Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 11 of 22 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Discuss Discussing the case for disbanding the RAF in Royal Air Force on The Army Rumour Service; Originally Posted by mattyw The RAF need so much money as everything costs so fvcking much. Typhoons cost £60 million each and how much does a jackle cost? The only reason you pick on the ...
  1. #101
    Senior Member Semper_Flexibilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    6,391
    Quote Originally Posted by mattyw View Post
    The RAF need so much money as everything costs so fvcking much. Typhoons cost £60 million each and how much does a jackle cost?
    The only reason you pick on the RAF is that they get lots of money to go towards kit.

    I think the FAA should be mearged into the RAF so should the AAC So the pilots are in one place.

    The ground crew would be the same and the trainning will be the same. The Raf can have difrent sections to difrent jobs like 201 SQD can be navel air and so on.

    Navel air, is that related to Anal air?
    Think of a herd of cats briefly all moving in the same direction due to a random quantum fluctuation...


    "It costs money to have children...if you don't have any....then don't have them. It is THAT simple. " - Mr_Deputy

  2. #102
    Senior Member vampireuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,381
    The crabs are starting to get angry gents.

  3. #103
    Senior Member ASICarrot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    440
    CTD I laughed when I first read that on pprnue but its even more fitting here!


    Crabtastic the sorry state of the FAA in 39-40 was due to the RAF - it was well within budget and native RN demands to upgrade the FAA to a top level during the 1930s (such was the cheapness of aircraft design and construction at the time).

    Force Z would not have sailed had Churchill listened to advice. This is a man who was convinced the Japanese would not attack and was equally convinced that they would give up at a show of force. Force Z was a gamble that backfired NOT a representation of military doctrine or the understanding of airpower at the time.

    Finally force Z had shoddy landbased aircover because the RAF had not sent sufficient assets to the theatre AND had not liased with the army for the placement of airfields which they plonked all over the place in indefensible positions which led to them being of better use to the Japanese than the RAF.

  4. #104
    Senior Member CrashTestDummy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The dark side
    Posts
    6,192
    Quote Originally Posted by vampireuk View Post
    The crabs are starting to get angry gents.
    All you need to do is whisper the two little words, "utterly, utterly" and just watch their little faces turn red and the steam start to come out of their ears.

    Never fails
    "Alright, they're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time."

    "We have reason to believe that man first walked upright to free his hands for masturbation." - Lily Tomlin

  5. #105
    Senior Member pandaplodder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Purgatory
    Posts
    1,016
    Images
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Dunservin View Post
    Ten countries have aircraft carriers. See here.

    Re Dunkirk: 338,226 soldiers were evacuated in the nine-day operation organised by the RN despite overwhelming German air superiority.

    Re Hitler's planned invasion of Britain in 1940: This says it better than I can:

    Why Operation Sealion Wouldn't Work


    Re Argentinean use of Stanley for FJ: Sorry to quote Wiki but it should suffice for the ignorant:

    Escalation of the air war
    see this: Would Hitler really have invaded Britain? - World War 2 Talk for an ongoing discussion on Op Sealion.

    Re: Dunkirk - The RN had to withdraw its destroyers as it couldn't afford to lose them in bombing raids, the lift was completed by (fairly obviously) small boats, although given as a success for morale it was pretty much a disaster for the British Army.

    Fast jets? if memory serves me Learjets were using the airfield before the conflict and I meant the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk not the Dassault-Breguet Super Étendard (the Skyhawk was capable of using the airfield fully bombed up).
    Eagles may soar but Foxes don't get sucked into Jet Engines!!!!!

    Always outnumbered never outgunned

  6. #106
    Senior Member Semper_Flexibilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    6,391
    Quote Originally Posted by pandaplodder View Post

    Re: Dunkirk - The RN had to withdraw its destroyers as it couldn't afford to lose them in bombing raids, the lift was completed by (fairly obviously) small boats, although given as a success for morale it was pretty much a disaster for the British Army..
    RN Losses Operation Dynamo;


    Grafton, sunk by U-62 on 29 May;
    Grenade, sunk by air attack off the east pier at Dunkirk on 29 May;
    Wakeful, sunk by a torpedo from the Schnellboot (E-boat) S-30 on 29 May;
    Basilisk, Havant and Keith, sunk by air attack off the beaches on 1 June.


    The last RN Destroyer to leave Dunkirk was HMS Shakiri that left the mole about two hours before German troops entered Dunkirk.
    Think of a herd of cats briefly all moving in the same direction due to a random quantum fluctuation...


    "It costs money to have children...if you don't have any....then don't have them. It is THAT simple. " - Mr_Deputy

  7. #107
    Senior Member ASICarrot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    440
    Operation Sealion

    Is pretty much the best essay on the subject.

    That thread is largely arse (with people arguing tit for tat on population resistance and morale instead of physical assets) with some gems but it's interesting focus is whether or not Hitler actually intended to invade, not the success of an invasion.

  8. #108
    Senior Member instinct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Edniburgh
    Posts
    1,361
    Quote Originally Posted by pandaplodder View Post
    see this: Would Hitler really have invaded Britain? - World War 2 Talk for an ongoing discussion on Op Sealion.

    Re: Dunkirk - The RN had to withdraw its destroyers as it couldn't afford to lose them in bombing raids, the lift was completed by (fairly obviously) small boats, although given as a success for morale it was pretty much a disaster for the British Army.
    No the destroyers were getting troops off right untill the end. In fact i believe more were taken off by the Mole than the actual beaches. It was a disaster as any retreat would be.
    If Iraq was such a threat to everyones national security why did only take two f**kin weeks to take over the whole country!

  9. #109
    Senior Member
    seaweed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,815
    Images
    5
    The Dunkirk 'little ships' were needed and used to ferry tps from shallow water to the destroyers (destroyers drew more water than a standing Pongo) and their own boats (one small motor cutter and one oared whaler) were too small to be much use when each ship was trying to collect hundreds of men.

    Read all about it, 'Full Cycle' by rear Admiral WS Chalmers.

    Window to HMS Havant in Havant church.
    Dr Johnson: 'Any man thinks less of himself for not having been a soldier, or not having been to sea.'

    Thiomas Babington Macaulay, quoted by Admiral of the Fleet Lord Fisher of Kilverstone: 'Moderation in war is imbecility!'

    Douglas MacArthur: 'There is no substitute for Victory!'

  10. #110
    Senior Member crabtastic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    6,344
    Images
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by ASICarrot View Post
    CTD I laughed when I first read that on pprnue but its even more fitting here!


    Crabtastic the sorry state of the FAA in 39-40 was due to the RAF - it was well within budget and native RN demands to upgrade the FAA to a top level during the 1930s (such was the cheapness of aircraft design and construction at the time).



    Force Z would not have sailed had Churchill listened to advice. This is a man who was convinced the Japanese would not attack and was equally convinced that they would give up at a show of force. Force Z was a gamble that backfired NOT a representation of military doctrine or the understanding of airpower at the time.

    Finally force Z had shoddy landbased aircover because the RAF had not sent sufficient assets to the theatre AND had not liased with the army for the placement of airfields which they plonked all over the place in indefensible positions which led to them being of better use to the Japanese than the RAF.
    Sorry about that but, unlike the army, the RAF was rather preoccupied in Europe at the time and the arse-end of the Empire took a back seat for a bit. Remember, we weren't at war with Japan when the force was dispatched: they were supposed to be the deterrent.

    And I hardly think running an aircraft carrier aground can be blamed on the RAF and neither can the force commander's decision to a) not let his position be known to the RAAF until an hour after he'd been first attacked and b) reject both 453 Sqn's plan to keep a 6-ship CAP overhead during daylight and further assistance from 488 Sqn RNZAF c) underestimate the capability of air power to inflict damage on his force.
    Last edited by crabtastic; 10-08-2010 at 16:04.
    http://cdn.wwtdd.com/wp-content/uplo...n-popcicle.gif
    "If you ask me, this country could use a little less motivation. The people who are motivated are the ones causing all the trouble. Stock swindlers, serial killers, child molesters, Christian conservatives... these people are highly motivated." -George Carlin

    "If some cunt can fuck something up, that cunt will pick the worst possible time to fucking fuck it up cause that cunt's a cunt." -Malcolm Tucker

Page 11 of 22 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •