Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Like Tree5Likes
Discuss USN - LCS, one for each theatre... in Royal Navy on The Army Rumour Service; http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/on...#idc-container Seems like the plan, since the USN can't make up its mind over the two LCS designs, is that they'll use one hull in the middle east in the tighter waters (USS Freedom, the ...
  1. #1
    Senior Member Yeoman_dai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Here and there... you know
    Posts
    1,712

    USN - LCS, one for each theatre...

    http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/on...#idc-container

    Seems like the plan, since the USN can't make up its mind over the two LCS designs, is that they'll use one hull in the middle east in the tighter waters (USS Freedom, the conventional one) and use the bigger USS Independence trimeran in the Pacific where range counts.


    Regardless, they still haven't worked out anything more than a 57mm gun and a couple of .50cal and you have to think, how much use can they really be with just those.... I guess two helo spots and 40kt top speed makes them useful of anti-piracy.
    RAC(TA) - 2006-2009
    Royal Navy - 2009 +

    Sir Walter Raleigh declared in the early 17th century that "whoever commands the sea, commands the trade; whosoever commands the trade of the world commands the riches of the world, and consequently the world itself." This principle is as true today as when uttered, and its effect will continue as long as ships traverse the seas."

  2. #2
    Senior Member sunnoficarus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Sailing to Byzantium
    Posts
    12,480
    Even the US grown ups now admit the Little Crappy Ship won't last five minutes in a shooting war. The poor sods who have to serve on them are starting to refer to them as suicide boats.
    Everyone agrees they are a fatally flawed concept forced on the Navy by a Sec Def with a 'vision' and convinced that speed was a great thing but seemingly oblivious to the fact you just send off your 160kt helicopter to chase fast things rather than design a 4,000 ton Haze Grey go fast.
    Problem is, so much political capital has been sunk into LCS tbere is no going back now.


    http://www.aviationweek.com/Article...._p0-456228.xml
    Last edited by sunnoficarus; 25-05-2012 at 10:15.
    Warning, this post contains some flash photography.

  3. 29-05-2012, 21:25

    Senior Member


  4. #3
    Senior Member Yeoman_dai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Here and there... you know
    Posts
    1,712
    It needs missile systems. Decent ones - the US Army really screwed the USN over by cancelling NLOS. Granted, understandable why if the things just, weren't, working... But frustrating for the USN all the same
    RAC(TA) - 2006-2009
    Royal Navy - 2009 +

    Sir Walter Raleigh declared in the early 17th century that "whoever commands the sea, commands the trade; whosoever commands the trade of the world commands the riches of the world, and consequently the world itself." This principle is as true today as when uttered, and its effect will continue as long as ships traverse the seas."

  5. #4
    Senior Member sunnoficarus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Sailing to Byzantium
    Posts
    12,480
    Quote Originally Posted by Yeoman_dai View Post
    It needs missile systems. Decent ones - the US Army really screwed the USN over by cancelling NLOS. Granted, understandable why if the things just, weren't, working... But frustrating for the USN all the same
    Apparently the new cunning plan is to improve their cruising speed on diesels and use them as primarily ASW platforms. Some talk of the Yanks buying Sonar 2087 to go on them.
    Last edited by sunnoficarus; 10-06-2012 at 22:57.
    Warning, this post contains some flash photography.

  6. #5
    Senior Member brighton hippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    7,345
    But but they are the most awesome warships ever made and all the other navys are jealous because they are stuck with frigates
    On a Hot morning in cyprus I found the meaning of anger. Fortunataly I was comftably numb.
    The RSM and various other NCO's seemed very agitated.
    maybe they should look into counselling?

  7. #6
    Senior Member jimmys_best_mate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    11,665
    Quote Originally Posted by sunnoficarus View Post
    Apparently the new cunning plan is to improve their cruising speed on diesels and use them as primarily ASW platforms. Some talk of the Yanks buying Sonar 2087 to go on them.
    I may be wrong, but doesn't that mean they've spent a lot of money to develop a really underarmed frigate?

  8. #7
    Senior Member sunnoficarus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Sailing to Byzantium
    Posts
    12,480
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmys_best_mate View Post
    I may be wrong, but doesn't that mean they've spent a lot of money to develop a really underarmed frigate?
    Indeed.
    Warning, this post contains some flash photography.

  9. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    14
    The are barely leading the field when it comes to navel ships, sure there ships are fast and scary looking but we have the balls and the weaponry. Not only that we have a better sense of technology

    Plus brains in our heads

  10. #9
    Senior Member History_Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Wiltshire
    Posts
    2,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie-whiskey View Post
    The are barely leading the field when it comes to navel ships, sure there ships are fast and scary looking but we have the balls and the weaponry. Not only that we have a better sense of technology

    Plus brains in our heads
    WTF are you banging on about?
    rockpile and redshift like this.

  11. #10
    Senior Member toryboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Windsor
    Posts
    295
    Its nice to see that its not only UK defence procurement that's FUBAR. The only thing these ships are good for is anti-piracy and drug smuggling interdiction, but the outrageous cost means that the US politicians need to think of a somewhat more glamorous role to avoid pissing off the taxpayers too much.
    Grace, space, pace.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •