-
22-09-2004, 07:21 #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 2,941
A WO1 once told me, "only ladies wear hats"
Originally Posted by fivetodo
-
24-09-2004, 18:55 #12Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Posts
- 867
And the WO1's opinions are gospel? :D ;)
-
25-09-2004, 07:08 #13
Back in April on a far distant thread......
The army is getting smaller and less people are having to do more. If you are really from an operational unit, and feel you need to large it when you are back at your own Depot, perhaps you need to have a think about how Operational You are??
Originally Posted by subbsonic
No matter how poweful one's armies, in order to enter a country one needs the goodwill of the inhabitants.
LCPL Niccolo Machiavelli
June 1513
-
02-11-2004, 16:39 #14Senior Member

- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 595
I did a parachute jump and on the same plane was a bunch of girls. I doubt they got back to their 6th form and went larging it about.
Originally Posted by Ridgeback
As for the berets, I'd rather flat caps than landing pads
-
02-11-2004, 18:03 #15Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 2,390
Maybe, but I bet they weren't stood up for 40 minutes in an open doorway at night 800ft above some training area after a 5 hour low level flight, wearing 170lbs of equipment and parachutes, travelling at 130 miles an hour, then having jumped alongside 90 other guys from the same aircraft having to tab a fair few km to an RV point. Thats after a six week physical thrashing on pre para and P Coy. I agree on the beret thing though. :D
Originally Posted by come_to_arrest_the_zulus
-
02-11-2004, 18:52 #16Senior Member

- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 595
Re: 216 and 264 Flat Cap Berets
actually they were, they were real hardcore. 1 even spent the flight hammering 6 inch nails in to her kneecaps
point is they jumped out of a plane, and thats wat he said is over coming fear
I'd say the bit with the kit is a physical challange, and with all those other lads there youre not going to want to biff it are you?
-
02-11-2004, 18:58 #17
Re: 216 and 264 Flat Cap Berets
There's a world of difference between military and civilian parachuting. If you've done both, you'd know. For a start there's the time of day, height, kit, puking blokes, aircraft etc. I disagree with ridgeback, that's only one part of it.
Originally Posted by come_to_arrest_the_zulus
As for blokes biffing, seen it, not easy for them either. Off the plane and RTU or whatever.
Getting back to the original point. I'd rather see a 'flat cap' than a 'helipad' any day.
Mouse training for men.
You can take a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. However, you can bl**dy well make it wish it had!
-
02-11-2004, 19:04 #18Senior Member

- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 595
Re: 216 and 264 Flat Cap Berets
yeah yeah I hear you, I just dont think it's the be all and end all, maybe I'll change my opinion if I get the chance to have a crack at it myself
On the beret subject, I think berets look a lot better when the cap badge is not directly over the left eye, but around a little to the side. old skool may not agree, but it looks a lot better than some of the turban or third eye berets you see.
-
02-11-2004, 19:08 #19
Re: 216 and 264 Flat Cap Berets
It's not, but there is something different. Have a crack, but remember where you came from. Few do.
Originally Posted by come_to_arrest_the_zulus
Agreed
Originally Posted by come_to_arrest_the_zulus

Mouse training for men.
You can take a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. However, you can bl**dy well make it wish it had!
-
05-11-2004, 00:07 #20Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 1
Re: 216 and 264 Flat Cap Berets
I have recently finished a tour with 216 Sig Sqn. I must admitt, having served in THE CORPS for many years, it was one of the most enjoyable tours I've had.
The beret (headdress) shaping boils down to one thing,in my eyes, PRIDE!!
Proud to be and AIRBORNE Signaller.
Some do cross the line and enter into the realms of looking ridiculous (French Farmer Stylee). These are individuals and they are quickly brought to line by the older and bolder members. You cannot tar a unit with the same brush, just because of the way some individuals act.
I myself, am not AIRBORNE however, If I was, then I would most certainly shape my headdress in the same manner, don the Smock and be one of many proud PARA Signallers.
At the end of the day, it makes you stand out and be noticed (not a bad recriutment point).
CAYTHORPE ROCKS!!!!
__________________________________________________ ________
Work is for people who cannot FLY FISH!! Tight lines


73Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote







Bookmarks