View Poll Results: Do you believe this country is fighting to uphold freedom, or to control other countries freedoms?
- Voters
- 27. You may not vote on this poll
-
13-12-2008, 17:24 #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 1
Freedom: University of Hull Study
Hi there,
Im currently a student at the University of Hull studying Media, Society and Culutre. One of my modules is on the concept of freedom. For my essay I have decided to study how the Military regulate freedom for soldiers. I was just wondering if i could have some of your thoughts regarding..
* How free you think you are in the army
* What freedom means to you
* Do you feel you've lost some sense of identity because of rigourous training procedures, discipline, uniform and appearance regulations etc...
* How regulated are you in your behaviour off duty, in terms of manners and such.
* Do you feel you have had to reject (or at least subdue) your own culture in order to serve the nation.
*Also do you feel you have being stripped of your freedoms to some degree in order to uphold the rest of the nations overall freedom?
Well, there the main questions, but feel free to add anything else in relation to your freedoms. A copy of my essay, will be available to anyone that would like to look at it. Anyway, thanks for your time.
Shaun Ransom
-
13-12-2008, 17:31 #2
Re: Freedom: University of Hull Study
I would bother to answer if questions
1. were in a sensible sequence and
2. were clearly defined. ..."etc" and "as such" means nothing to meWar is a game that is played with a smile. If you can't smile, grin. If you can't grin, keep out of the way till you can.
-Sir Winston Churchill
-
13-12-2008, 17:40 #3
Re: Freedom: University of Hull Study
Very poor. You seem to think the Army is still stuck in the 1940's.
Originally Posted by HullUni
Pork Eating Crusader
-
13-12-2008, 19:07 #4Senior Member

- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- 14 miles West of the moon, for all I know.
- Posts
- 16,328
- Images
- 7
Re: Freedom: University of Hull Study
Originally Posted by HullUni
We need people who look to the stars, holding the nation and the world in their hearts but at the same time we need down-to-earth people who can do serious and trying work.
In a definite sense, a country's power and prestige isn't only a reflection of its economic power but also a reflection of its people's quality and morality. Moreover, I think the latter is actually more important in the long-term.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/multi...na_has_changed
-
13-12-2008, 20:48 #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 265
Re: Freedom: University of Hull Study
Not as free as a civilian, but only in certain ways. I cannot go on strike, for instance, which is something civvies can do (and rightly so). Our 'sphere' of freedoms is smaller than a normal citizen's, but it is still there.* How free you think you are in the army
Freedom to think and freedom of speech, the ability to do what you like as long as it doesn't harm another human being. The freedom to accept responsibilities and rights.* What freedom means to you
No. Training attempts to teach you a set of behaviours you need to succeed in your role. It does not attempt to change your personality. No matter how clean your bedspace is you are still a slob inside. Some regs are a bit pointless, some are there for good reason (serious facial hair and respirators don't mix well, for instance).* Do you feel you've lost some sense of identity because of rigourous training procedures, discipline, uniform and appearance regulations etc...
Not very much at all.* How regulated are you in your behaviour off duty, in terms of manners and such.
The Army is a culture which you fit into, it does not supplant your own, or attempt to. It does have a strong Christian heritage, but many other cultures and religions have served in it successfully for hundreds of years, so I doubt there are any major problems there. The Army has, if anything, made me more aware of my heritage and my culture (British), and not in the all-white all-Christian all of the time BNP way.* Do you feel you have had to reject (or at least subdue) your own culture in order to serve the nation.
'Stripped' is too strong a word, it's loaded with connotations. My freedoms have been reduced, and I have done this voluntarily. For the sake of cohesion, efficiency, effectiveness and order I have joined an organisation in which my rights have been temporarily reduced or suspended to ensure the organisation functions properly in defending the country. The only reason this is done is because it is vital, and I have done it voluntarily, and more to the point I can leave and regain my full freedom.*Also do you feel you have being stripped of your freedoms to some degree in order to uphold the rest of the nations overall freedom?
Those freedoms are part and parcel of the country, they are an outgrowth of hundreds of years of civilisation and a very valuable contribution to the modern world and our quality of life. Temporarily reducing my own rights to defend other's rights, lives, etc is not something I lose any sleep over. Perhaps this is contradictory in principle? I don't know.
Compare this to our current government, made up of, and elected by, civilians, which is reducing our freedoms and when we ask for them back says "No, it is not safe to be free." because of an overblown terrorist threat. A real tragedy would be to find that, upon leaving the Army, I have no freedoms to come back to, that I have fought to defend a totalitarian state.
-
14-12-2008, 16:05 #6
Re: Freedom: University of Hull Study
Shaun, well done for undertaking primary research on a fascinating subject - needs to be more like you! 3rd/4th year project?
Originally Posted by HullUni
Suggest you'd have helped yourself by giving a pre-amble outlining your project objectives and a position statement on the conception of 'freedom', as the Arrsers here have suggested. Possibly a quote from your literature.
It's a little too broad in its scope (e.g. do you want your subjects to be serving or ex-service; value-laden language e.g. 'stripped'), shoddily presented (use of the word 'anyway'; question marks for questions), and clearly aims of the study need focusing more tightly.
Otherwise well done and yes, would love to see the outcome. All the best,
Boom"As we moved slowly through the outskirts of the town we passed row after row of little grey slum houses running at right angles to the embankment. At the back of one of the houses a young woman was kneeling on the stones, poking a stick up the leaden waste-pipe which ran from the sink inside and which I suppose was blocked. I had time to see everything about her - her sacking apron, her clumsy clogs, her arms reddened by the cold. She looked up as the train passed, and I was almost near enough to catch her eye."
-
14-12-2008, 16:32 #7
Re: Freedom: University of Hull Study
The Democratic Country of Great Britain is no longer a free country. So as far as the army goes, you're probably just as free as what anyone else is.
The country spends billions of pounds doing so-called-fighting to aid other country's to have freedom; yet our own country suffers from a neglect in investment and suppresion from our own government. All of which is done in the name of freedom, saving the planet from global warming and crime reduction. When really all our elected ministers really want to do is dream up further ways of suppressing the electorate so as to be able to spy on us and make further taxes.
-
14-12-2008, 16:46 #8
Re: Freedom: University of Hull Study
So what are the options?
- Uphold our freedom.
- Control others.
There is no contradiction. It is quite possible to try to control others to uhhold own freedoms.
During colonial period Great Britain tried to uphold its freedom to capture as much lands as possible and to control others.
Now the UK itself is simply unable to contol others (only can help our American friends in this business).Jupiter, you are angry, therefore you are wrong.
-
14-12-2008, 17:36 #9
Re: Freedom: University of Hull Study
With regards to the poll; I voted mixed feelings.
Overall we are fighting to uphold our own freedom, however to do this we have to control others. Put it this way, if we weren't stopping the "bad" freedom happening in Afghan with the Taliban and other terrorist groups, they would abuse their freedom in such a way as to make bombs etc to use on us, which in turn begins to ruin our freedom.
I'm sure you get the idea of where i'm going, that's extremely waffley lol.
Sorry.
-
14-12-2008, 17:48 #10
Re: Freedom: University of Hull Study
I don't think the armed forces fight for anyone's freedoms, we fight for Britain's interests. Always have always will.
"See The Little Faggot With The Earring And The Make-Up
Yeah Buddy That's His Own Hair
That Little Faggot Got His Own Jet Airplane
That Little Faggot He's a Millionaire"


6Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote








Bookmarks