
Originally Posted by
Infiltrator
Guru, It's a fair cop!
But seriously, there's knobs in all walks of life, you know it, and I know it. I, for one, am sorry that in general the Army get such a poor impression of FS's. That said, the RAF get an equally poor impression of WO2's. Most are OK, but, and here's the rub, some are have such feelings of, what can only be interpreted as, insecurity that they fall back on the tired old "where's your warrant then?" cliche.
The Army has never, in my experience, been able to look past the rank. I see it every day in the joint environment. Talk to an officer, to another senior or whatever and as soon as they know you are going to talk to them, their eyes are looking for the rank so that they can instantly decide if they have to listen to you or not.
In my last job, we had to deploy frequently, and we had to make our RAF Cpls up to acting Sgt. Why? Only because the Army would not listen to, or take advice from a Cpl. Although the Cpl's that we were sending out were very experienced, had done a minimum of 15 years. The Army seem to think that if you are still a Cpl at that time, you have failed and cannot be very good. Whereas in fact, we see them as on the money. Yes, some are gimps and will always be so, but by the same token, the majority are good blokes.
I am currently working with SSgts who were made up to that rank at 10 & 11 years. Good for them. Actually, they are top notch guys who know their stuff. However, do they have any more experience than an RAF guy that is a Cpl? I'd argue that probably not. The RAF guy is likely to be far more specialised in his role having not been moved around so much in that time.
Again, it's horses for courses. In a field environment I'd be very comfortable being told what to do by an Army Cpl who, after all, knows far more about it than I. So, why do Army Seniors and Officers seem unable to do the same when an RAF Cpl who know's exactly what he's doing gives advice to them on what can and cannot be done in regard to the job he's been sent out to do? This is where the RAF's lack of respect for Army rank stems from.
At my current unit, I look around and I see WO2's doing exactly the job that I would be doing at an RAF unit, whereas the SSgts and the FS's are doing jobs that, frankly, an RAF Cpl could do with his eyes shut. When we work with the Army we get an automatic rank downgrade based on the job that we do. Not the Army's fault, but to get the same level of experience and time served to get it, you need a much higher rank. The RAF then know, that if we were to grade the job properly and actually put in the rank that the job needs, there would be a huge disparity, so we all go back a couple of places.
Don't get me wrong, if the powers that be want me to do a Cpls job, after 27 years in and still pay me as an Army WO2, then it's money for old rope.
The RAF don't want, nor need, WO2. We know that it would simply lead, in the long term, to a dilution of WO posts an mean that promotion is even rarer than it is now.
As for the gimps on this forum stating that they've punched FS's for it or that they've seen them being taken out for some drill by the SSM or whatever......yes, of course they did! If you'll excuse me, I've got to meet a bus load of nurses that are due any moment!
p.s. Exhausting!
Bookmarks