Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Like Tree657Likes
Discuss CVF and Carrier Strike thread in Royal Navy on The Army Rumour Service; And what about future combat UAVs, which are going to be huge fuck-off supersonic things rather than converted sport gliders? They're going to need CATOBAR, and thanks to all the spackers like you with a ...
  1. #1351
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NRW
    Posts
    613
    And what about future combat UAVs, which are going to be huge fuck-off supersonic things rather than converted sport gliders? They're going to need CATOBAR, and thanks to all the spackers like you with a hard-on for STOVL we're not going to be able to use them.
    thinkblue likes this.
    Choose your future. Choose life.
    I chose not to choose life. I chose something else.

    Manui Dat Cognitio Vires

  2. #1352
    Oxygen Thief
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,226
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperSLime View Post
    And what about future combat UAVs, which are going to be huge fuck-off supersonic things rather than converted sport gliders? They're going to need CATOBAR, and thanks to all the spackers like you with a hard-on for STOVL we're not going to be able to use them.

    Since the UK created the Harrier back in the 60's, it is not beyond the wit of our engineers to create a UAV equivalent. And since creating a decent STOVL aircraft is all about weight reduction, getting rid of the pilot and all his instrumentation, canopy and environmental needs is a jolly good idea. Thats a tonne saved, at the very least.

    As to your fascination with mach-2, I wonder why we need it. Very few of these supersonic fighters can super-cruise, so the mach-2 label is only a dash capability. Is all that extra weight, complexity and fuel burn really worth the while?

    So there you have a simple but effective STOVL UAV that could be up and running in a few years - and jumping from a carrier with no cat and no trap. (And no, it does not have to look like a Harrier, but all the under-skin technology and experience is already there and waiting.)


    .

  3. #1353
    Senior Member Grumblegrunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    8,996
    as we have a load of sea harriers kicking about which might or might not be flyable we could reuse those nice engines to make said jumping ucav.

    I see BAE do armed naval boat drones so maybe they could use a few of those to protect the fleet as we have no ships left. something with a phalanx on might be usefull against all sorts of uppity wog type craft.
    what the world needs is an enema, make that two - just to give it a sense of purpose.

    US electoral democracy is just a structured system of legalised bribery.

    a senior Chinese officer has said, “all the great nations in the world own aircraft carriers – they are symbols of a great nation”. That’s why China has just commissioned its first. By the same token, to opt for a “carrier gap” of some years is to abandon your responsibilities.

  4. #1354
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,541
    Images
    1
    I've seen quite a few glider winches and the winch is always well over 150m away, where do you propose the winch is fitted, on another ship?

  5. #1355
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NRW
    Posts
    613
    Quote Originally Posted by tekirdag View Post
    As to your fascination with mach-2, I wonder why we need it.
    Because if we don't have it, any enemy with Su27s - or even MiG21s - will be able to evade our useless STOVL UCAVs by simply accelerating.

    Quote Originally Posted by tekirdag View Post
    Very few of these supersonic fighters can super-cruise.
    The UK's first supercruise-capable aircraft entered service in 1959, long before the Harrier.

    Quote Originally Posted by tekirdag View Post
    a simple but effective STOVL UAV that could be up and running in a few years
    And that we'd have to develop all by ourselves - something that, in the field of UAVs, we have so far miserably failed at doing.

    The Harrier is obsolete. Get that into your thick head.
    Choose your future. Choose life.
    I chose not to choose life. I chose something else.

    Manui Dat Cognitio Vires

  6. #1356
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NRW
    Posts
    613
    Quote Originally Posted by frenchie View Post
    I've seen quite a few glider winches and the winch is always well over 150m away, where do you propose the winch is fitted, on another ship?
    Perhaps the glider could be carried on one MTB and the winch on another. That would fit in quite well with teki's obsessions.
    Choose your future. Choose life.
    I chose not to choose life. I chose something else.

    Manui Dat Cognitio Vires

  7. #1357
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,541
    Images
    1
    I do remember reading that the sea state in the South Atlantic would have meant that catapult launches would not necessarily have been possible, where as STOVL was. Do USN CV's operate unhindered in heavy sea states?

  8. #1358
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,541
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperSLime View Post
    Perhaps the glider could be carried on one MTB and the winch on another. That would fit in quite well with teki's obsessions.
    Leave the glider in the UK and feed the winch out until you need it, seems sensible to me.
    180WPRE likes this.

  9. #1359
    Senior Member Grumblegrunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    8,996
    they used to shoot seaplanes off battleships and recover with a crane, that might work using 'proven' tech cant we use a huge net for retrieval.

    seeing as we caused most of the troubles we could sign a defense pact with the israelis and get some decent tech out of it along with US aid and a bigger budget. the arabs arent talking to us anymore anyway.
    what the world needs is an enema, make that two - just to give it a sense of purpose.

    US electoral democracy is just a structured system of legalised bribery.

    a senior Chinese officer has said, “all the great nations in the world own aircraft carriers – they are symbols of a great nation”. That’s why China has just commissioned its first. By the same token, to opt for a “carrier gap” of some years is to abandon your responsibilities.

  10. #1360
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NRW
    Posts
    613
    Quote Originally Posted by frenchie View Post
    I do remember reading that the sea state in the South Atlantic would have meant that catapult launches would not necessarily have been possible, where as STOVL was. Do USN CV's operate unhindered in heavy sea states?
    The bigger the ship, the heavier the sea state it can operate aircraft in. In the South Atlantic the Invincible had serious problems with the weather, and often couldn't fly off aircraft while Hermes (a converted CATOBAR ship) could. Of the 20 Sea Harriers sent with the Task Force four were lost in accidents, including one that fell off Invincible's deck in bad weather.

    STOVL is a good way to keep a fixed wing capability when you only have small decks available, but if you have a 65,000 ton carrier to play with it's a stupid, short-sighted and inferior system.
    Choose your future. Choose life.
    I chose not to choose life. I chose something else.

    Manui Dat Cognitio Vires

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •