Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 8 of 15 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Like Tree56Likes
Discuss UK Frigate Carried Only Four AA Missiles to Libya in Royal Navy on The Army Rumour Service; I wonder how many staffers does it take to work out a plan as to how many missiles a VLS system should when they don't plan to use the system?...
  1. #71
    Senior Member omegahunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    862
    I wonder how many staffers does it take to work out a plan as to how many missiles a VLS system should when they don't plan to use the system?

  2. #72
    Senior Member Dafty duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    South of the Clyde
    Posts
    250
    I get the gist of what the matelots on here are saying but surely if the ship has the capability to carry the things should it not be carrying them just in case?

    It's better to be out on the town with a condom in your pocket and not need it than not have it, need it and end up catching the clap off some dirty skank.
    Chances of promotion are inversely related to how hard you work.

  3. #73
    Senior Member California_Tanker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,495
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by A2_Matelot View Post

    The Septics do a very similar thing even 5th Fleet assets steaming out of Bahrain - they carry what they think they need for a region/tasking as directed by a theatre entry plan, to the theatre entry standard.

    Lets just leave it at that.
    Though this is true, there is some inherent flexibility in the ships. A Mk41 cell can carry anything from VLASROC through twin ESSMs. There is precedent of one Tico being loaded with every single one of the 122 VL cells holding a Tomahawk. Is my knowledge off, or can the Type 23's Seawolf cells only carry Seawolf missiles? If so, then where's the advantage to not carrying them?

    It is true - the powers that be knew this and decided AA engagements were unlikely
    Is that not more or less the same as the Israeli assesment of the Hezbullah threat shortly before INS Hanit took an anti-ship missile to the helo hangar?

    NTM
    The difference between Infantrymen and Cavalrymen is the Cavalrymen get to die faster, for we ride into battle!

  4. #74
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A padded cell
    Posts
    4,489
    I imagine that there's no great conspiracy. Wasn't Westminster sent to Libya in a hurry? If so, it may simply have been a case of saving time.

  5. #75
    Senior Member the_guru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    8,105
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Yokel View Post
    I imagine that there's no great conspiracy. Wasn't Westminster sent to Libya in a hurry? If so, it may simply have been a case of saving time.
    Hasn't it been stated that it replenned in Gib?
    "Is it a crime to hit a student across the back of the head with a snooker ball in a sock?"

  6. #76
    Senior Member tiny_lewis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    No longer six inches up the arsehole of England
    Posts
    3,476
    And as if British military history isn't littered with similar operational assessments that proven to be either incorrect, or allowed for no Murphy Factor.

    You mentioned the Falklands, A_2... then you ought to remember the fcuk ups that were made there.
    There is no question so obviously stupid that it prevents one supposedly intelligent human from asking it of another.

    Likewise, there is no human problem that cannot be solved by the correct application of the appropriate quantity of high explosive, the suitable quantity being derived by the Formula P, where P = "plenty"

    Nobody ever imagined a bunch of Orcs would steal a database table...

  7. #77
    Senior Member cloudbuster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,613
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by seaweed View Post
    That was the fun of being a go-anywhere, do-anything Navy.
    Edited for tense.
    If you can't take the RAF, you shouldn't have joined a joke.

  8. #78
    Senior Member labrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,474
    Quote Originally Posted by tiny_lewis View Post
    And as if British military history isn't littered with similar operational assessments that proven to be either incorrect, or allowed for no Murphy Factor.

    You mentioned the Falklands, A_2... then you ought to remember the fcuk ups that were made there.
    And as mentioned before, even then we still kept the Nukes with the fleet "just in case" there was an unpredicted escalation of the situation or it kicked off somewhere else in NATO...

  9. #79
    Senior Member Mattb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,591
    Quote Originally Posted by chocolate_frog View Post
    Let's look at the big picture.

    What are the cost implications of the RN parking the boat on a 'uncharted' rock, sinking and losing the lot?
    TBH, if the canoe is worth quarter of a billion as some seem to suggest, then even if the missiles were £1M a pop the cost of losing the lot would be chickenfeed compared to the loss of the ship.
    Roy Durrands dry-bums leprechauns. FACT.

    To be born English is to win first prize in the lottery of life.

    Cecil Rhodes

  10. #80
    Senior Member rickshaw-major's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    6,936
    Quote Originally Posted by California_Tanker View Post
    Though this is true, there is some inherent flexibility in the ships. A Mk41 cell can carry anything from VLASROC through twin ESSMs. There is precedent of one Tico being loaded with every single one of the 122 VL cells holding a Tomahawk. Is my knowledge off, or can the Type 23's Seawolf cells only carry Seawolf missiles? If so, then where's the advantage to not carrying them?



    Is that not more or less the same as the Israeli assesment of the Hezbullah threat shortly before INS Hanit took an anti-ship missile to the helo hangar?

    NTM
    Oh no - now you've upset the Andrew apple cart! I suspect that the launcher only holds Sea Wolfs. So where is the advantage in not carrying them. Or were the empty holes filled full of other stores such as rations?
    I'm the rootin'est, tootin'est........................

Page 8 of 15 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •