- 23-05-2012, 22:15 #1
USN - LCS, one for each theatre...
http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/on...#idc-container
Seems like the plan, since the USN can't make up its mind over the two LCS designs, is that they'll use one hull in the middle east in the tighter waters (USS Freedom, the conventional one) and use the bigger USS Independence trimeran in the Pacific where range counts.
Regardless, they still haven't worked out anything more than a 57mm gun and a couple of .50cal and you have to think, how much use can they really be with just those.... I guess two helo spots and 40kt top speed makes them useful of anti-piracy.RAC(TA) - 2006-2009
Royal Navy - 2009 +
Sir Walter Raleigh declared in the early 17th century that "whoever commands the sea, commands the trade; whosoever commands the trade of the world commands the riches of the world, and consequently the world itself." This principle is as true today as when uttered, and its effect will continue as long as ships traverse the seas."
- 25-05-2012, 10:01 #2
Even the US grown ups now admit the Little Crappy Ship won't last five minutes in a shooting war. The poor sods who have to serve on them are starting to refer to them as suicide boats.
Everyone agrees they are a fatally flawed concept forced on the Navy by a Sec Def with a 'vision' and convinced that speed was a great thing but seemingly oblivious to the fact you just send off your 160kt helicopter to chase fast things rather than design a 4,000 ton Haze Grey go fast.
Problem is, so much political capital has been sunk into LCS tbere is no going back now.
http://www.aviationweek.com/Article...._p0-456228.xmlLast edited by sunnoficarus; 25-05-2012 at 10:15.
Warning, this post contains some flash photography.
-
Senior Member
- 10-06-2012, 21:37 #3
It needs missile systems. Decent ones - the US Army really screwed the USN over by cancelling NLOS. Granted, understandable why if the things just, weren't, working... But frustrating for the USN all the same
RAC(TA) - 2006-2009
Royal Navy - 2009 +
Sir Walter Raleigh declared in the early 17th century that "whoever commands the sea, commands the trade; whosoever commands the trade of the world commands the riches of the world, and consequently the world itself." This principle is as true today as when uttered, and its effect will continue as long as ships traverse the seas."
- 10-06-2012, 22:55 #4
Last edited by sunnoficarus; 10-06-2012 at 22:57.
Warning, this post contains some flash photography.
- 10-06-2012, 22:57 #5
But but they are the most awesome warships ever made and all the other navys are jealous because they are stuck with frigates
On a Hot morning in cyprus I found the meaning of anger. Fortunataly I was comftably numb.
The RSM and various other NCO's seemed very agitated.
maybe they should look into counselling?
- 10-06-2012, 22:58 #6
- 10-06-2012, 23:02 #7
- 13-06-2012, 21:22 #8Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 14
The are barely leading the field when it comes to navel ships, sure there ships are fast and scary looking but we have the balls and the weaponry. Not only that we have a better sense of technology
Plus brains in our heads
- 13-06-2012, 21:24 #9
- 13-06-2012, 21:46 #10
Its nice to see that its not only UK defence procurement that's FUBAR. The only thing these ships are good for is anti-piracy and drug smuggling interdiction, but the outrageous cost means that the US politicians need to think of a somewhat more glamorous role to avoid pissing off the taxpayers too much.
Grace, space, pace.




5Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote








Bookmarks