Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 44 of 86 FirstFirst ... 34424344454654 ... LastLast
Like Tree65Likes
Discuss Germany to close over the next 15 years. in Strategic Defence & Spending Review 2010 on The Army Rumour Service; Originally Posted by Boris3098 So poor defense; On the cheap. Outstanding. .......................... You been reading my report book?...
  1. #431
    Senior Member Outstanding's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,856
    Quote Originally Posted by Boris3098 View Post
    So poor defense;
    On the cheap.
    Outstanding.
    ..........................

    You been reading my report book?

  2. #432
    Senior Member GLESGA-NED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    454
    Quote Originally Posted by Outstanding View Post
    ..........................

    You been reading my report book?
    Outstanding: Do you actually do any work??

    Anyway I told you so.
    R SIGNALS Ethos: The art of Office Politics is to know:

    1. You are essential until expendable.

    2. The act of smiling prior to assassination is mandatory.

    3. If you are doing your trade then you are not doing your job.

    If you remember these points you will have the ability not to smell shit.

  3. #433
    Senior Member Stonker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    17,927
    Images
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Outstanding View Post
    Ministry of Defence



    Defence Transformation





    The Secretary of State for Defence (The Rt Hon Dr Liam Fox): The Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR), announced last October, marked the start of the process of transforming Defence to meet the challenges of the future. It set out a path to a coherent and affordable Defence capability in 2020 and beyond; and some of the key building blocks – such as the return of the Army from Germany, and a Royal Air Force (RAF) structured around fewer, more capable fast jets.



    This statement provides detail of our intent on future Armed Forces basing and rationalisation of the Defence estate.



    This has been a complex piece of work. It addressed the decision to accelerate the return of the 20,000 personnel still in Germany, plus their dependants, to the UK and the formation of the Army into five Multi-Role Brigades (MRBs). It took into account the footprint of the Armed Forces around the UK and the planned changes to the RAF force structure. A number of other initiatives, such as the future location for Defence technical training and the restructuring of the Army’s non-deployable regional footprint, have also had significant estate implications. Finally, it has also taken account of the need to realise receipts from high value sites Defence no longer required to help address the black hole in the Defence budget left by the previous Government.



    Basing affects a wide range of interested parties across Defence. Experts from across the Department and all three of the Armed Services were consequently involved in the study. Throughout the process the Ministry of Defence (MOD) has been very clear and consistent about the criteria used – above all what is best for the Defence and Security of the UK and what makes overall military sense. We looked at what was best for those serving in our Armed Forces, and their families. We also recognised that Defence decisions have broader regional, economic, and social consequences. Finally, the resulting plan must of course be affordable and offer value for money for the taxpayer.





    The starting point for the review of basing has been the military requirement. Units which are part of larger formations have to be close enough together geographically to be able to work and train effectively and to create the formation coherence necessary for successful combat operations. To do so, they need access to suitable training areas of the right size, and with the right terrain, so they can prepare for deployment.



    We have considered the impact of the proposed changes on Service personnel and their families. Under the Armed Forces’ New Employment Model, the Army aim to base personnel close to a number of units so they can change post without their family needing to move home, and close enough to an urban centre for their families to have access to jobs and education and to the housing market. This will allow greater stability, which is important for the welfare of our Armed Forces and their families, and to continuing the Government’s commitment to rebuilding the Armed Forces’ Covenant.



    The Defence of the United Kingdom, and wider military tasks, including the capacity to support the civil authorities in times of crisis, requires a strong military presence across the entire country. We have also considered the impact of changes on local communities. Finally, we have taken into account the need to make the maximum use of existing Defence estate, and to dispose of that which is not required.



    Much detailed planning remains to be done, both to identify the most effective drawdown plan for the forces currently in Germany and to determine which units are the best match for which sites. We will also need to take into account the potential changes in the balance between the Regular and Reserve forces I have also announced today. And there will be a need for the appropriate level of engagement with local authorities, including the preparation of sustainability assessments and the other work needed to meet our obligations. This means that some uncertainties remain, particularly about the timescales in which the necessary moves will take place. But our strategic objective and the key building blocks of our plan are clear. I will set these out, together with indicative timescales we are currently assuming for planning purposes.



    There is already a concentration of the Army in the south west of England, around Salisbury and around Catterick in Yorkshire. These will make up three of the five MRBs.





    One of the two remaining MRBs to be formed from the units returning from Germany will be based in Scotland. The centre of gravity of the Brigade will be in the central Lowlands. The key sites that are anticipated to be used are Kirknewton, which we propose to develop into a major Army base, and Glencorse. Other MRB units will be moved into Caledonia and, eventually, Arbroath, with the long term plan being to bring the bulk of the Royal Marines together in the south west of England. A site will also be used at Albemarle Barracks, Northumberland. We will aim to move the first unit into Kirknewton in 2016-17, with units probably moving into Glencourse and Caledonia a year earlier. We will plan to move the Royal Marines out of Arbroath around 2015-16, with a unit from Germany moving in shortly thereafter.



    RAF Marham will remain as a base for Tornado GR4 and we have decided that we will build up the Typhoon force at Lossiemouth, retaining that station for the long term as a RAF base, providing the location for the Northern Quick Reaction Alert missions. We will start preparing the infrastructure at Lossiemouth to receive the Typhoon force straight away, and would aim to start to redeploy aircraft there in 2013. We will continue to redeploy aircraft over the following years as space becomes available.



    Although Leuchars will cease to be an RAF base it will remain in military use and will be used to base two major Army units and a formation headquarters. Our hope is to move the headquarters to Leuchars no later than 2014, with the major units thereafter in the period 2015-2017. This will ensure continuity of the military presence in Fife and minimise the impact of the changes on the local economy.



    We are also planning to place Army units in Kinloss in around 2014-15, subject to further detailed planning.



    The MRB centred in Scotland will require a new training area and the MOD is grateful for the positive engagement being taken forward with the Scottish Government to achieve this. We will continue to engage with the Scottish Government to develop firm plans, including the confirmation of a specific site. Overall, this is good news for Scotland with overall force levels increasing.



    The other MRB will be based in the east of England centred on the former RAF base at Cottesmore (in Rutland). The RAF will vacate Cottesmore in 2013, and we anticipate the first unit coming back from Germany should arrive the following year. We also intend to use other former RAF bases and existing Army bases including North Luffenham, in Rutland, where we aim to bring the first unit back in about 2015-16, Bassingbourn, in Cambridgeshire, with the first unit arriving back around 2016-17, and Woodbridge, in Suffolk, where the first unit is unlikely to arrive back before 2017-18.



    Other sites that are anticipated to be used to accommodate Army units returning from Germany are Aldegrove in Northern Ireland, with the aim of a unit arriving in 2015, and Pirbright where we are planning for units from Germany to arrive in 2013.



    Defence must also continue to look to make the most efficient use of the Defence estate and the process will continue to identify and dispose of sites that are no longer needed. Those sites which can be sold, especially high-value sites, will deliver much needed receipts to the Defence budget. We also need to make sure we are making maximum use of those sites which remain. The decision has therefore been taken to vacate and dispose of Craigiehall, Redford and Dreghorn barracks in Edinburgh. We will aim to achieve these disposals by 2014-15 at the latest. We also plan in the same timescale to vacate and dispose of Waterbeach in Cambridgeshire which, subject to the necessary planning consents, will support the Government’s broader aim of increasing the supply of new housing. The units currently based at these sites will, as appropriate, be accommodated at other locations.



    This conclusion also paves the way for a number of other estate-related initiatives to proceed.



    In accordance with Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) direction it is proposed that the Army’s four regional divisional headquarters will be replaced by a single UK support command. The new formation, commanded by a Major General, will be known as Headquarters Support Command and it will be based in Aldershot. Its creation will lead to the disbandment of Headquarters 2nd Division in Edinburgh, Headquarters 4th Division at Aldershot and Headquarters 5th Division at Shrewsbury in 2012. Savings at the Regional Brigade level will be made through structural changes to each of the ten regional brigade Headquarters and to HQ London District, together with their supporting structures rather than closing individual Brigade Headquarters.



    Another of the decisions from the SDSR was to reduce the Army by one deployable Brigade as part of the measure to restructure towards five MRBs, replacing the current mix of armoured, mechanised and light brigades. Having considered the various options, we have concluded that 19 Light Brigade and its constituent units, currently based in Northern Ireland, is the most logical option from a military judgement for disbandment as it is not well suited to become an MRB, nor do the existing basing and training facilities in Northern Ireland cater for heavier equipments and all-arms training. Detailed planning and Trades Union consultation will now commence on the basis of our intent to complete the disbandment by 2013. While this will result in a reduction in the current troop levels in Northern Ireland, with some units being amalgamated within different Brigades and others disbanded, we continue to consider options for future basing in Northern Ireland consistent with our wider re-basing plans. We remain committed to maintaining a permanent military garrison in Northern Ireland. As part of the implementation planning we will now undertake, we will examine what alternative military uses can be made of the sites which are no longer required for 19 Light Brigade.



    Routine business on basing and further work on disposals will continue. Stafford will become home to two additional Signal Regiments in the period 2015 - 2018. This will be done in close consultation with the German authorities, which will continue as the Army now draws up its plans for how to draw down from Germany in a sensible and coherent way.



    RAF Lyneham is the preferred location for future Defence Technical Training. This confirms that the Department will withdraw from Arborfield, in Berkshire and Bordon, in Hampshire, releasing the sites for sale by 2014-15 at the latest. This announcement in no way threatens the existing Defence presence at St Athan. There are no plans to move or reduce the 300 technical training posts as part of the rationalisation to Lyneham. Indeed plans to relocate additional Defence units to St Athan are being developed, and if those plans come to fruition, they will bring a major uplift in employment at that base. We intend to make an announcement before the end of the year.



    As noted above, 160 Brigade will also continue to be in Wales at Brecon.



    Finally, even with the decisions to use the former RAF bases to the greatest extent possible, the demand for civilian workforce at RAF Kinloss, Cottesmore and Lyneham will be reduced. This, combined with the need to match skills to jobs, means that around 545 posts in total will be lost. Consultation has been under way with Trade Unions on the drawdown of RAF Kinloss, Lyneham, Cottesmore and much work has been done to help individuals to assess their future options. Staff have been encouraged to apply for MOD Voluntary Early Release (VERS), and many have taken up that opportunity. However, to manage the drawdown of the Stations efficiently, it is necessary to introduce a redundancy scheme, which will commence with voluntary redundancy terms. Consultation with Trade Unions on the redundancy scheme will take place very shortly.



    The detailed planning work, including the investment required to adapt sites, will now get under way based on this strategic direction. The Ministry of Defence will now begin the process of detailed planning and the appropriate and necessary engagement with the Devolved Administrations and local authorities concerned around the country.



    Further work will be done to draw up individual project plans and determine the timing and sequencing of the Army moves, and this may affect some of the indicative timescales set out here. Once completed, this will deliver the military requirement for basing and estate, which will facilitate our work to maximise the effectiveness of our Armed Forces under the adaptable posture set out in the SDSR. It will rebalance the Defence footprint across the UK, offer stability to our Armed Forces, and deliver better value for money for the taxpayer.
    The dominant, rational part of me says this is simply the end-of-Cold War 'peace dividend' being claimed, about 2 decades after every otehr euro nation did likewise. the balkan entanglement, followed by African adventures [various] helped delay things, as indeed did the madness of Eye-Rack.

    But suddenly the exchequer is feeling the pinch and [note before time] the calamity jane budgeterring in MoD is laid open to scrutiny, while the same kind of buffoons who have fecked up successive generations of procurement initiatives, are busy panick-managing yet another clusterfeck in order to meet Treasury funding limits.

    I am glad i am outside, looking in. Let's hope somebidy starts to get a grip on the way the Army manages its resources from here on in.

    Certainly feel sorry for those who are going through the mill of further drawdown/redundancy/disbandment . . .
    Summer grasses - all that is left of the dreams of soldiers

  4. #434
    Senior Member Outstanding's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,856
    The thing is full of contradictions - match "the Army aim to base personnel close to a number of units so they can change post without their family needing to move home, and close enough to an urban centre for their families to have access to jobs and education and to the housing market" with basings in Leuchars, Arbroath and Kirk-fucking-liston. Jobs - not a hope; education - little choice in einepferdestadts like those; and housing - do they really think people are going to be happy with value growth in places like that? And where do the Jocks/Toms go trapping - or by removing all opportunity for tackling local totty are they hoping that the lads all turn "Greek" to increase the LBGT quota that is doubtless soon to be set by our brethren in Brussels!! And the above goes for the E Midland locations they mention too - but probably they would at least be somewhat better served and less isolated.



    The thing that was so good about Edinburgh - and made many of the non-Jocks like it so much - was the fact it was a city, with real choice of jobs, education and housing. So much for the Mil Covn't - Fatty Fox and Mr Potato Head just don't get it.



    But the worst thing about it is that they are selling off all the family jewels, so that when there is a real need to expand again - and there will be - there will be no capacity in the MOD estate to do so. Cunts!!



    I tell you, - we have had the best of times in the Army. 150,000 strong, enough of a threat from Ivan to keep us interested and on our toes, trips to Ulster to keep us sharp, the ability to deploy an Armd Div (+), and most of Germany as a training area. I'm afraid I wouldn't join now - and the new Service/No2 Dress looks crap!!

  5. #435
    Senior Member Outstanding's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,856
    Quote Originally Posted by GLESGA-NED View Post
    Outstanding: Do you actually do any work??

    Anyway I told you so.
    Yes , no you didn't!

  6. #436
    Senior Member
    seaweed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,752
    Images
    5
    From this I infer that Fox sees no need for the RM to continue Mountain and Arctic Warfare Training, as he knows everywhere our forces will deploy to henceforth will be flat and sunny. The prescience of the Doctor and his orange-coloured boss is worthy of great admiration.
    Dr Johnson: 'Any man thinks less of himself for not having been a soldier, or not having been to sea.'

    Thiomas Babington Macaulay, quoted by Admiral of the Fleet Lord Fisher of Kilverstone: 'Moderation in war is imbecility!'

    Douglas MacArthur: 'There is no substitute for Victory!'

  7. #437
    Senior Member Outstanding's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,856
    Quote Originally Posted by seaweed View Post
    From this I infer that Fox sees no need for the RM to continue Mountain and Arctic Warfare Training, as he knows everywhere our forces will deploy to henceforth will be flat and sunny. The prescience of the Doctor and his orange-coloured boss is worthy of great admiration.
    Sadly his senior military advisor was RM Lt Gen Lamb. Large parts of whose career was spent developing stealth and guile so he has less experience of real, routine soldiering. It is as much the worthiness of his advisors as his ambitions.

  8. #438
    Senior Member Sangreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Up a tree in the Trossachs.
    Posts
    1,896
    Quote Originally Posted by Outstanding View Post
    Sadly his senior military advisor was RM Lt Gen Lamb. Large parts of whose career was spent developing stealth and guile so he has less experience of real, routine soldiering. It is as much the worthiness of his advisors as his ambitions.
    Lamb was Army; a Queen's Own Highlander originally.

  9. #439
    Senior Member bluntslane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,670
    Quote Originally Posted by Boris3098 View Post
    So poor defense;
    On the cheap.
    Outstanding.
    I just read the good Dr Fox's statement above and thought hmmmm, all of that justification aside, has anyone done the wargaming with 5 MRBs as total manpower assets? As a theoretical gambit chuck in a peace support op for the UN in East Africa and stabilisation force op in North Africa. We send a Bde to each but the UN say the first op will take about 18 months to clear and the US say the War on Granting Democracy may take 36 months.

    With a Bde deployed on 2 ops, with 2 Bdes training to relieve them and the 5th Bde doing the sundry opfor, ceremonial etc etc tasks Dr Fox's plan is coping adequately. Until Stormont give him a bell to assist PSNI, Chile supports Argentina in a bid for Falkland oil exploitation and Taleban/AQ reassert influence in Afghanistan when it turns out the new army and police forces revert to protection racketeering and opium production as soon as the west declare victory and withdraw in 2015.

    Interesting times.
    Politically correct doesn't mean morally correct

  10. #440
    Senior Member HueyRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    238
    But it is not just 5 MRBs. It is 5 + 1 (16x) + 1 (3x). If the two other Bdes pick up the contingency task as it kicks off, it would allow the MRBs to take over as it becomes enduring. Or at least that is the theory. How we equip that lot is another buggers muddle but the theory sounds fine! Reality...who knows!
    As to the exact levels of concurrency, well the devil is in the detail!
    "Remember - daddy and mummy's guns are not toys! They are very valuable! If you want to play, you must settle for firing your own, inexpensive weapons!"
    http://www.thosewhofell.co.uk/thosewhofell.gif

Page 44 of 86 FirstFirst ... 34424344454654 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •