.
You're evading it even when the answer is handed to you on a plate. Why don't you simply admit that you don't have the slightest clue of what the real issues are and why the government may need to have direct control of security at events like these?
 
They can afford to pay for the security service so they should the ones who pay instead of the other citizens. Or if they are scared by some terrorist attack they could do a private ceremony.

I've heard one way tickets to Venezuela are going cheap at the moment, someone mentioned it was a Socialist Paradise ?
 
If the new prince is black I will be laughing at all the Arrsers who will be hating the monarchy

Looks at Harry
Looks at Meghan

Considers the use of If viz future children's appearance.

Concludes Skylog is denser than spider


Edit on seeing his subsequent posts viz risk of black king - can we not have the tedious mong hoofed for racism
 
Last edited:

New posts

Top